ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT07878793hEDS-OutUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome Healthcare Usage and Outcomes in England

An observational study in Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, sponsored by Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust. Withdrawn. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Data application was made to NHS England but difficulties encountered in obtaining relevant data, and how this data could be accessed and processed. CI/PI has now since retired from the trust before data could be obtained.
Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
0
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To understand the access to services and outcomes for patients with hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

Read the detailed description

Ehlers Danlos (EDS) describes a range of connective tissue disorders characterised by joint hypermobility and hyperextensible skin. Thirteen of the fourteen sub-types have been attributed to molecular causes associated with alterations in 20 genes, most of which encode fibrillar collagen proteins (types I, III and V). Hypermobile EDS or hEDS is the most common EDS sub-type and the only sub-type to have a currently unknown genetic basis. Diagnosis is made with a clinical graded criteria scale, the presence of complications and family history.

Complications of hEDS affect multiple body systems. Neurological complications include cerebrospinal fluid leak when associated with Chiari malformation Type I, and spinal hypermobility (associated with ligament laxity) which has been described as atlanto-axial instability (AAI) or cranio-cervical instability (CCI). hEDS patients undergo cervical stabilisation surgery for spinal hypermobility in other countries, the role of this procedure has been questioned. The clinical and radiological biomarkers of spinal instability are suggested in the literature but are highly controversial and generally not accepted by the UK neurosurgical community. Fixation for cervical spine injuries, rheumatoid arthritis, gross infection, and discogenic disease, where patients also have EDS, is not in contention. What is debated is the role of fixation for hEDS patients for excess mobility of their cervical spine alone, without other pathological features.

Many patients are in fact going abroad for surgical spinal stabilisation and a recent survey of these patients suggested significant benefit from fixation, albeit with a high complication and multiple surgery rate. The recognised treatment for spinal instability would ideally include an integrated pathway of rehabilitation and pain management, (perhaps under the care of rheumatology services) before considering any form of surgery. Currently, there appears to be no coordinated system of care for these patients in the UK nor for UK hEDS patients travelling abroad for surgery. Local rheumatologists state there are nationally commissioned services, whilst the national providers state that they are a diagnostic service for all types of EDS other than the hypermobile type and subsequent treatment should be provided locally. Some pain management services do treat EDS patients, but availability varies by region.

Ultimately, there is very little published data available to demonstrate the services available, the size of this group of patients or their service usage and need. The adequacy of the data available in national databases is also not yet clear.

Given the significant obscurity regarding the clinical prevalence and needs of this patient subgroup as well as the recognised phenomenon of patients travelling abroad for their treatments, it is necessary to investigate these patients and understand their condition further in the UK. This includes detailing the use of resources to better understand the available facilities for this patient group and to help understand the reasons for travel.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ehlers Danlos Syndrome
  • EDS
  • Hypermobility
03

In context

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

67 studies on the registry are indexed under Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; 24 are open to participants now.

Browse Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who have a diagnosis of hEDS recorded in the GPDPR and HES, accessing services over the four year period of 2018-2021

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have a diagnosis of hEDS recorded in the GPDPR and HES, accessing services over the four year period of 2018-2021

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No EDS diagnosis
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determination of size and demographic of hypermobile population in England

    Development of overall patient totals, along with the completion of trend analysis results in regards to demographics, regarding all UK patients coded with hEDS (Approximately 5,500 patients). Raw data being reviewed in order to generate the overall totals and trend analysis include; GP attendance, secondary care attendance, hospital stay, procedures, complication rates, COVID-19 infection rates, and association of above factors with COVID-19 Infection.

    Time frame: All clinical data for patients coded with hEDS over a three year period (2019-2021)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determination of healthcare services accessed by hypermobile patient population

    Overall results regarding healthcare services accessed by all UK patients coded with hEDS (Approximately 5,500 patients). The raw data collected and processed to determine this result will be clinical outcomes including; GP attendance, secondary care attendance, hospital stay, procedures, complication rates, COVID-19 infection rates, and association of above factors with COVID-19 Infection.

    Time frame: All clinical data for patients coded with hEDS over a three year period (2019-2021)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2024 to primary completion in May 2026, 26 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 2, 2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
StartActual
Mar 14, 2024
Primary completionActual
May 18, 2026
CompletionActual
May 18, 2026
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07878793
Lead sponsor
Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Mar 14, 2024
Primary completion
May 18, 2026
Completion
May 18, 2026
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Andrew Brodbelt
principal investigator · Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion