An interventional study of Standard clamping strategy and Early declamping strategy in Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer), sponsored by Bjarte Almas. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.
Sponsored by Bjarte Almas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The target population for this study consists of all patients undergoing kidney surgery at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, with the primary focus being patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
The study has two main objectives. First, the investigators aim to assess whether a flank approach to robot assisted partial nephrectomy may be superior to a trans abdominal approach with regard to postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life. Second, while conducting this study, the investigators also seek to compare two methods of renal artery clamping during the partial nephrectomy procedure. Specifically, the investigators aim to determine whether a technique that reduces the duration of ischemia can be performed without causing an unacceptable increase in blood loss or postoperative complications.
Renal cell carcinoma can be managed with surgical excision, surveillance, or ablative techniques. For localized renal tumors, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become a standard treatment because it preserves renal function while maintaining oncological outcomes comparable to radical nephrectomy. Two minimally invasive surgical approaches are commonly used for RAPN: the transperitoneal approach and the retroperitoneal approach. Although both techniques are considered safe and effective, existing literature has mainly focused on perioperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, complications, and oncological results. Limited data are available regarding patient-reported outcomes, including postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life.
The RAPTOR study is a prospective clinical study designed to evaluate both patient-reported outcomes after kidney surgery and surgical outcomes associated with different renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
The first study component (PROMs arm) will compare patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the retroperitoneal approach results in reduced postoperative pain compared with the transperitoneal approach. Secondary objectives include comparisons of postoperative opioid consumption, recovery after surgery, quality of life, duration of sick leave, perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and long-term renal function.
The second study component (clamping arm) is a randomized comparison of two commonly used renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. During standard declamping, the renal artery clamp remains in place until all renorrhaphy suturing has been completed. During early declamping, the renal artery clamp is removed after closure of the resection bed but before completion of renorrhaphy. Early declamping may reduce warm ischemia time and thereby preserve renal function, but concerns remain regarding the possibility of increased bleeding. Existing evidence suggests that early declamping may reduce ischemia time without clinically relevant increases in blood loss or complications; however, high-level prospective evidence remains limited.
Patients scheduled for surgery for renal cancer at Haukeland University Hospital will be screened for eligibility. Patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy will be assigned to either a transperitoneal cohort or a retroperitoneal cohort according to tumor characteristics and surgeon preference. Patients undergoing other forms of kidney cancer surgery, including nephrectomy, will be enrolled as an observational control cohort for analyses involving patient-reported outcomes.
Within both partial nephrectomy cohorts, patients will undergo stratified block randomization in a 1:1 ratio to either early declamping or standard declamping. Randomization will occur after the surgical approach has been selected to ensure balanced allocation of declamping strategies within both surgical access groups.
Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using validated Norwegian-language instruments. Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), postoperative recovery using the Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO), and quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Assessments will be completed preoperatively (baseline), on the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery.
The primary endpoint in the PROMs arm is change in postoperative pain from baseline to postoperative day one, measured using the mean pain severity score from the Brief Pain Inventory. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, pain at 6 weeks and 1 year, postoperative recovery scores, quality-of-life scores, duration of sick leave, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, positive surgical margins, transfusions, recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and long-term renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
The primary endpoint in the clamping arm is intraoperative blood loss during partial nephrectomy. Secondary endpoints include warm ischemia time, postoperative complications, transfusions, operative time, positive surgical margins, renal function, recurrence outcomes, and survival outcomes.
Perioperative variables collected will include operative duration, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, postoperative opioid use converted to morphine equivalents, pathology findings, complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, transfusions, length of stay, renal function, and oncological outcomes. Follow-up assessments will occur at 6 weeks, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. Long-term follow-up will include recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and renal function.
The study is expected to enroll approximately 120-150 patients. Sample size calculations indicate that 88 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are required to detect a clinically meaningful difference in postoperative pain between surgical approaches and to evaluate non-inferiority of early declamping with respect to blood loss. Enrollment is expected to take approximately 2-3 years.
The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable Norwegian regulations. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrollment. The patient-reported outcomes component is observational and presents minimal risk beyond completion of questionnaires. In the randomized declamping component, both interventions represent accepted surgical techniques currently used in clinical practice. An interim analysis is planned after approximately half of the randomized participants have been enrolled to assess safety and study conduct.
1,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell; 378 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 130 is above the median of 42 across 1,480 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell.
Browse Carcinoma, Renal Cell studies →This is the only study on the registry with Bjarte Almas as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to early renal artery declamping. After tumor excision and closure of the resection bed, the renal artery clamp is removed before completion of renorrhaphy. This strategy is intended to reduce warm ischemia time while maintaining acceptable bleeding and complication rates.
Procedure: Early declamping strategy
Participants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to standard renal artery declamping. The renal clamping stays on until all renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces are completed
Procedure: Standard clamping strategy
Patients randomized to standard declamping will have the clamp on until tumour resection, renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed
The patients randomized to early declamping strategy will have the clamp on until tumour resection and ranorraphy is completed, but the clamp is removed before adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity score from baseline to postoperative day
Pain severity will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. The scale measures the patients subjective assessment of pain on 15 different items. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates worst thinkable pain. The outcome measure will be calculated as the change from baseline to postoperative day 1 using the mean score of items 3-6.
Time frame: First post operative day
Intraoperative blood loss during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Blood loss will be measured intraoperatively in milliliters and compared between early and standard renal artery declamping strategies.
Time frame: Day of Surgery
Total opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours
Opioid administration will be converted to oral morphine equivalents and summed over the first 24 hours after surgery.
Time frame: First postoperative day
Change in Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO) score
Recovery will be assessed using Quality of recovery 15, Norwegian version (QoR-15NO). The scale measures recovery after surgery on a 15 item scale ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is worst possible recovery, and 10 is best possible recovery. The outcome measure will be the change from baseline to postoperative day 1, at 6 weeks, and 1 year after surgery.
Time frame: Baseline, first postoperative day, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery
Change in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30)
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30) questionnaire. The scale measures quality of life on a 30 item scale on a range of 1 to 4 ( 1 to seven regarding items 29 and 30), where 1 is best quality of life, and 4 is worst.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery
Warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Warm ischemia time will be measured in minutes from application to removal of the renal artery clamp.
Time frame: Day of Surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications
Complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Time frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Length of stay after surgery
Measured as the number of days between surgery and discharge.
Time frame: Between surgery and discharge, average 2 days
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
Renal function will be assessed by comparing postoperative eGFR with baseline values.
Time frame: Baseline, first post operative day, 6 weeks, 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.
Recurrence-free survival
Time from surgery to radiologically or pathologically confirmed recurrence
Time frame: Up to 5 Years
Disease-Specific Survival
Time from surgery to death attributable to renal cancer.
Time frame: Up to 5 Years
Overall survival
Time from surgery to death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to 5 Years
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the publication will be shared beginning 12 months after primary publication.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.