ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07794852Updated Oct 1, 2026

Dural Sac Area-Guided Spinal Anesthesia Dosing for TURP

An interventional study of DSCSA-Guided Individualized Spinal Anesthesia Dosing and Bupivacaine in Intraoperative Hypotension, Spinal Aneshtesia and TURP(Transurethral Resection of Prostate), sponsored by Istanbul University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Istanbul University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 1, 2026Now Enrolling by invitationStart date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled study will evaluate whether individualizing the dose of spinal anesthesia according to the ultrasound-derived dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) can improve hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Participants aged 40 years or older will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the individualized-dose group, the anteroposterior diameter of the dural sac will be measured by ultrasound at the L3-L4 level, and DSCSA will be calculated from this measurement. The dose of intrathecal bupivacaine will then be individualized according to the calculated DSCSA. In the control group, participants will receive a fixed dose of intrathecal bupivacaine. Both groups will also receive intrathecal fentanyl.

The main outcome is the incidence of intraoperative hypotension. The study will also evaluate the number of hypotensive episodes, minimum mean arterial pressure, vasopressor and atropine requirements, sensory and motor block characteristics, respiratory monitoring parameters, cerebral oxygenation, and adverse events.

The study aims to determine whether a DSCSA-guided dosing strategy can reduce excessive spinal block and improve hemodynamic stability while maintaining effective spinal anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized controlled study compares two routinely used approaches to determining the intrathecal bupivacaine dose for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). No new drug, new indication, or experimental treatment will be introduced. Both dosing approaches are currently used in routine clinical practice; the study will prospectively and randomly compare their clinical effects.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either a dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA)-guided individualized dosing group or a fixed-dose control group.

Before spinal anesthesia, the anteroposterior diameter of the dural sac will be measured by ultrasound at the L3-L4 intervertebral level. DSCSA will be calculated using the formula A = π × (D/2)².

In the individualized-dose group, a DSCSA of 150 mm² will be used as the reference value corresponding to 10 mg of intrathecal bupivacaine. The bupivacaine dose will be adjusted proportionally according to the participant's calculated DSCSA and limited to a minimum of 6 mg and a maximum of 12.5 mg. Fentanyl 25 micrograms will be added intrathecally.

In the fixed-dose group, participants will receive 10 mg (2 mL of 0.5%) intrathecal bupivacaine together with fentanyl 25 micrograms.

Spinal anesthesia will be performed at the L3-L4 intervertebral space using a 27-gauge Quincke needle. Standard intraoperative monitoring will be performed according to the study protocol. Sensory and motor block characteristics and hemodynamic variables will be recorded prospectively for comparison between the two dosing strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intraoperative Hypotension
  • Spinal Aneshtesia
  • TURP(Transurethral Resection of Prostate)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dural sac cross-sectional area
  • Spinal anesthesia
  • Individualized spinal anesthesia
  • Ultrasound
  • Intraoperative hypotension
  • Hemodynamic stability
  • Transurethral resection of the prostate
03

In context

Hypotension

885 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypotension; 195 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 87 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Hypotension.

Browse Hypotension studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University is the lead sponsor of 511 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male participants aged 40 years or older
  • (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Scheduled to undergo transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for prostate cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of spinal anesthesia
  • Local infection or wound at the planned puncture site
  • Current anticoagulant therapy
  • Neurological disease, including multiple sclerosis, myelopathy, or peripheral neuropathy
  • Known allergy to any of the study medications
  • Inability to maintain the required position during ultrasound measurement or spinal puncture
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DSCSA-Guided Individualized Dose

    The dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) will be estimated from the ultrasound-measured anteroposterior dural sac diameter at the L3-L4 level. The intrathecal bupivacaine dose will be individualized according to the DSCSA, using 150 mm² as the reference area corresponding to 10 mg bupivacaine. The calculated bupivacaine dose will be limited to 6-12.5 mg. Fentanyl 25 micrograms will also be administered intrathecally.

    Procedure: DSCSA-Guided Individualized Spinal Anesthesia Dosing · Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Fentanyl (FEN)

  • Active comparator
    Fixed Dose

    Participants will receive a fixed intrathecal dose of 10 mg (2 mL of 0.5%) bupivacaine together with fentanyl 25 micrograms.

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Fentanyl (FEN)

Interventions

  • ProcedureDSCSA-Guided Individualized Spinal Anesthesia Dosing

    The dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) is calculated from the ultrasound-measured anteroposterior dural sac diameter at the L3-L4 level. The intrathecal bupivacaine dose is individualized according to DSCSA.

  • Hyperbaric bupivacaine is administered intrathecally in both study groups. In the DSCSA-guided group, the dose is individualized according to DSCSA, using 150 mm² as the reference corresponding to 10 mg, with a permitted dose range of 6 to 12.5 mg. In the fixed-dose group, 10 mg (2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine) is administered.

  • Fentanyl 25 micrograms is administered intrathecally together with bupivacaine in both study groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Intraoperative Hypotension

    Intraoperative hypotension is defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥20% from baseline or an MAP \<65 mmHg. Participants meeting either criterion at least once during surgery will be classified as having intraoperative hypotension. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants with intraoperative hypotension.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Intraoperative Hypotension Episodes

    Number of intraoperative hypotension episodes recorded for each participant. Hypotension is defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥20% from baseline or an MAP \<65 mmHg.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  2. Minimum Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure

    Lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured in mmHg, recorded during the intraoperative period.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  3. Percentage of Participants With a ≥30% Decrease in Mean Arterial Pressure

    Percentage of participants experiencing at least one decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥30% from baseline during surgery.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  4. Percentage of Participants Requiring Ephedrine

    Percentage of participants receiving at least one intravenous dose of ephedrine for treatment of intraoperative hypotension.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  5. Total Ephedrine Dose

    Total intravenous ephedrine dose, measured in milligrams (mg), administered to each participant during surgery.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  6. Percentage of Participants Requiring Atropine

    Percentage of participants receiving intravenous atropine for treatment of intraoperative bradycardia.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  7. Total Atropine Dose

    Total intravenous atropine dose, measured in milligrams (mg), administered to each participant during surgery.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  8. Maximum Sensory Block Level

    Highest cephalad sensory block level achieved after spinal anesthesia, assessed by the pin-prick test and recorded as the corresponding dermatomal level.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  9. Time to Achieve T10 Sensory Block

    Time, measured in minutes, from completion of intrathecal injection to achievement of a T10 sensory block, assessed using the pin-prick test.

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  10. Time to Two-Dermatome Sensory Regression

    Time, measured in minutes, from the maximum sensory block level to regression of the sensory block by two dermatomes, assessed using the pin-prick test.

    Time frame: From maximum sensory block until two-dermatome regression, assessed up to 3 hours after spinal anesthesia

  11. Time to Recovery to Modified Bromage Score 0

    Time, measured in minutes, from completion of intrathecal injection until recovery to a Modified Bromage score of 0, indicating complete recovery of lower-extremity motor function.

    Time frame: From completion of spinal anesthesia until recovery to Modified Bromage score 0, assessed up to 3 hours after spinal anesthesia

  12. Number of Integrated Pulmonary Index ≤4 Episodes

    Number of episodes in which the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) is ≤4. The IPI is a composite score ranging from 1 to 10 based on end-tidal carbon dioxide, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and pulse rate; lower scores indicate greater respiratory compromise.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

  13. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Percentage of participants experiencing at least one adverse event recorded during the intraoperative study period.

    Time frame: During surgery (from completion of spinal anesthesia until the end of surgery)

Other outcomes

  1. Mean Left Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During the First 60 Minutes

    Mean left regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂), measured continuously by frontal near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during the first 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia. The outcome will be reported as the mean rSO₂ value.

    Time frame: During the first 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  2. Minimum Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation

    Lowest regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂) value recorded by frontal near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during the first 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia.

    Time frame: During the first 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  3. Maximum Relative Decrease in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation

    Maximum relative decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (ΔrSO₂max) from the baseline value during the first 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia, measured by frontal near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

    Time frame: During the first 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 2 months after the start.

Of 210 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypotension, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 22. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 217 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 22.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 23, 2026
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
StartActual
Aug 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 24, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 10, 2026
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
changed Oct 1, 2026
Start date
Aug 24, 2026→Aug 27, 2026 (actual)
Oct 1, 2026
Contact
No study contact listed any more: removed b•••@gmail.com · •••3177
Oct 1, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine · Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)Contact removed m•••@iuc.edu.tr · •••3044
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
    Start date Aug 24, 2026→Aug 27, 2026 (now actual)
    Contact No study contact listed any more: removed b•••@gmail.com · •••3177
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine · Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)Contact removed m•••@iuc.edu.tr · •••3044

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07794852
Responsible party
Ezgi Budak Ozyalcın (Specialist in Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
Start date
Aug 27, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 24, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Ezgi Budak Özyalçın, MD
principal investigator · Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion