ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07677670FS2Updated Sep 15, 2026

AI Blind-Sweep Ultrasound for Antenatal Screening by Non-Specialist Health Workers in Rural DR Congo

An observational study in Antenatal Care, Maternal Health and Gestational Age, sponsored by SOIK Corporation Sarl. Recruiting at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by SOIK Corporation Sarl · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

FS2 evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and implementation feasibility of an AI-assisted blind-sweep obstetric ultrasound (SPAQ E-con AI), operated by trained non-specialist health workers, for antenatal screening in rural Democratic Republic of the Congo. Primary outcomes are gestational age mean absolute error (Trimester 2 and Trimester 3) with 95% confidence intervals and AI confidence calibration. The reference standard is manual measurement by a reference reader (early ultrasound first; manual BPD if unavailable; last menstrual period is not used). Planned enrollment is approximately 1,380: Batch 1 (closed, 80 enrolled) and Batch 2 (approximately 1,300), within an IRB-approved ceiling of 3,000. Early termination is permitted upon achievement of pre-specified analysis-plan thresholds. The study is a multi-center prospective Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation design and includes a pre-specified adaptive model-update (Batch 2 cut) plan following FDA PCCP and STARD-AI guidance.

Read the detailed description

Study conduct is organised in Batches. Batch 1 (Centre de Sante CBCO, Kenge health zone, Kwango province) enrolled 80 participants, of whom 78 had complete datasets, and is closed. Batch 2 is planned at approximately 1,300 participants. The confirmatory analysis cut is approximately 130 to 160 cases acquired with a model frozen before collection, comprising a core set of 80 to 100, an early-gestation enrichment of 25 to 30, and an upper-gestational-age enrichment of 25 to 30. Enrolment may stop early once the pre-specified confidence-interval criteria for the two primary gestational-age outcomes are met. The registered enrolment ceiling of 3,000 is unchanged.

Sites are facilities of the Kenge health zone, Kwango province, within the perimeter already approved in the protocol (up to 6 facilities plus 2 to 5 village outreach sites).

Eligibility follows the protocol: pregnant women aged 18 years or older. Multiple pregnancies are eligible.

Two sub-cohorts address the bounds of the gestational-age range. The early sub-cohort (crown-rump length 7 to 84 mm, approximately under 14 weeks) draws on the same source population as Cohort B-2 and is recruited through community health worker (RECO) village outreach and neighbouring health facilities; it is reported descriptively. The upper-bound sub-cohort (35 weeks or more) is a separate validation subset, recruited in parallel and analysed separately; sensitivity and specificity are reported, and positive and negative predictive values are not reported because prevalence in this subset is artificial.

The registered Trimester 3 estimation window (28 to 36 weeks) is unchanged. In Batch 2, point estimates are reported for 28 to 34 weeks, and 35 to 36 weeks is handled as "to be confirmed / refer". This is an operational reporting restriction, not a change to the registered window.

The AI model is identified and frozen before each Batch and recorded in a model and application version registry under a pre-determined change control plan. Results are reported by frozen version. AI inference is not used for clinical decision-making.

02

Conditions studied

  • Antenatal Care
  • Maternal Health
  • Gestational Age
  • Placenta Praevia
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • blind sweep ultrasound
  • artificial intelligence
  • point-of-care ultrasound
  • task-shifting
  • DRC
03

In context

Placenta Previa

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Placenta Previa; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,000 is above the median of 100 across 32 observational studies indexed under Placenta Previa.

Browse Placenta Previa studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with SOIK Corporation Sarl as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women attending routine antenatal care at participating facilities or identified through community health worker (RECO) village outreach in the Kenge health zone, Kwango province, DRC.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women aged 18 years or older
  • Identified at a participating facility routine ANC visit or RECO village outreach within the Kenge health zone catchment
  • Written obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency presentation
  • Duplicate re-registration of an already-enrolled woman
  • Lacking capacity to consent
  • Planned relocation outside Kwango province during the study period
  • Refusal of consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort A

    Natural enrollment / Description: Consecutive ANC attendees (natural prevalence)

    Diagnostic Test: SPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound

  • Cohort B-1 Placenta/malpresentation enriched

    Enriched validation subset for placenta praevia and fetal malpresentation

    Diagnostic Test: SPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound

  • Cohort B-2 - Trimester 1 (CRL/GS) enriched

    Enriched trimester 1 cases for CRL/GS gestational age models

    Diagnostic Test: SPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound

  • Cohort B-3 - Early gestation (CRL 7-84 mm) enriched

    Early-gestation enrichment sub-cohort: crown-rump length 7-84 mm, approximately under 14 weeks of gestation. Drawn from the same source population as Cohort B-2 and recruited through community health worker (RECO) village outreach and neighbouring health facilities. Reported descriptively.

    Diagnostic Test: SPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound

  • Cohort B-4 - Upper gestational-age bound (>=35 weeks) validation subset

    Validation subset at the upper bound of the gestational-age range (35 weeks of gestation or more), recruited in parallel with the main cohort and analysed separately. Sensitivity and specificity are reported. Positive and negative predictive values are not reported, because prevalence in this subset is artificial.

    Diagnostic Test: SPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSPAQ E-con AI blind-sweep ultrasound

    Smartphone-based 9-sweep obstetric ultrasound with AI estimation of gestational age, fetal presentation, and placenta location, operated by trained non-specialist health workers after 30-60 minutes of training. The AI model is frozen before each Batch and managed in a version registry under a pre-determined change control plan (PCCP); AI inference is not used for clinical decision-making.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gestational age mean absolute error (MAE), Trimester 2 (14-27 weeks)

    MAE in days vs reference standard, with 95% CI; target MAE ≤7 days and upper 95% CI ≤10 days

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  2. Gestational age mean absolute error (MAE), Trimester 3 (28-36 weeks)

    MAE in days vs reference standard, with 95% CI; target MAE ≤10 days and upper 95% CI ≤14 days

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  3. AI confidence calibration - Expected Calibration Error (ECE)

    Expected Calibration Error from the reliability diagram of AI confidence versus reference-standard agreement; target \<=0.05

    Time frame: At Batch 1 closure, up to 8 weeks

  4. AI confidence calibration - Brier score

    Brier score of AI confidence versus reference-standard agreement; target \<=0.20

    Time frame: At Batch 1 closure, up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trimester 1 gestational age MAE (CRL and GS models)

    Integrated Cohort A T1 + Cohort B-2, N=30; CRL model MAE ≤5 days or GS model MAE ≤7 days

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  2. Placenta praevia and fetal malpresentation sensitivity and specificity

    Observed sensitivity/specificity with 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson) on enriched validation subset (Cohort B-1, target N=20-25); reported as observed values

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  3. Inter-rater reliability of gestational age - Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)

    ICC(2,1) between two independent readers for gestational age in days

    Time frame: During the inter-rater assessment window, up to 1 week

  4. Inter-rater reliability of placenta praevia classification - Cohen's kappa

    Cohen's kappa for placenta praevia (yes/no) between two independent readers

    Time frame: During the inter-rater assessment window, up to 1 week

  5. Inter-rater reliability of fetal presentation classification - weighted kappa

    Linear weighted kappa for fetal presentation category between two independent readers

    Time frame: During the inter-rater assessment window, up to 1 week

  6. Acceptability - Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score

    Mean AIM score (4-item, 5-point Likert) among health workers

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  7. Feasibility - ultrasound throughput (scans per device per day)

    Number of scans completed per device per day; target \>=15

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  8. Fidelity - protocol adherence rate (5-item checklist)

    Percentage adherence on a 5-item fidelity checklist; target \>=80%

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  9. Penetration - proportion of eligible women screened

    Percentage of eligible women in the catchment screened with AI ultrasound

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months

  10. Sustainability - intention to continue use

    Percentage of staff reporting intention to continue use at the end-of-study interview

    Time frame: At study completion, up to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre de Sante CBCO
    Kenge, Kwango, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 15 observational studies under Placenta Previa, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2026
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
StartActual
Jun 19, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 13, 2027
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07677670
Lead sponsor
SOIK Corporation Sarl
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Start date
Jun 19, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 13, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Kuniyuki Furuta
Contact
furuta@soik.co.jp
+818099740409
Kuniyuki Furuta
principal investigator · SOIK Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion