ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07837349DECLICUpdated Sep 23, 2026

Evaluation of the Clinical Value of NT-proBNP (or BNP) Measurement, Alone or in Combination With the EPOF Questionnaire, for the Screening of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) in Adults Aged 40 Years and Older Referred for a Cardiology Consultation Without Suspected CHF.

An observational study in NT-pro-BNP, NT-proBNP and CHF, sponsored by French Cardiology Society. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by French Cardiology Society · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 16 studies in Heart Failure by French Cardiology Society — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Heart Failure · French Cardiology Society.

Started
2026
the only one that year
Observational
8 of 16
1 open now
Registered
16th of 16
by date

Among the 16 studies in Heart Failure by French Cardiology Society, this one is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 8 observational ones, and was the 16th registered.

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 16 studies in Heart Failure by French Cardiology Society are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 968 Heart Failure studies recruiting now, 691 (71%) set no upper age limit and 89 (9%) stop at 75 or younger; 64 take children under 18; 96 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies in Heart Failure by French Cardiology Society, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This observational study aims to evaluate whether measuring NT-proBNP (or BNP), either on its own or alongside the EPOF questionnaire, can improve the early detection of chronic heart failure (CHF) in adults aged 40 years or over who are referred for an outpatient cardiology evaluation and have no known or suspected CHF.

The study will address the following questions:

Does systematic NT-proBNP (or BNP) testing help to identify previously unrecognised CHF? Does combining NT-proBNP (or BNP) with the EPOF questionnaire enhance diagnostic accuracy compared with using each tool alone? Participants will attend their routine cardiology consultation, complete the EPOF questionnaire and undergo NT-proBNP (or BNP) testing as part of the clinical assessment. They will also allow the collection of relevant medical data. The diagnostic performance of these tools will then be compared with the final diagnosis made by the outpatient cardiologist.

The study focuses on a population referred from primary care with increased cardiovascular risk. The early use of simple, accessible tools could reduce diagnostic delays, improve referral appropriateness and facilitate the earlier detection of CHF in general practice.

03

Conditions studied

  • NT-pro-BNP
  • NT-proBNP
  • CHF
  • Chronic Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • NT-proBNP
  • CHF
  • Chronic Heart Failure
  • Natriuretic Peptide Testing
  • BNP
  • Cardiology Consultation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults aged 40 to 80 years with no known history of chronic heart failure (CHF), referred for an outpatient cardiology consultation at participating centers for reasons other than suspected CHF or any of the four EPOF signs. Participants underwent NT-proBNP or BNP measurement as part of routine clinical care, either before or during the cardiology consultation if considered clinically indicated by the treating cardiologist. The study is observational and does not require any additional diagnostic procedures or biomarker testing beyond routine clinical practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 40 to 80 years.
  • Referred for a cardiology consultation for a reason other than suspected chronic heart failure or any of the four EPOF signs.
  • Informed about the study and not objecting to participation, in accordance with applicable regulations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known diagnosis of chronic heart failure (CHF).
  • Refusal to participate.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adults ≥40 years referred for cardiology consultation without suspected chronic heart failure

    Adults aged 40 years and older with no history of chronic heart failure (CHF), referred for a cardiology consultation at participating centers for reasons other than suspected CHF, and who underwent NT-proBNP or BNP measurement as part of routine clinical care. The biomarker measurement may have been performed before the consultation or ordered by the treating cardiologist during the consultation if considered clinically indicated, independently of study participation. The study does not require or mandate any additional NT-proBNP or BNP testing; participants are included only if a routine-care biomarker result is available.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of the combined EPOF questionnaire and natriuretic peptide strategy for detecting chronic heart failure

    Sensitivity (with 95% confidence interval) of the combined screening strategy defined as a positive EPOF questionnaire (EPOF score ≥1) and/or a positive natriuretic peptide result (NT-proBNP ≥125 ng/L or BNP ≥35 ng/L), using the final diagnosis of chronic heart failure established by the treating cardiologist after completion of the routine diagnostic work-up as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of the EPOF questionnaire

    Diagnostic performance of the EPOF questionnaire and each of its individual components, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, using the final diagnosis of chronic heart failure established by the treating cardiologist after completion of the routine diagnostic work-up as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Diagnostic performance of natriuretic peptide measurement

    Diagnostic performance of a positive natriuretic peptide result (NT-proBNP ≥125 ng/L or BNP ≥35 ng/L), including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, using the final diagnosis of chronic heart failure established by the treating cardiologist after completion of the routine diagnostic work-up as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Diagnostic performance of the combined EPOF + NT-proBNP strategy

    Diagnostic performance of the combined screening strategy defined as a positive EPOF questionnaire (EPOF score ≥1) and/or a positive NT-proBNP result (≥125 ng/L), including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, using the final diagnosis of chronic heart failure established by the treating cardiologist after completion of the routine diagnostic work-up as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Diagnostic performance of the combined EPOF + BNP strategy

    Diagnostic performance of the combined screening strategy defined as a positive EPOF questionnaire (EPOF score ≥1) and/or a positive BNP result (≥35 ng/L), including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, using the final diagnosis of chronic heart failure established by the treating cardiologist after completion of the routine diagnostic work-up as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Diagnostic performance in prespecified subgroups

    Diagnostic performance of the EPOF questionnaire, natriuretic peptide measurement, and the combined screening strategies in prespecified exploratory subgroups defined by sex (men and women), age (40-59 years and ≥60 years), and body mass index (\<30 kg/m² and ≥30 kg/m²). Diagnostic performance measures include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Prevalence of chronic heart failure

    Prevalence of chronic heart failure, defined as the proportion of participants with a final diagnosis of chronic heart failure established by the treating cardiologist after completion of the routine diagnostic work-up, reported with the corresponding 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Private Cardiology Practice
    Nîmes, 30900, France
  • Polyclinique de Poitiers - GCS ELSAN
    Poitiers, 86000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Apr 2027, 7 months later.

Of 793 non-industry observational studies under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 99. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 975 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 89.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 7, 2026
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 2027
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07837349
Lead sponsor
French Cardiology Society
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Barnabas GELLEN, MD
Contact
declic@sfcardio.fr
01 44 90 70 28 ext. +33
Marc VILLACEQUE, MD
Contact
declic@sfcardio.fr
01 44 90 70 28 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion