ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07709208MARCERUpdated Nov 4, 2026

Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Exercise-Induced Severe Mitral Regurgitation

An interventional study of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and Mitral valve TEER in Heart Failure - NYHA II - IV and Mitral Regurgitation Functional, sponsored by Jena University Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Jena University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Nov 4, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) can improve clinical outcomes and symptoms in heart failure patients with non-severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) at rest and exercise-induced severe SMR.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does mitral valve TEER in addition to GDMT lead to better overall clinical outcomes than GDMT alone in patients with heart failure and exercise-induced severe SMR?
  • Does mitral valve TEER reduce the risk of death, heart failure hospitalization, or worsening SMR during 12 months of follow-up compared with GDMT alone?
  • Does mitral valve TEER improve patients' quality of life compared with GDMT alone?

Participants will:

  • Undergo screening assessments to confirm eligibility for the study.
  • Be randomly assigned to receive either GDMT alone or GDMT plus mitral valve TEER.
  • Attend follow-up visits at approximately 3 time points during a 12-month follow-up period.
  • Undergo clinical evaluations that are routinely performed in patients with heart failure and SMR, including assessment of symptoms, functional status, and cardiac function.

The patients' echocardiographic data will undergo an additional centralized assessment by an independent Core Laboratory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure - NYHA II - IV
  • Mitral Regurgitation Functional

Keywords

  • secondary mitral regurgitation
  • exercise-induced severe mitral regurgitation
  • dynamic mitral regurgitation
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 246 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Jena University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mild-to-moderate (1+/2+) SMR at rest
  • Exacerbation of SMR to exercise-induced severe (3+/4+) SMR defined by at least one of the following:

    • 40 mm\^2 EROA (30 mm\^2 under low-flow condition) or
    • regurgitant volume ≥60 mL (45 mL under low-flow condition) or
    • regurgitant fraction ≥40% or
    • increase by 13 mm\^2 EROA from rest to exercise
  • Increase in natriuretic peptides defined as NT-proBNP:

    • >250 pg/ml (Sinus rhythm) or
    • >600 pg/ml (Atrial fibrillation) or
    • HF hospitalization within 12 months prior to screening (defined as HF listed as the major reason for hospitalization)
  • class II-IV
  • Stable HF medication regimen (GDMT) for at least 30 days prior to index procedure
  • Patient deemed appropriate candidate for TEER by the local multidisciplinary heart team
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalization in past three months due to myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and/or unstable angina
  • LVEDD >70 mm
  • \<20%
  • Evidence of or stroke within three months prior to intervention
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention in the last 30 days
  • Subjects expected to require any cardiac surgery, including surgery for coronary artery disease or for pulmonic, aortic, or tricuspid valve disease within one year
  • Presence of primary renal dysfunction or significantly compromised renal function ( \<30 ml/min)
  • Severe right ventricular failure
  • Severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area \<1.0 cm\^2) or aortic regurgitation
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart circulatory support
  • Presence of a mechanical mitral heart valve, mitral bioprosthetic valve or mitral annuloplasty ring, indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  • Active endocarditis or infections requiring current antibiotic therapy
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, or any other structural heart disease causing HF other than SMR
  • Inability to exercise
  • Pregnancy or planning pregnancy within next12 months
  • \<12 months (judgement of investigator)
  • Anticipated need of left ventricular assist device within next 12 months
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial (primary endpoint not yet reached) during this trial or within 30 days prior to enrolment into this trial
  • Previous participation in this trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
246 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT)

    Participants receive GDMT according to current heart failure and valvular heart disease guidelines.

    Other: Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)

  • Experimental
    Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) + mitral valve TEER

    Participants receive GDMT plus mitral valve TEER

    Procedure: Mitral valve TEER

Interventions

  • OtherGuideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)

    Participants receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) according to current clinical practice guidelines. Medical treatment may include optimized pharmacological therapy such as beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARBs/ARNI, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, diuretics, SGLT2-inhibitors and other indicated medications. Treatment is adjusted based on clinical status and treating physician judgment.

  • ProcedureMitral valve TEER

    Participants receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) according to current clinical practice guidelines in combination with TEER of the mitral valve using the PASCAL Precision system (Edwards Lifesciences Sàrl). The procedure is performed via a minimally invasive transcatheter approach through femoral venous access to reduce SMR. Guideline-directed medical therapy is continued and optimized throughout follow-up according to standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Four-step hierarchical composite primary endpoint; win ratio based on the following parameters: time to all-cause mortality at 12 months, time to first HF hospitalization, SMR progression (3+/4+) at rest, change in KCCQ score from baseline to 12 months.

    The primary outcome is a single aggregated, unitless win ratio based on a four-step hierarchical composite primary endpoint at 12 months. Each patient in the GDMT+mitral valve TEER group will be compared with each patient in the GDMT group with respect to the following parameters in the following order: 1. time to all-cause mortality, days 2. time to first heart failure hospitalization, days 3. secondary mitral regurgitation progression (3+/4+) at rest and 4. change in KCCQ score from baseline to 12 months, where higher improvement or less deterioration wins; differences between patients less than 5 points are treated as ties (i.e. a between-patient threshold of 5 pts., KCCQ-values range from 0 to 100, higher values indicating better health). For each pairwise comparison, the first non-tied component determines a win for one group or a tie. The win ratio is the number of wins in the GDMT+ mitral valve TEER group divided by the number of wins in the GDMT group.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with cardiovascular death

    Death due to cardiovascular causes during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of participants with heart failure hospitalization

    Hospitalization due to worsening heart failure requiring inpatient treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of participants with myocardial infarction

    Occurrence of myocardial infarction during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of participants with stroke

    Occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  6. Change from baseline in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) score

    General health-related quality of life assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, including physical and mental component summary scores.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  7. Number of participants requiring mitral valve surgery

    Occurrence of surgical mitral valve intervention during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Change from baseline in secondary mitral regurgitation severity grade according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) criteria at rest

    Secondary mitral regurgitation severity will be assessed at rest by transthoracic echocardiography according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) criteria using a 4-grade scale: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (moderate-to-severe), and Grade 4 (severe). Severity grading will be based on an integrated assessment of echocardiographic parameters, including effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RVol), and regurgitant fraction (RF).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  9. Change from baseline in left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi)

    Left ventricular end-systolic volume index measured by echocardiography.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  10. Change from baseline in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi)

    Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index measured by echocardiography.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  11. Change from baseline in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (SPAP)

    Pulmonary artery systolic pressure assessed by echocardiography.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  12. Change from baseline in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class

    Heart failure functional status assessed using NYHA classification.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  13. Change from baseline in six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance

    Exercise capacity assessed using the six-minute walk test.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

  14. Change from baseline in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro Brain natriuretic peptide, pg/ml) (alternatively calculated from BNP, Brain natriuretic peptide, pg/ml)

    Heart failure biomarkers measured in blood samples.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of participants with all-cause mortality

    Death from any cause during the study follow-up period.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of participants with procedure-related complications during TEER

    Complications occurring during or immediately after the TEER procedure.

    Time frame: During procedure

  3. Number of participants requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device-related complications

    Emergency or unplanned cardiovascular surgery related to the device or procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of participants with endocarditis

    Occurrence of infective endocarditis during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Number of participants with major bleeding (TIMI criteria)

    Major bleeding events defined according to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding criteria, including fatal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or clinically significant bleeding associated with a drop in hemoglobin ≥5 g/dL or hematocrit ≥15%.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Number of participants with cardiac tamponade

    Occurrence of pericardial tamponade.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Department of Cardiology, Pneumology and Vascular Medicine University Hospital Düsseldorf
    Düsseldorf, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Department of Internal Medicine I (KIM I) Division of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medical Care Jena University Hospital
    Jena, Germany
    Recruiting
08

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 5, 2026
Sites
2 sites changed recruiting status (2 now recruiting)
Show 2 sites
  • Department of Cardiology, Pneumology and Vascular Medicine University Hospital Düsseldorf · Düsseldorf, Germanyno status→Recruiting
  • Department of Internal Medicine I (KIM I) Division of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medical Care Jena University Hospital · Jena, Germanyno status→Recruiting
across 2 updates, Oct 5, 2026 – Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026→Sep 16, 2026 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Department of Cardiology, Pneumology and Vascular Medicine University Hospital Düsseldorf is now Recruiting
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    2 sites changed recruiting status (1 now not yet recruiting, 1 now recruiting)
    Show 2 sites
    • Department of Cardiology, Pneumology and Vascular Medicine University Hospital Düsseldorf · Düsseldorf, Germanyno status→Not yet recruiting
    • Department of Internal Medicine I (KIM I) Division of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medical Care Jena University Hospital · Jena, Germanyno status→Recruiting
    Start date Aug 2026→Sep 16, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07709208
Lead sponsor
Jena University Hospital
Responsible party
Christian Schulze (Director of Department of Internal Medicine I at Jena University Hospital and Professor of Medicine at Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
Start date
Sep 16, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Christian Schulze, Prof. Dr.
Contact
christian.schulze@med.uni-jena.de
+49 3641 9 324101
Maximilian Spieker, PD Dr.
Contact
maximilian.spieker@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
+49 211 / 81 18914
Christian Schulze, Prof. Dr.
study director · University Hospital Jena
Maximilian Spieker, PD Dr.
study director · Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion