ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07868289Updated Oct 13, 2026

Effectiveness of Resonance Frequency Breathing Exercises in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Central Sensitization

An interventional study of Resonance Frequency Breathing and Standard Exercise Program in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Central Sensitization and Chronic Pain, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by systemic inflammation, fatigue, central sensitization, and chronic pain. While physical exercise is strongly recommended to enhance functional capacity and manage fatigue, heightened central sensitivity and pain often limit adherence and clinical gains.

Resonance frequency breathing (paced diaphragmatic breathing at 6 breaths per minute, 0.1 Hz) stimulates the baroreflex and facilitates autonomic regulation, which may alleviate central pain processing. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of resonance frequency breathing added to a standard exercise program compared with exercise alone on central sensitization, pain thresholds, fatigue, pain catastrophizing, functional capacity, respiratory muscle strength, disease activity, and quality of life in patients with SLE.

Participants will be randomly allocated to either a Standard Exercise Group or a Standard Exercise + Resonance Breathing Group for an 8-week intervention.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients diagnosed with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus will be randomized into two arms:

Control Group: Receives an 8-week multi-component standard exercise program (aerobic, resistance, range of motion, and stretching exercises).

Intervention Group: Receives the identical 8-week standard exercise program combined with slow resonance frequency breathing training at 6 breaths per minute (0.1 Hz) guided by the offline mobile application "Prana Breath".

Clinical and functional assessments will be conducted at baseline (Week 0) and at the end of the intervention (Week 8).

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
  • Central Sensitization
  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • Resonance Frequency Breathing
  • Fatigue
  • Quality of Life
  • Pain Threshold
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Pain Catastrophizing
  • Respiratory Muscle Strength
03

In context

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

1,222 studies on the registry are indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; 399 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 38 is below the median of 50 across 881 interventional studies indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

Browse Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 693 studies on the registry; 213 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) according to the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score of 40 or higher (CSI >= 40)
  • Stable medical therapy with no pharmacological regimen changes within the last 3 months
  • Willing and cognitively able to provide written informed consent and adhere to the intervention protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe cardiovascular or pulmonary contraindications that preclude safe participation in exercise or paced breathing training
  • Major surgical operation within the preceding 6 months
  • Current pregnancy
  • Active severe disease flare-up
  • Regular and ongoing practice of structured breathing exercises, pranayama, or yoga
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Exercise Group

    Participants receive an 8-week multi-component standard exercise program including aerobic exercise, progressive resistance training, range of motion, and stretching exercises. Supervised clinical sessions are conducted twice weekly, complemented by home exercises to achieve 150 minutes of weekly aerobic activity.

    Behavioral: Standard Exercise Program

  • Experimental
    Standard Exercise + Resonance Breathing Group

    Participants receive the identical 8-week standard exercise program combined with diaphragmatic resonance frequency breathing at 6 breaths per minute (0.1 Hz) with a 4:6 inhalation-to-exhalation ratio using a pursed-lip technique. Breathing practice is performed daily (10-20 min/day), guided by the offline mobile application "Prana Breath" and a printed instructional brochure.

    Behavioral: Resonance Frequency Breathing · Behavioral: Standard Exercise Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralResonance Frequency Breathing

    Diaphragmatic paced breathing at 6 breaths per minute (0.1 Hz) with a 4:6 second inhalation-to-exhalation ratio via pursed-lip technique, performed 10-20 minutes daily using the offline mobile application "Prana Breath" under a progressive motor learning framework

  • BehavioralStandard Exercise Program

    An 8-week structured exercise program comprising aerobic, progressive resistance, joint range of motion, and stretching exercises administered twice weekly under supervision and supported by home activity logs to achieve 150 minutes of weekly aerobic exercise.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) Score

    The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) assesses somatic and emotional symptoms associated with central sensitization. Part A comprises 25 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always), yielding a total score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater central sensitization severity, with a score of 40 or higher indicating the presence of central sensitivity syndromes.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)

    Pressure pain threshold is evaluated using a digital pressure algometer over symptomatic local regions and remote reference sites (e.g., upper trapezius and tibialis anterior). The pressure is applied at a continuous rate until the participant first perceives the sensation of pressure becoming painful. Measurements are recorded in kg/cm² and repeated to obtain an average value for analysis. Higher threshold values indicate lower pain sensitivity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

  2. Change in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Global Fatigue Index

    The Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) questionnaire evaluates four dimensions of fatigue: severity, distress, degree of interference with activities of daily living, and timing/frequency across 16 items. It generates a Global Fatigue Index (GFI) ranging from 1 to 50. Higher GFI scores represent greater degrees of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

  3. Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Score

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report questionnaire assessing catastrophic thoughts and feelings about pain across three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time), producing a total score between 0 and 52. Higher scores reflect greater levels of pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

  4. Change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance

    Submaximal functional exercise capacity is evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) along a flat, unobstructed 30-meter indoor corridor according to standard clinical guidelines. The total distance traversed within 6 minutes is recorded in meters. A greater walking distance indicates better functional exercise capacity

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

  5. Change in Respiratory Muscle Strength (MIP and MEP)

    Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) and Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP) are assessed using a digital respiratory pressure meter to determine inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, respectively. The maximum pressure achieved during forceful respiratory maneuvers is recorded in centimeters of water (cmH2O). Higher values indicate greater respiratory muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

  6. Change in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Questionnaire Score

    The LupusQoL is a disease-specific 34-item health-related quality of life instrument covering 8 domains: physical health, emotional health, body image, pain, planning, fatigue, intimate relationships, and burden to others. Items are rated from 0 to 4 and transformed linearly to domain scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

  7. Change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Score

    The SLEDAI is a physician-completed clinical and laboratory index consisting of 24 weighted descriptors representing active organ manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. The total score ranges from 0 to 105, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of systemic disease activity

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
    Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 7 months later.

Of 120 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 127 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2026
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07868289
Responsible party
Merve Coşan (Physiotherapist, MSc Student, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Merve Coşan, PT, MSc Candidate
Contact
merve.cosan@ogr.iuc.edu.tr
+90 535 8746765
Tuğba Çivi Karaaslan, PT, PhD
study director · Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion