ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07827495Updated Sep 18, 2026

Synchronous vs Asynchronous Telerehabilitation for Bruxism

An interventional study of Synchronous Telerehabilitation Protocol and Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Protocol in Bruxism and Sleep Bruxism, sponsored by Gazi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Primary conditionSleep BruxismRegistry: BruxismReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Bruxism — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sleep Bruxism
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Sleep Bruxism, a narrower term within Bruxism.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2025, registered Sep 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial was to learn if online exercise and self-massage programs could lower pain and improve jaw movement in adults with bruxism (teeth grinding or clenching). The main questions it aimed to answer were:

Did live video exercise guided by a physical therapist lower jaw pain more than an independent video exercise program? Did live video exercise guided by a physical therapist improve mouth opening more than an independent video exercise program? Researchers compared live video sessions to independent video exercises to see which approach worked better for improving jaw function, sleep quality, and daily life.

Participants:

Completed an 8-session exercise and self-massage program over 4 weeks (2 times each week).

Either practiced live with a physical therapist over video calls or followed recorded video exercises on their own at home.

Answered surveys about pain, sleep quality, and oral health before and after the 4-week program.

Had their mouth opening, jaw muscle sensitivity, and muscle activity tested before and after the program.

Read the detailed description

Bruxism is characterized by repetitive masticatory muscle activity leading to masticatory muscle pain, restricted mandibular range of motion, and impaired oral health-related quality of life. Telerehabilitation represents a promising alternative to conventional face-to-face physiotherapy to overcome accessibility barriers.

In this prospective, randomized, two-arm parallel-group controlled trial, individuals diagnosed with clinically-based bruxism were randomly assigned to either the Synchronous Telerehabilitation Group (S-TRG) or the Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Group (A-TRG).

Both groups completed an 8-session intervention protocol over 4 weeks (2 sessions per week). The intervention protocol comprised:

Breathing training protocol (deep diaphragmatic breathing), Cervical region stretching and chin-tuck exercises, Temporomandibular joint range of motion and stretching exercises, Bilateral self-massage techniques (sliding, kneading, friction, and ischemic compression to masseter and temporalis muscles), Scapular stabilization exercises (W, T, and Y exercises).

In the S-TRG, sessions were conducted in real time under the direct supervision of a physiotherapist via live video calls. In the A-TRG, participants were taught the exercises in an initial recorded live video session and subsequently performed the protocol independently using their personalized instructional video recordings, with weekly phone/text check-ins to monitor adherence and screen for adverse events. Additionally, all participants received a standardized patient education brochure on TMJ care and behavioral modifications.

Outcome assessments were conducted at baseline and immediately following the 4-week intervention period. Evaluated parameters included:

Pain intensity assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest, during the night, in the morning, and during activity, Maximum mouth opening (MMO) measured with a caliper, Pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pressure pain tolerance (PPTol) of the masseter and temporalis anterior muscles assessed using a digital algometer, Masticatory muscle activation during maximum voluntary isometric contraction and clenching tasks assessed via surface electromyography (sEMG), Oral health-related quality of life evaluated using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), Subjective sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

02

Conditions studied

  • Bruxism
  • Sleep Bruxism

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Telerehabilitation
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Self-Massage
  • Temporomandibular Disorder
  • Electromyography
03

In context

Sleep Bruxism Reclassified

62 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Bruxism; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 39 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Bruxism.

Browse Sleep Bruxism studies →

Lead sponsor

Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 551 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Compared within Sleep Bruxism, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Bruxism. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with clinically-based bruxism
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Voluntarily agreed to participate and provided written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior or concurrent neurological, psychiatric, or systemic diseases
  • Ongoing dental treatment
  • Currently receiving physical therapy
  • Regular use of medications such as analgesics or muscle relaxants
  • History of surgery or trauma involving the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) or neck region
  • Pregnancy
  • Active cancer
  • Planned surgical procedures
  • Visual, auditory, or cognitive impairments that could potentially confound the study outcomes
  • History of receiving treatment for the TMJ within the preceding 3 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Synchronous Telerehabilitation Group (S-TRG)

    Participants completed an 8-session therapeutic exercise and self-massage program over 4 weeks (2 sessions per week) via real-time live video calls under the direct supervision of a physiotherapist. They also received TMJ patient education and behavioral modification brochures.

    Behavioral: Synchronous Telerehabilitation Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Group (A-TRG)

    Participants were taught the same 8-session exercise and self-massage protocol in an initial live recorded video session and subsequently performed the exercises independently at home for 4 weeks using personalized video recordings, supported by weekly check-ins. They also received TMJ patient education and behavioral modification brochures.

    Behavioral: Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Protocol

Interventions

  • BehavioralSynchronous Telerehabilitation Protocol

    Real-time video-supervised protocol consisting of diaphragmatic breathing, cervical stretching, TMJ range of motion and self-stretching, bilateral masseter/temporalis self-massage, scapular stabilization exercises, and TMJ education brochure (8 sessions over 4 weeks).

  • BehavioralAsynchronous Telerehabilitation Protocol

    Video-recorded home protocol consisting of identical diaphragmatic breathing, cervical stretching, TMJ range of motion/self-stretching, bilateral self-massage, scapular exercises, and TMJ education brochure performed independently with weekly check-ins (8 sessions over 4 weeks).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity

    Assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Pain intensity is evaluated at rest, during the night, in the morning upon waking, and during jaw activity/function.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Maximum Mouth Opening (MMO)

    Maximum active mouth opening without pain measured in centimeters (cm) using a caliper between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

  2. Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)

    Assessed in pounds (lb) using a digital algometer (1 cm² probe) over the bilateral masseter and anterior temporalis muscles to determine the minimum force at which pressure sensation transitions into pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

  3. Change in Pressure Pain Tolerance (PPTol)

    Assessed in pounds (lb) using a digital algometer (1 cm² probe) over the bilateral masseter and anterior temporalis muscles to determine the maximum level of pressure pain tolerated.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

  4. Change in Masticatory Muscle Activity (sEMG)

    Assessed via surface electromyography (sEMG) to evaluate muscle activation of the masseter and temporalis anterior muscles during maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and clenching tasks.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

  5. Change in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHIP-14)

    Evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Total scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating poorer oral health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

  6. Change in Subjective Sleep Quality (PSQI)

    Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The global score ranges from 0 to 21, with scores greater than 5 indicating poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (Week 4)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 8 months.

Of 19 interventional studies with no phase under Sleep Bruxism, half reached primary completion within 6 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 13. This study's 8 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
StartActual
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07827495
Lead sponsor
Gazi University
Responsible party
Gamze COBANOGLU (Assistant Professor, Gazi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026
Completion
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion