ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07878845Updated Oct 16, 2026

Kinesiology Taping Versus Self-Mobilization for Neck Pain Related to Prolonged Electronic Device Use

An interventional study of Kinesiology Taping and Self-SNAG Mobilization in Neck Pain, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether kinesiology taping or self-mobilization better reduces neck pain in adults who use electronic devices for long periods each day. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does kinesiology taping or self-mobilization lead to greater reduction in neck pain after 4 weeks?
  • Do the two treatments differ in their effects on neck-related disability, neck position sense, breathing muscle strength, and upper trapezius muscle activity?

Researchers will compare kinesiology taping with self-sustained natural apophyseal glide (self-SNAG) mobilization to see which approach is more effective.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups
  • Receive kinesiology tape applied to the back of the neck every 4 days for 4 weeks, or learn and perform a towel-assisted neck self-mobilization exercise for 4 weeks
  • Receive education on posture and self-management
  • Complete assessments of pain, neck disability, neck position sense, breathing muscle strength, and neck-shoulder muscle activity at the start of the study, after 4 weeks, and 1 month later
Read the detailed description

Prolonged use of electronic devices is associated with sustained cervical flexion and altered activation of the cervicoscapular musculature, particularly the upper trapezius. Kinesiology taping and Mulligan self-mobilization are commonly used conservative approaches; however, their comparative effects on pain, cervical proprioception, respiratory muscle strength, and muscle activity in this population remain unclear.

In this single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, adults with neck pain (VAS > 3/10) and a history of electronic device use of at least 4 hours per day during the preceding year will be randomized to kinesiology taping (8 applications over 4 weeks) or self-SNAG mobilization performed with mirror-based visual feedback. Both groups will receive standardized education on posture and self-management.

Bilateral upper trapezius surface electromyography will be recorded during isometric shoulder elevation using a wireless sEMG system, with electrode placement according to SENIAM guidelines, and normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction. A bilateral upper trapezius EMG asymmetry index will be derived from the normalized right- and left-side values.

Primary and secondary outcomes will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for participants. As a pre-specified secondary analysis, the association between baseline bilateral upper trapezius EMG asymmetry and change in pain intensity will be examined, including its interaction with treatment group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Kinesiology Tape
  • Mulligan Mobilization
  • Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide
  • Surface Electromyography
  • Upper Trapezius
  • Electronic Device Use
  • Joint Position Sense
  • Respiratory Muscle Strength
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,259 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 27 is below the median of 52 across 1,026 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 693 studies on the registry; 213 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Neck pain with an intensity greater than 3 on a 10-point Visual Analog Scale
  • Use of electronic devices for at least 4 hours per day during the preceding year
  • Willingness to participate and provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical or shoulder surgery within the past 6 months
  • Previously diagnosed cervical pathology, including whiplash-associated disorder, cervical spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, or rheumatoid arthritis
  • Current use of analgesics, opioids, or corticosteroids
  • Skin allergy, open wounds, or skin lesions in the cervical region that preclude kinesiology tape application
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kinesiology Taping

    Participants receive kinesiology tape (5 cm wide, 0.5 mm thick, water-resistant) applied to the posterior cervical region in a seated neutral position. A Y-strip is applied over the cervical extensors from T1-T2 to C1-C2 with approximately 25% tension, and a second strip is applied perpendicularly across C3-C6. The tape is reapplied every 4 days by a trained physiotherapist for a total of 8 applications over 4 weeks. Participants also receive standardized education on posture and self-management.

    Device: Kinesiology Taping

  • Active comparator
    Self-SNAG Mobilization

    Participants are trained by an experienced physiotherapist to perform towel-assisted self-administered sustained natural apophyseal glide (self-SNAG) mobilization at the C5 level, with mirror-based visual feedback. The end-range rotation position is sustained for 3 seconds, with 10 repetitions per session within a pain-free range, \[frequency, e.g., once daily\] for 4 weeks. Participants also receive standardized education on posture and self-management.

    Other: Self-SNAG Mobilization

Interventions

  • DeviceKinesiology Taping

    Elastic therapeutic tape applied to the posterior cervical region (Y-strip over the cervical extensors with approximately 25% tension and a perpendicular strip across C3-C6), reapplied every 4 days for 8 applications over 4 weeks.

  • OtherSelf-SNAG Mobilization

    Towel-assisted self-administered sustained natural apophyseal glide at C5 with mirror-based visual feedback, 10 repetitions per session with 3-second end-range holds, performed over 4 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Neck Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale)

    Neck pain intensity is assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4 (end of intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Neck-Related Disability (Neck Disability Index)

    Self-reported neck-related disability is assessed using the 10-item Neck Disability Index (total score 0-50). Higher scores indicate greater disability.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 4, and week 8

  2. Change in Cervical Joint Position Sense Error

    Cervical joint position sense error is measured in centimeters using a head-mounted laser pointer and a target placed 90 cm from the seated participant, following active cervical flexion, extension, and left and right rotation. The mean deviation across five repetitions per direction is recorded. Higher values indicate poorer proprioceptive accuracy.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 4, and week 8

  3. Change in Upper Trapezius Muscle Activity (Surface Electromyography)

    Bilateral upper trapezius activity is recorded with wireless surface electromyography during isometric shoulder elevation (three 7-second contractions) and expressed as root-mean-square amplitude normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC).

    Time frame: Baseline, week 4, and week 8

  4. Bilateral Upper Trapezius EMG Asymmetry Index

    EMG asymmetry is calculated from normalized right- and left-side upper trapezius activity as \|Right - Left\| / \[(Right + Left) / 2\] x 100. A value of 0% indicates perfect symmetry; higher values indicate greater bilateral imbalance. Baseline asymmetry will be examined as a predictor of change in pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 4, and week 8

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. De-identified data may be made available from the principal investigator upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07878845
Collaborators
Bingol University
Responsible party
Emrah Zirek (Assistant Professor, Bingol University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Sep 17, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 11, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Emrah Zirek Assistant Professor, Ph. D.
Contact
ezirek@bingol.edu.tr
+905446457700

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion