CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06580899Updated Apr 6, 2026

Intra-Articular Catheter Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intra-articular catheter and Routine Standard of Care Treatment in Continuous Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular Catheter and Total Knee Arthroplasty, sponsored by OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-06.

Sponsored by OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating three groups. The groups are:

Group 1 (Control): Subjects that receive only the existing standard-of-care multimodal pain management protocol and do not receive post-operative intra-articular catheter.

Group 2 (Investigational Treatment/Intervention): Subjects that receive the brand 1 intra-articular catheter pump with existing standard-of-care multimodal pain management protocol in the immediate post-operative period.

Group 3 (Investigational Treatment/Intervention): Subjects that receive the newer brand 2 intra-articular catheter pump with existing standard-of-care multimodal pain management protocol in the immediate post-operative period.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of one of two continuous local infiltration analgesia (intra-articular catheter device) on patient postoperative pain scores following primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty in comparison to no addition of an intra-articular (IART) catheter post total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The investigators hypothesize that if patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA surgery receive an intra-articular catheter device that continuously delivers local infiltration analgesia in the postoperative period, then their postoperative pain scores on the visual analog scale will decrease. Secondary objectives will include determining the role of intraoperative tourniquet use on thigh versus knee postoperative pain and quantifying the amount of additional postoperative patient communication related to the intra-articular catheter device.

Previous literature demonstrates conflicting results on the effects of continuous local infiltration analgesia on postoperative pain management following TKA. The proposed study incorporates a well-designed and substantially powered study to directly compare patient postoperative pain scores with and without the use of an intra-articular catheter device, which will provide additional evidence and clarity to the literature.

If the intra-articular catheter is determined to provide meaningful reductions in postoperative pain, this directly benefits patients undergoing TKA surgery. Decreases in postoperative pain allow for increased patient comfort and earlier functional knee rehabilitation following surgery, both of which promote a faster recovery. A favorable intra-articular catheter study, in addition to the previous literature on continuous local infiltration analgesia, has the potential to change the previous standard of care following TKA surgery to add intra-articular catheter or similar devices as an evidence-based treatment in multimodal pain protocols. If the intra-articular catheter is determined not to provide clinically significant reductions in postoperative pain, then these devices have no substantial benefit to the patient and orthopedic surgeons can stop prescribing them. TKA surgery would become more cost-effective as the additional cost associated with the intra-articular catheter device will no longer be charged. The intraarticular intra-articular catheter patient pump has a rare, but small risk of infection due to the portal from the external environment to the knee joint. This additional catheter infection risk will be eliminated if future use of the intra-articular catheter device subsides.

02

Conditions studied

  • Continuous Local Infiltration Analgesia
  • Intra-articular Catheter
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty

Keywords

  • continuous local infiltration analgesia
  • intra-articular catheter
03

In context

Lead sponsor

OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients undergoing elective outpatient unilateral TKA at Mallard Creek Surgery Center
  2. Subjects ≥ 18 years or age
  3. Subjects willing and able to provide written informed consent to participate in this study
  4. Subjects who are indicated to use an intra-articular catheter pump system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects \< 18 years of age
  2. Subjects with history of chronic pain, neuropathic pain, or currently enrolled in pain management agreement
  3. Subjects undergoing bilateral TKA
  4. Subjects taking opiate pain medication preoperatively within 6 weeks of surgery date.
  5. Subjects allergic to any components or treatment medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
65 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    No post-operative intra-articular catheter

    Subjects that receive ONLY the existing standard of care (SOC) multimodal pain management protocol and DO NOT receive post-operative intra-articular catheter.

    Other: Routine Standard of Care Treatment

  • Active comparator
    BRAND 1 intra-articular catheter

    Subjects that receive the BRAND 1 intra-articular catheter pump with existing SOC multimodal pain management protocol in the immediate post-op period.

    Device: Intra-articular catheter

  • Active comparator
    BRAND 2 intra-articular catheter

    Subjects that receive the newer BRAND 2 intra-articular catheter pump with existing SOC multimodal pain management protocol in the immediate post-op period.

    Device: Intra-articular catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceIntra-articular catheter

    Intra-articular catheter pump with existing standard-of-care multimodal pain management protocol in the immediate post-op period

  • OtherRoutine Standard of Care Treatment

    No changes to what would occur outside of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10 scale where 10 is worse)

    Time frame: 2 days postoperative, 2 weeks postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS Jr.)

    KOOS Jr. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperative

Other outcomes

  1. Anesthesia Type

    type of anesthesia used during procedure

    Time frame: at time of surgery

  2. tourniquet times

    how long was a tourniquet used during procedure

    Time frame: at time of surgery

  3. range of motion

    knee range of motion

    Time frame: preoperative, 2 weeks postoperative, 6 weeks postoperative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3854-3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28844632 ↗
  • Li JW, Ma YS, Xiao LK. Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):755-761. doi: 10.1111/os.12535. PubMed 31663286 ↗
  • Horlocker TT. Pain management in total joint arthroplasty: a historical review. Orthopedics. 2010 Sep;33(9 Suppl):14-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-65. PubMed 20839717 ↗
  • Soffin EM, Memtsoudis SG. Anesthesia and analgesia for total knee arthroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Dec;84(12):1406-1412. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12383-2. Epub 2018 May 28. PubMed 29808972 ↗
  • Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S, Callaghan JJ. Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Feb 6;95(3):193-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01682. PubMed 23269359 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No IPD sharing

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06580899
Lead sponsor
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
Start date
Mar 14, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion