ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07899554DIAGNOSEDhUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Evaluation of the Role of Serum Tenascin-X Levels in the Diagnosis of Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

An interventional study of Blood sampling in Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS), sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Thirteen types of EDS have been described based on their clinical manifestations and genetic backgrounds. Their diagnosis relies on personal and family medical history, together with established clinical criteria. A definitive diagnosis can then be confirmed through genetic testing. However, definitive diagnosis of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), the most common EDS subtype (>80% of cases), remains impossible because its molecular basis is still unknown.

The diagnosis of hEDS is based on a set of clinical criteria, some of which are subject to examiner interpretation. These criteria have limitations at the extremes of age and in mild or incomplete forms, potentially preventing a formal diagnosis. Patients may consequently experience a diagnostic odyssey and psychological distress, without recognition of their condition or access to appropriate management.

The diagnosis of hEDS is further complicated by the overlap between its clinical manifestations and those of Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders (HSD), which are relatively common in the general population (1-3%). HSD are also characterized by joint hypermobility, which may be complicated by joint instability and pain, but unlike hEDS, they are not associated with tissue fragility. There is therefore an urgent need to identify a reliable, simple, reproducible, and widely accessible diagnostic criterion to establish a diagnosis of hEDS in the large population of hypermobile patients.

Tenascin-X (TN-X) is a glycoprotein involved in the assembly of the ECM. One study showed that TN-X levels were reduced by 35% in 52% of hypermobile patients (9/17) compared with healthy controls. This finding suggests a possible association between serum TN-X levels and hEDS. However, no correlation has yet been investigated.

We hypothesize that serum TN-X levels could serve as a biological diagnostic criterion for hEDS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS)

Keywords

  • Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS)
  • Genetic disorders
03

In context

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Browse Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

hEDS group:

hEDS diagnostic criteria according to the 2017 classification Female sex Age between 18 and 60 years

Control group = healthy volunteers:

Female sex Age between 18 and 60 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria hEDS group:

Pregnant or breastfeeding women Persons deprived of their liberty or under legal guardianship Persons unable to comply with the medical follow-up required for the study for geographical, social, or psychological reasons Persons not affiliated with the French social security system Inability to provide the participant with adequate information and/or inability of the participant to provide written : dementia, psychosis, impaired consciousness, non-French-speaking patients

Control group = healthy volunteers:

Suspected or diagnosed hEDS Joint hypermobility with a Beighton score ≥ 5 History of recurrent sprains and/or dislocations History of scoliosis requiring bracing or surgery Clinical cutaneous features suggestive of EDS or another connective tissue disorder Connective tissue-related skin disorders (hypertrophic or keloid scars, etc.) Fragility of other connective tissues in the body Diseases or conditions causing extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling (tumors, inflammatory or allergic diseases, postoperative healing within the previous year) Pregnant or breastfeeding women Persons deprived of their liberty or under legal guardianship Persons unable to comply with the medical follow-up required for the study for geographical, social, or psychological reasons Persons not affiliated with the French social security system Inability to provide the participant with adequate information and/or inability of the participant to provide written informed consent: dementia, psychosis, impaired consciousness, non-French-speaking patients.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

    Collection of blood samples (serum and whole blood) during a follow-up visit as part of the participant's usual care for TN-X concentration measurement

    Genetic: Blood sampling

  • Other
    Control group (healthy volunteers)

    Collection of blood samples (serum and whole blood) for TN-X concentration measurement

    Genetic: Blood sampling

Interventions

  • GeneticBlood sampling

    Collection of blood samples (serum and whole blood) for TN-X concentration measurement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of TN-X concentration

    Measurement of TN-X concentration (ng/mL) in serum from the experimental population (= patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome \[hEDS\]) and the control population (= healthy volunteers), using a targeted quantitative proteomics approach based on mass spectrometry We will assess the ability of the serum TN-X level to discriminate between patients with and without hEDS, classified according to the gold standard, using the area under the ROC curve, estimated as a point estimate and with a 95% confidence interval. The diagnosis of hEDS, considered the gold standard, will be established according to the clinical criteria validated by the International Consortium on Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes \[4,5\], by a physician with expertise in this rare disease at the participating centers.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic threshold for serum TN-X levels for the diagnosis of hEDS

    Diagnostic threshold for serum TN-X levels for the diagnosis of hEDS, determined using the Youden index on the same ROC curve.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07899554
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Karelle Benistan, MD
Contact
karelle.benistan@aphp.fr
+33 (0)147104440
Karelle Benistan, MD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion