A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Alveolar Ridge Preservation using a synthetic alloplastic bone substitute and a resorbable polymer membrane and Minimally invasive flapless tooth extraction followed by unassisted spontaneous healing in Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Substitutes and Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, sponsored by Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.
Sponsored by Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Health services research
The dimensional collapse of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction represents a critical challenge for implant rehabilitation. This research proposes an alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) protocol based on the combination of a slow-resorbing alloplastic synthetic biomaterial and a polymer-based resorbable synthetic membrane. Through a digital workflow integrating cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning (Carestream 3800), volumetric changes in hard and soft tissues will be monitored. The study will compare baseline conditions with outcomes at 4 months of healing, analyzing whether the use of the membrane ensures adequate support for the gingival phenotype and minimizes buccal bone plate resorption.
158 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Resorption; 26 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 28 is above the median of 24 across 137 interventional studies indexed under Bone Resorption.
Browse Bone Resorption studies →Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia is the lead sponsor of 138 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Following atraumatic tooth extraction and rigorous socket debridement, the alveolar defect will be grafted with a slow-resorbing synthetic alloplastic bone substitute. A resorbable polymer-based synthetic barrier membrane will be adapted over the graft material. The surgical site will be managed via a \[flapped / flapless\] approach and stabilizing sutures will be placed to allow for \[primary / secondary\] intention healing. No loading or prosthetic provisionalization will be applied over the grafted socket during the 4-month healing period.
Procedure: Alveolar Ridge Preservation using a synthetic alloplastic bone substitute and a resorbable polymer membrane
Following atraumatic tooth extraction and rigorous socket debridement, the alveolar defect will be left to heal spontaneously without the application of any bone graft material or barrier membrane. A natural blood clot will be allowed to form and stabilize within the socket. The surgical site will be managed strictly via a flapless approach, with stabilizing sutures placed only if necessary to secure the coagulum and achieve hemostasis. The socket will undergo unassisted secondary intention healing during the 4-month observation period prior to implant placement evaluation.
Procedure: Minimally invasive flapless tooth extraction followed by unassisted spontaneous healing
This experimental intervention is distinguished by a fully synthetic, animal-free grafting protocol. Following a strictly flapless tooth extraction to preserve periosteal blood supply to the buccal bundle bone, the socket is grafted with a slow-resorbing synthetic alloplastic bone substitute, designed to act as a long-term space maintainer rather than a rapidly turning-over material. Crucially, the graft is covered by a polymer-based resorbable synthetic membrane, distinguishing it from standard protocols utilizing native or cross-linked collagen. The membrane is stabilized using non-resorbable cross-mattress sutures. To prevent distortion of the mucogingival junction, no periosteal releasing incisions are performed, and the site is left to heal by secondary intention with the membrane intentionally left exposed to the oral environment
This control intervention is strictly distinguished by the complete absence of any ridge preservation biomaterials. It represents the baseline dimensional collapse of the alveolar ridge. Following a minimally invasive, flapless tooth extraction identical to the experimental arm, the socket is vigorously debrided but left unassisted to heal via a natural blood clot. To distinguish this true negative control from active comparators, no hemostatic agents (e.g., oxidized regenerated cellulose or gelatin sponges) are placed within the alveolus. Sutures are applied strictly to stabilize the existing gingival margins and secure the coagulum, allowing physiological secondary intention healing without any artificial space maintenance
Absolute Volumetric Change of the Alveolar Ridge Contour
The primary outcome is the total volumetric alteration of the alveolar ridge, encompassing combined hard and soft tissue dimensional changes. This will be quantified in cubic millimeters (mm\^3) through a digital superimposition protocol. Baseline (Day 0) intraoral surface scans (STL) and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) DICOM files will be spatially aligned with 4-month (T1) postoperative STL and CBCT datasets using specialized image analysis software. A standardized Region of Interest (ROI) will be established using stable anatomical landmarks (e.g., adjacent teeth, hard palate) to calculate the absolute volume loss or gain
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0, immediately post-extraction) and at 4 months post-operative.
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia →