ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07869121Updated Oct 9, 2026

Achilles Non-SNIS REGENETEN

An observational study in Complete Mid-portion Achilles Rupture, sponsored by OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. · Observational

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
21 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed study addresses this gap by prospectively evaluating patient-reported outcomes, imaging endpoints, and safety through 12 months after BCI-augmented repair in IAT and MSR patients. The purpose is to evaluate clinical outcomes (effectiveness) following the use of REGENETEN to augment Achilles tendon surgical procedures.

Read the detailed description

Achilles tendon pathology is a common musculoskeletal condition, affecting approximately 6% of the general population. Mid substance ruptures (MSR) have a reported incidence rate of approximately 2.1 per 100000 people, and one third of all instances of Achilles tendon pain have been attributed to Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT).

Although patients undergoing standard of care repair of MSR generally report good clinical outcomes, and re-rupture rates following primary repair of a mid-substance tear are cited to range 2-3%, the timeframe for returning to activity can be upwards of 6-8 months, despite an intensive rehabilitation process. For patients suffering from IAT, conservative management is usually employed as the first line intervention in this pathology, however approximately 30% of patients fail conservative management and require further intervention. Although there is insufficient literature to provide a consensus on the surgical approach which gives the best outcomes, healing of the tendon back to its insertion following surgery is typically slow.

Bioinductive collagen scaffolds (BCIs) have been adopted to augment tendon healing in the shoulder and are increasingly described in the Achilles as a means to enhance standard of care procedures. Early evidence, through case reports/technical notes and small case series across MSR and IAT , describe improvements in patient-reported outcomes and imaging evidence of scaffold integration by 6 months. Robust prospective data in US populations, however, remains sparse.

The proposed study addresses this gap by prospectively evaluating patient-reported outcomes, imaging endpoints, and safety through 12 months after BCI-augmented repair in IAT and MSR patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complete Mid-portion Achilles Rupture

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • achilles rupture
  • achilles
  • rupture
  • Regeneten
  • Achilles Tendinopathy
03

In context

Rupture

556 studies on the registry are indexed under Rupture; 96 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 204 observational studies indexed under Rupture.

Browse Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who present as eligible for Krakow sutured, bundle-to-bundle repair for mid-substance primary Achilles rupture with REGENETEN augmentation. Fixation of REGENETEN implant to be completed with tendon anchors.

Patients who present as eligible for Achilles tendon reconstruction, with or without concomitant calcaneoplasty/bursectomy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Fixation of REGENETEN implant to be completed with tendon anchors.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Acute Mid-Substance Rupture:

  • Clinical diagnosis of complete mid-portion Achilles rupture by experienced physician (Diagnosis confirmation to include presence of positive Thompson test)
  • Adult patients ≥21 to 70 years old
  • Acute rupture (≤14 days of initial injury)
  • Rupture located 2-6cm proximal to calcaneal insertion mid portion
  • Indicated for surgical procedure

Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy:

  • Diagnosis of insertional Achilles tendinopathy confirmed by imaging and having failed at least 3 months of conservative management.
  • Adult patients ≥21 to 70 years old
  • Indicated for surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Achilles tendon retraction >3cm (Kuwada grade II)
  • Avulsion injury
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant
  • Previously known reaction to bovine
  • Concurrent lower extremity fracture/ acute polytrauma
  • Local injections (corticosteroid or biologic) within 6-months of rupture on the injured achilles
  • Fluoroquinolone use within last 6 months
  • Diabetes (uncontrolled)
  • HTN (uncontrolled)
  • Current smoking
  • Skin problems over Achilles
  • Current infection
  • Open Achilles rupture
  • Neurovascular disease
  • Neurological disorder (eg stroke)
  • Immunosuppressive treatment
  • Known/ ongoing litigation from the injury in question ( eg workers comp with litigation)
  • Subjects with insufficient tendon tissue quality for management and protection of the tendon injury using the isolated REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant system
  • Collagen or connective tissue disorder
  • BMI 40+
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Krakow sutured, bundle-to-bundle repair

    Krakow sutured, bundle-to-bundle repair for mid-substance primary Achilles rupture with REGENETEN augmentation. Fixation of REGENETEN implant to be completed with tendon anchors.

    Device: REGENETEN

  • Achilles tendon reconstruction

    Achilles tendon reconstruction, with or without concomitant calcaneoplasty/bursectomy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Fixation of REGENETEN implant to be completed with tendon anchors.

    Device: REGENETEN

Interventions

  • DeviceREGENETEN

    The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is a scaffold made from highly purified type I collagen fibers. Following fixation, using its efficient and suture-free technique, the REGENETEN Implant is resorbed and replaced by a new layer of tendon-like tissue within 6 months increasing tendon thickness, and creating an environment conducive to healing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hindfoot score

    AOFAS ankle/hindfoot score - Clinician reported score completed at 12 months post Achilles surgical procedure. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points

    Time frame: 12 months post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tendon healing at site of procedure

    Tendon healing at site of procedure, answered as a "yes" or "no" to whether the tendon is completely healed as viewed on imaging and clinical assessment

    Time frame: 12 months post surgery

  2. Implant absorption

    Implant absorption seen on imaging, identified as "None ; Partial ; or Complete absorption seen"

    Time frame: 12 months post surgery

  3. Tendon thickness

    Tendon thickness seen on imaging

    Time frame: 12 months post surgery

  4. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

    Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) (Mid-substance rupture patients only). Each item is graded from 0 (major limitations or severe symptoms) to 10 (no limitations or normal function)

    Time frame: preop/screening, 6 week postoperative , 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months postoperative

  5. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment Achilles (VISA-A)

    VISA-A (IAT patients only) score completed at preop/screening, 6 week , 3, 6 and 12-month post op review. This is a specific outcome measure to Achilles tendinopathy patient, scored from 0 to 100 points with higher points indicating healthier patients.

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperative , 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months postoperative

  6. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain scale of 0-10 with higher scores indicating more pain.

    Time frame: preoperative/screening, 6 weeks postoperative , 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months postoperative

  7. Heel-rise test

    Heel-rise test: Completed in office at preop/Screening, 3-, 6-, 12-months, under PT supervision if possible.

    Time frame: preoperative/Screening, 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months postoperative

Other outcomes

  1. Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA)

    Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA): measured by physician. Completed in office at preop/screening, 3-, 6-, 12- months

    Time frame: preoperative/screening, 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months postoperative

  2. Range of Motion (ROM)

    Range of motion: Completed in office at preop/screening, 3-, 6-, 12 months; patient is supine with knee straight

    Time frame: preoperative/screening, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperative

  3. Charlotte Hindfoot Assessment

    Charlotte Hindfoot Assessment: Scored between 0 and 100 points, where a higher score indicates better function and less pain.

    Time frame: preoperative/screening, 6 weeks postoperative, 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months postoperative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • OrthoCarolina Research Institute
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Genuth G, Iselin LD. Treating insertional Achilles tendinitis with bio inductive collagen scaffold - Does it improve outcomes? A case series. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Feb 7;63:102931. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102931. eCollection 2025 Apr. PubMed 40041090 ↗
  • Moonot P, Dakhode S. Current concept review of Achilles tendinopathy. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Feb 23;50:102374. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102374. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38463138 ↗
  • Shoap S, Backer HC, Freibott CE, Ferrer XE, Polzer H, Turner Vosseller J. Rerupture and wound complications following Achilles tendon repair: A systematic review. J Orthop Res. 2023 Apr;41(4):845-851. doi: 10.1002/jor.25419. Epub 2022 Aug 6. PubMed 35864743 ↗
  • Lo IK, Kirkley A, Nonweiler B, Kumbhare DA. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative review. Clin J Sport Med. 1997 Jul;7(3):207-11. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199707000-00010. PubMed 9262889 ↗
  • Sharma P, Maffulli N. Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):187-202. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.01850. PubMed 15634833 ↗
  • Lemme NJ, Li NY, DeFroda SF, Kleiner J, Owens BD. Epidemiology of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in the United States: Athletic and Nonathletic Injuries From 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov 26;6(11):2325967118808238. doi: 10.1177/2325967118808238. eCollection 2018 Nov. PubMed 30505872 ↗
  • Traweger A, Scott A, Kjaer M, Wezenbeek E, Scattone Silva R, Kennedy JG, Butler JJ, Gomez-Florit M, Gomes ME, Snedeker JG, Dakin SG, Wildemann B. Achilles tendinopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Mar 27;11(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00602-9. PubMed 40148342 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18929686 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 28 months after the start.

Of 92 non-industry observational studies under Rupture, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 101 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 78.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 2, 2026
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
StartActual
Aug 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07869121
Lead sponsor
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Aug 3, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Carroll Jones, MD
principal investigator · OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion