ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07830914Updated Sep 22, 2026

ERAS Protocol for Cesarean Delivery in Women With Placenta Previa

An interventional study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Conventional perioperative care in Placenta Previa, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols on maternal outcomes patient satisfaction and length of hospital stay following cesarean delivery in women with placenta previa. Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery for placenta previa will be managed either with a standardized ERAS pathway or with conventional routine perioperative care.

Read the detailed description

Placenta previa is associated with significant maternal morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways include patient education preoperative fasting optimization multimodal analgesia early oral intake early mobilization and early urinary catheter removal. This prospective study will include women with singleton pregnancy and sonographic diagnosis of placenta previa scheduled for elective cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital. Group A will receive ERAS pathway and Group B will receive conventional care. Outcomes including length of hospital stay postoperative pain time to ambulation time to oral intake and patient satisfaction will be compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Placenta Previa

Keywords

  • Patient satisfaction
  • ERAS
  • Enhanced Recovery
  • Placenta Previa
  • Length of stay
  • Assiut
03

In context

Placenta Previa

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Placenta Previa; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 109 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Placenta Previa.

Browse Placenta Previa studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Sonographic diagnosis of placenta previa
  • Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery
  • Ability to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe medical diseases affecting postoperative recovery including hypertension and diabetes mellitus
  • Hemodynamic instability before surgery
  • ICU admission immediately after surgery
  • Refusal to participate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ERAS Group

    Women managed according to the standardized ERAS pathway including preoperative education fasting 2 hours for clear fluids multimodal analgesia early oral intake early mobilization and early urinary catheter removal

    Other: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Care Group

    Women managed with routine perioperative care currently practiced in the department

    Other: Conventional perioperative care

Interventions

  • OtherEnhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol

    Standardized ERAS pathway for cesarean delivery including preoperative counseling, clear fluids allowed up to 2 hours and solid food fasting for 6 hours, optimization of hemoglobin, multimodal analgesia with scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with limited opioids, prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting, early oral fluid and solid intake, early mobilization with sitting and standing and ambulation within 6 to 12 hours, early Foley catheter removal within 12 hours when clinically feasible, and standardized discharge planning. This intervention is applied only to the Experimental Arm.

  • OtherConventional perioperative care

    Routine conventional perioperative care currently practiced at Assiut University Hospital including traditional preoperative fasting, standard analgesia, usual timing of oral intake, mobilization and urinary catheter removal according to physician preference.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Duration of hospital stay measured in hours from end of cesarean delivery to hospital discharge

    Time frame: Up to 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain score at 6 hours

    Pain score assessed using 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst imaginable pain with higher scores indicating worse pain

    Time frame: At 6 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative pain score at 24 hours

    Pain score assessed using 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst imaginable pain with higher scores indicating worse pain

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

  3. Time to first ambulation

    Time in hours from end of surgery to first ambulation

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  4. Time to first oral intake

    Time in hours from end of surgery to first oral fluid intake

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  5. Time to urinary catheter removal

    Time in hours from end of surgery to Foley catheter removal

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  6. Postpartum hemorrhage

    Number of participants who develop postpartum hemorrhage with blood loss greater than 1000 milliliters

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  7. Requirement for blood transfusion

    Number of participants who require packed red blood cells transfusion

    Time frame: Up to 7 days

  8. Patient satisfaction score

    Score on the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire scale ranges from 0 to 150 with higher scores indicating better recovery and satisfaction

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 12 months later.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Placenta Previa, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2026
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 25, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 10, 2028
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830914
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Ahmed Mostafa Adly Embaby (Resident Physician, Obstetrics and Gynecology department, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 25, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 10, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Ahmed M Adly, Resident
Contact
Ahmed.18313583@med.aun.edu.eg
01015727207
Ahmed A Abdel-Aleem, prof
study chair · Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Assiut University Hospital Assiut Egypt

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion