ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07874789Updated Oct 15, 2026

Effect of Curcumin Topical Spray on Wound Healing After Tooth Extraction

An interventional study of Curcumin Topical Spray and Chlorhexidine Topical Spray in Wound Healing, Alveolitis of Jaw and Tooth Extraction, sponsored by Istanbul University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by Istanbul University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 15, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effects of a topical curcumin spray on post-extraction wound healing and postoperative symptoms in adults undergoing first molar extraction. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: curcumin topical spray, 0.12% chlorhexidine topical spray, or standard postoperative care without a topical spray. The interventions will be applied twice daily for 7 days. Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale, while wound healing will be evaluated using the Landry, Turnbull, and Howley Healing Index. Wound dimensions will also be recorded during follow-up. In addition, salivary levels of inflammatory biomarkers, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), will be analyzed to assess the local inflammatory response during the postoperative healing period.The study aims to compare the clinical effects of topical curcumin with chlorhexidine and standard postoperative care during the early healing period after tooth extraction.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a randomized, single-blind, three-arm controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a curcumin-containing topical spray on early wound healing and postoperative symptoms following first molar extraction in adults aged 18-40 years.

Eligible participants requiring first molar extraction will undergo minimally traumatic tooth extraction without primary suturing. Following extraction, participants will be randomly allocated to one of three study groups. Participants in the curcumin group will use a Curcuma longa-containing topical spray, administered as two sprays to the extraction site twice daily for 7 days. Participants in the chlorhexidine group will use a 0.12% chlorhexidine topical spray according to the same administration schedule. Participants in the control group will receive standard postoperative care without the use of an additional topical spray.

All participants will receive standardized postoperative instructions. Clinical follow-up will be performed during the early postoperative healing period. Postoperative pain will be assessed using a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Soft-tissue wound healing will be evaluated using the Landry, Turnbull, and Howley Healing Index on postoperative days 7 and 14. Wound dimensions will be measured in the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions during follow-up.

In addition to clinical assessments, salivary inflammatory biomarkers, including interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), will be analyzed to evaluate the local inflammatory response associated with postoperative healing.

The study will compare clinical healing, postoperative pain, wound dimensions, mouth opening, and inflammatory biomarker levels among the curcumin, chlorhexidine, and control groups. The aim is to determine whether topical curcumin influences early post-extraction wound healing and postoperative inflammatory symptoms compared with chlorhexidine and standard postoperative care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wound Healing
  • Alveolitis of Jaw
  • Tooth Extraction
  • Curcumin

Keywords

  • curcumin
  • Curcuma longa
  • Tooth extraction
  • Wound healing
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Chlorhexidine
  • Oral Wound Healing
  • Inflammation
  • Salivary Biomarkers
  • PGE2
  • IL-1β
  • TNF-α
03

In context

Dry Socket

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Socket; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 60 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Dry Socket.

Browse Dry Socket studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University is the lead sponsor of 507 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy individuals aged 18-40 years with ASA physical status I.
  • Patients scheduled for extraction of a mandibular first molar.
  • Individuals who voluntarily agree to participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Individuals without chronic systemic disease and who do not use regular medication.
  • Patients with no oral health condition that would contraindicate the surgical procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals.
  • Patients with systemic diseases or immunosuppression.
  • Individuals with a history of previous surgery or trauma in the same region.
  • Individuals with a known allergy or hypersensitivity to turmeric (curcumin), chlorhexidine spray, or any component of the study products.
  • Individuals who smoke or consume alcohol.
  • Individuals who regularly use medications, particularly anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant drugs.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Curcumin Topical Spray

    Participants will receive a Curcuma longa-containing topical spray applied to the extraction site as two sprays twice daily for 7 days, in addition to standard postoperative care.

    Dietary Supplement: Curcumin Topical Spray

  • Active comparator
    Chlorhexidine Topical Spray

    Participants will receive a 0.12% chlorhexidine topical spray applied to the extraction site as two sprays twice daily for 7 days, in addition to standard postoperative care.

    Drug: Chlorhexidine Topical Spray

  • No intervention
    Standard Postoperative Care

    Participants will receive standard postoperative care following tooth extraction without the use of an additional topical spray.

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementCurcumin Topical Spray

    A commercially available Curcuma longa-containing topical spray (Minerelax®) will be applied directly to the extraction site as two sprays twice daily for 7 days following tooth extraction, in addition to standardized postoperative care.

  • DrugChlorhexidine Topical Spray

    0.12% chlorhexidine topical spray administered to the extraction site as two sprays twice daily for 7 days.

    Also known as: Chlorhexidine 0.12% Topical Spray

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Extraction Socket Healing Assessed Using the Landry, Turnbull and Howley Healing Index

    Extraction socket healing will be assessed using the Landry, Turnbull and Howley Healing Index, ranging from 1 (very poor healing) to 5 (excellent healing). Higher scores indicate better wound healing. Scores will be compared among the curcumin spray, chlorhexidine spray, and standard postoperative care groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 7. and 14. days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity at the extraction site will be assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Assessments will be performed by telephone on days 1, 3, and 5 and at the clinical visit on day 7. Scores will be compared among the three study groups.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.

  2. Change in Extraction Socket Wound Size

    Wound size will be assessed by directly measuring the distance between predefined anatomical landmarks at the extraction site. Measurements on postoperative days 7 and 14 will be compared with the initial measurement obtained on day 0 and among the three study groups. A reduction in the measured distance indicates wound closure.

    Time frame: Day 0 following extraction and postoperative days 7 and 14.

  3. Change in Salivary Interleukin-1 Beta Concentration

    Salivary interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) concentrations will be measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Concentrations on postoperative days 2 and 7 and changes from the pre-extraction baseline will be compared among the three study groups to assess the local inflammatory response.

    Time frame: Before extraction (day 0) and postoperative days 2 and 7.

  4. Change in Salivary Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Concentration

    Salivary tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) concentrations will be measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Concentrations on postoperative days 2 and 7 and changes from the pre-extraction baseline will be compared among the three study groups to assess the local inflammatory response.

    Time frame: Before extraction (day 0) and postoperative days 2 and 7.

  5. Change in Salivary Prostaglandin E2 Concentration

    Salivary prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations will be measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Concentrations on postoperative days 2 and 7 and changes from the pre-extraction baseline will be compared among the three study groups to assess the local inflammatory response.

    Time frame: Before extraction (day 0) and postoperative days 2 and 7.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34452, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dei Cas M, Ghidoni R. Dietary Curcumin: Correlation between Bioavailability and Health Potential. Nutrients. 2019 Sep 8;11(9):2147. doi: 10.3390/nu11092147. PubMed 31500361 ↗
  • Amaliya A, Ramadhanti R, Hadikrishna I, Maulina T. The Effectiveness of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gel on Early Wound Healing after Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):688-694. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739544. Epub 2022 Jan 11. PubMed 35016228 ↗
  • Broers DLM, Dubois L, de Lange J, Su N, de Jongh A. Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review. Int Dent J. 2022 Feb;72(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Feb 26. PubMed 33648772 ↗
  • Sahebkar A, Henrotin Y. Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Curcuminoids in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):1192-202. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv024. Epub 2015 Dec 14. PubMed 26814259 ↗
  • Seyedzadeh MH, Safari Z, Zare A, Gholizadeh Navashenaq J, Razavi SA, Kardar GA, Khorramizadeh MR. Study of curcumin immunomodulatory effects on reactive astrocyte cell function. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014 Sep;22(1):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.06.035. Epub 2014 Jul 3. PubMed 24998635 ↗
  • Anthwal A, Thakur BK, Rawat MS, Rawat DS, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro anticancer activity of C-5 curcumin analogues with potential to inhibit TNF-alpha-induced NF-kappaB activation. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:524161. doi: 10.1155/2014/524161. Epub 2014 Jul 24. PubMed 25157362 ↗
  • Esatbeyoglu T, Huebbe P, Ernst IM, Chin D, Wagner AE, Rimbach G. Curcumin--from molecule to biological function. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 May 29;51(22):5308-32. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107724. Epub 2012 May 4. PubMed 22566109 ↗
  • McCoy LC, Wehler CJ, Rich SE, Garcia RI, Miller DR, Jones JA. Adverse events associated with chlorhexidine use: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs Dental Diabetes Study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Feb;139(2):178-83. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0134. PubMed 18245686 ↗
  • Yin Y, Shuai F, Liu X, Zhao Y, Han X, Zhao H. Biomaterials and therapeutic strategies designed for tooth extraction socket healing. Biomaterials. 2025 May;316:122975. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122975. Epub 2024 Nov 29. PubMed 39626339 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because a formal data-sharing plan and infrastructure have not been established for this study.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Nov 2026, 2 months later.

Of 17 interventional studies with no phase under Dry Socket, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2026
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 29, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 25, 2027
Last update
Oct 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07874789
Responsible party
Ece Duru (Dt., Istanbul University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
Start date
Sep 29, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 25, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Ece Duru
Contact
duru.ece@ogr.iu.edu.tr
+905314066610
Metin Berk Kasapoglu, associate professor
principal investigator · Istanbul University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion