ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07829354Updated Sep 21, 2026

Pilates Method vs. Kinesiotherapy for Occupational Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Pilates Method and Conventional Kinesiotherapy in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2023, registered Sep 2026).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil — 10 open to participants now, 12 under way, none of them phase 3. Low Back Pain · Brazil.

Enrollment
115th of 122
18 · median 66
Started
2023
with 4 others
No phase
101 of 125
9 open now
Registered
125th of 125
by date

Among the 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil, this one is the 115th largest by enrollment of the 122 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2023, is one of 101 with no phase, and was the 125th registered.

Low Back Pain

2,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 579 are open to participants now.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Open to participants now

10 of the 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

All 10 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Brazil have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Brazil →

Who these studies take

Of the 332 Low Back Pain studies recruiting now, 92 (28%) set no upper age limit and 210 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 46 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 125 studies in Low Back Pain with a site in Brazil, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Occupational low back pain is a prevalent cause of functional disability. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of the Pilates Method and conventional kinesiotherapy on functional disability (Oswestry Index) and health self-perception in workers with occupational low back pain.

Read the detailed description

The study enrolled 18 workers diagnosed with occupational low back pain. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: the Pilates Method or conventional kinesiotherapy. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed at baseline and post-intervention to assess the therapeutic outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pilates
  • Kinesiotherapy
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Occupational Health
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Workers diagnosed with occupational low back pain.
  • Aged between18 and older
  • Signed the Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of spinal surgery.
  • Presence of severe spinal pathologies (e.g., tumors, fractures, infections).
  • Pregnancy.
  • Currently participating in another physical rehabilitation program for low back pain.
  • Cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of the questionnaires or exercises.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pilates Method

    Participants underwent a rehabilitation protocol based on the Pilates Method.

    Other: Pilates Method

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Kinesiotherapy

    Participants underwent a conventional kinesiotherapy exercise protocol.

    Other: Conventional Kinesiotherapy

Interventions

  • OtherPilates Method

    A rehabilitation program utilizing the Pilates Method principles focusing on core stability, flexibility, and muscle strengthening.

  • OtherConventional Kinesiotherapy

    A standard physical therapy program involving stretching and strengthening exercises commonly used in clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Disability

    Functional disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome (greater level of disability).

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks, and 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health Self-Perception

    Health self-perception was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale asking participants to rate their physical and emotional health over the last month. The score for each question ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome (1 = Very good; 2 = Good; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Bad; 5 = Very bad).

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks, and 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Physical Therapy Clinic, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro
    Uberaba, Minas Gerais 38025-015, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2023 to primary completion in Aug 2023, 5 months.

Of 1,231 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 26. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,286 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2026
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07829354
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro
Responsible party
Antonio Fernando Mardegan Filho (MD, MSc, Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2023
Completion
Aug 31, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Dernival Bertoncello, PT, PhD
principal investigator · Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion