CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07853001RAPTORUpdated Oct 1, 2026

Patient Reported Outcomes and Different Renal Artery Clamping Techniques During Robot Assisted Kidney Resection

An interventional study of Standard clamping strategy and Early declamping strategy in Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer), sponsored by Bjarte Almas. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Bjarte Almas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 1, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The target population for this study consists of all patients undergoing kidney surgery at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, with the primary focus being patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

The study has two main objectives. First, the investigators aim to assess whether a flank approach to robot assisted partial nephrectomy may be superior to a trans abdominal approach with regard to postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life. Second, while conducting this study, the investigators also seek to compare two methods of renal artery clamping during the partial nephrectomy procedure. Specifically, the investigators aim to determine whether a technique that reduces the duration of ischemia can be performed without causing an unacceptable increase in blood loss or postoperative complications.

Read the detailed description

Renal cell carcinoma can be managed with surgical excision, surveillance, or ablative techniques. For localized renal tumors, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become a standard treatment because it preserves renal function while maintaining oncological outcomes comparable to radical nephrectomy. Two minimally invasive surgical approaches are commonly used for RAPN: the transperitoneal approach and the retroperitoneal approach. Although both techniques are considered safe and effective, existing literature has mainly focused on perioperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, complications, and oncological results. Limited data are available regarding patient-reported outcomes, including postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life.

The RAPTOR study is a prospective clinical study designed to evaluate both patient-reported outcomes after kidney surgery and surgical outcomes associated with different renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

The first study component (PROMs arm) will compare patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the retroperitoneal approach results in reduced postoperative pain compared with the transperitoneal approach. Secondary objectives include comparisons of postoperative opioid consumption, recovery after surgery, quality of life, duration of sick leave, perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and long-term renal function.

The second study component (clamping arm) is a randomized comparison of two commonly used renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. During standard declamping, the renal artery clamp remains in place until all renorrhaphy suturing has been completed. During early declamping, the renal artery clamp is removed after closure of the resection bed but before completion of renorrhaphy. Early declamping may reduce warm ischemia time and thereby preserve renal function, but concerns remain regarding the possibility of increased bleeding. Existing evidence suggests that early declamping may reduce ischemia time without clinically relevant increases in blood loss or complications; however, high-level prospective evidence remains limited.

Patients scheduled for surgery for renal cancer at Haukeland University Hospital will be screened for eligibility. Patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy will be assigned to either a transperitoneal cohort or a retroperitoneal cohort according to tumor characteristics and surgeon preference. Patients undergoing other forms of kidney cancer surgery, including nephrectomy, will be enrolled as an observational control cohort for analyses involving patient-reported outcomes.

Within both partial nephrectomy cohorts, patients will undergo stratified block randomization in a 1:1 ratio to either early declamping or standard declamping. Randomization will occur after the surgical approach has been selected to ensure balanced allocation of declamping strategies within both surgical access groups.

Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using validated Norwegian-language instruments. Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), postoperative recovery using the Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO), and quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Assessments will be completed preoperatively (baseline), on the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery.

The primary endpoint in the PROMs arm is change in postoperative pain from baseline to postoperative day one, measured using the mean pain severity score from the Brief Pain Inventory. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, pain at 6 weeks and 1 year, postoperative recovery scores, quality-of-life scores, duration of sick leave, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, positive surgical margins, transfusions, recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and long-term renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

The primary endpoint in the clamping arm is intraoperative blood loss during partial nephrectomy. Secondary endpoints include warm ischemia time, postoperative complications, transfusions, operative time, positive surgical margins, renal function, recurrence outcomes, and survival outcomes.

Perioperative variables collected will include operative duration, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, postoperative opioid use converted to morphine equivalents, pathology findings, complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, transfusions, length of stay, renal function, and oncological outcomes. Follow-up assessments will occur at 6 weeks, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. Long-term follow-up will include recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and renal function.

The study is expected to enroll approximately 120-150 patients. Sample size calculations indicate that 88 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are required to detect a clinically meaningful difference in postoperative pain between surgical approaches and to evaluate non-inferiority of early declamping with respect to blood loss. Enrollment is expected to take approximately 2-3 years.

The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable Norwegian regulations. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrollment. The patient-reported outcomes component is observational and presents minimal risk beyond completion of questionnaires. In the randomized declamping component, both interventions represent accepted surgical techniques currently used in clinical practice. An interim analysis is planned after approximately half of the randomized participants have been enrolled to assess safety and study conduct.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)

Keywords

  • renal cell carcinoma
  • Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
  • Retroperitoneal Approach
  • Transperitoneal Approach
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Warm Ischemia Time
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Postoperative Recovery
  • Renal Function
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Early Declamping
  • Renal Artery Clamping
03

In context

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

1,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell; 378 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is above the median of 42 across 1,480 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell.

Browse Carcinoma, Renal Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Bjarte Almas as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed written informed consent obtained prior to any study specific procedures
  2. Patient must be willing and able to comply with the protocol
  3. Age >18
  4. Patients scheduled for robot-assisted partial kidney resection with either the trans- or retroperitoneal access
  5. Other patients scheduled for surgery for kidney cancer, to be included as control group

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous kidney surgery on the affected side
  2. Preexisting extensive intraabdominal adhesions preventing the use of the transabdominal access
  3. Preexisting severe pain condition requiring regular use of opioids adding up to more than equivalent of 10mg po morphine daily
  4. Any other physical or mental illness that according to the treating surgeon makes the patient unfit for inclusion in the study
  5. Confirmed metastatic renal cancer or any other metastatic cancer.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early declamping

    Participants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to early renal artery declamping. After tumor excision and closure of the resection bed, the renal artery clamp is removed before completion of renorrhaphy. This strategy is intended to reduce warm ischemia time while maintaining acceptable bleeding and complication rates.

    Procedure: Early declamping strategy

  • Active comparator
    Standard declamping

    Participants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to standard renal artery declamping. The renal clamping stays on until all renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces are completed

    Procedure: Standard clamping strategy

Interventions

  • ProcedureStandard clamping strategy

    Patients randomized to standard declamping will have the clamp on until tumour resection, renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed

  • ProcedureEarly declamping strategy

    The patients randomized to early declamping strategy will have the clamp on until tumour resection and ranorraphy is completed, but the clamp is removed before adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity score from baseline to postoperative day

    Pain severity will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. The scale measures the patients subjective assessment of pain on 15 different items. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates worst thinkable pain. The outcome measure will be calculated as the change from baseline to postoperative day 1 using the mean score of items 3-6.

    Time frame: First post operative day

  2. Intraoperative blood loss during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

    Blood loss will be measured intraoperatively in milliliters and compared between early and standard renal artery declamping strategies.

    Time frame: Day of Surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours

    Opioid administration will be converted to oral morphine equivalents and summed over the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: First postoperative day

  2. Change in Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO) score

    Recovery will be assessed using Quality of recovery 15, Norwegian version (QoR-15NO). The scale measures recovery after surgery on a 15 item scale ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is worst possible recovery, and 10 is best possible recovery. The outcome measure will be the change from baseline to postoperative day 1, at 6 weeks, and 1 year after surgery.

    Time frame: Baseline, first postoperative day, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery

  3. Change in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30)

    Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30) questionnaire. The scale measures quality of life on a 30 item scale on a range of 1 to 4 ( 1 to seven regarding items 29 and 30), where 1 is best quality of life, and 4 is worst.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery

  4. Warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

    Warm ischemia time will be measured in minutes from application to removal of the renal artery clamp.

    Time frame: Day of Surgery

  5. Incidence of postoperative complications

    Complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery

  6. Length of stay after surgery

    Measured as the number of days between surgery and discharge.

    Time frame: Between surgery and discharge, average 2 days

  7. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

    Renal function will be assessed by comparing postoperative eGFR with baseline values.

    Time frame: Baseline, first post operative day, 6 weeks, 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.

  8. Recurrence-free survival

    Time from surgery to radiologically or pathologically confirmed recurrence

    Time frame: Up to 5 Years

  9. Disease-Specific Survival

    Time from surgery to death attributable to renal cancer.

    Time frame: Up to 5 Years

  10. Overall survival

    Time from surgery to death from any cause.

    Time frame: Up to 5 Years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Haukeland University Hospital
    Bergen, Vestland 5008, Norway
    • Bjarte Almås, MD, PhD · Contact · bjarte.almas@helse-bergen.no · +4755971637
    • Karin M. Hjelle, MD, PhD · Contact · karin.margrethe.hjelle@helse-bergen.no · +4755975000
    • Bjarte Almås, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Karin M. Hjelle, MD. Associate Professor · Sub investigator
    • Rachel A. Maheswaran, MD. · Sub investigator
    • Christian Beisland, MD.Professor · Sub investigator
    • Mathias S. Æsøy, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Øyvind Ulvik, MD, Professor · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 15, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the publication will be shared beginning 12 months after primary publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07853001
Lead sponsor
Bjarte Almas
Collaborators
Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, University of Bergen
Responsible party
Bjarte Almas (MD.PhD Consultant urologist, Haukeland University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Bjarte Almås, MD, PhD
Contact
bjarte.almas@helse-bergen.no
+4755971637
Bjarte Almås, MD.PhD
principal investigator · Haukeland University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion