ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07827222Updated Sep 18, 2026

Gemini Flash 3.6 Versus Human Observers for FIGO-Based Interpretation of Intrapartum Cardiotocography

An observational study in Fetal Hypoxia, Fetal Distress and Low Apgar Score, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
415
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cardiotocography (CTG) is the standard method for monitoring fetal heart rate and uterine contractions during labor to detect signs of fetal hypoxia. However, human CTG interpretation is often subjective and subject to high interobserver variability, even among experienced clinicians. Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) models have emerged as potential diagnostic aids capable of evaluating CTG tracings. This prospective diagnostic accuracy study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Gemini Flash 3.6 in interpreting intrapartum CTG recordings according to the 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines, and to compare its accuracy directly against independent human expert obstetricians.

Participants include pregnant women admitted in active labor at term with a singleton cephalic pregnancy undergoing continuous CTG monitoring. De-identified digital images of the final 60 minutes of CTG tracing prior to delivery will be independently evaluated by Gemini Flash 3.6 and three expert obstetricians. Each evaluator will classify the tracings into one of three FIGO categories: Normal, Suspicious, or Pathological. All evaluators will be blinded to clinical details, delivery outcomes, and other observers' interpretations.

The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of Gemini Flash 3.6 in identifying neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score less than 7. Secondary objectives include comparing the diagnostic performance of the AI model with that of individual expert obstetricians, measuring interobserver agreement among all raters, and assessing associations with 1-minute Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood gas parameters. The AI model will be used solely as an investigational research tool, and its evaluations will not be available to the clinical team or used to guide patient care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fetal Hypoxia
  • Fetal Distress
  • Low Apgar Score
  • Neonatal Acidemia

Keywords

  • Cardiotocography
  • Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring
  • Electronic Fetal Monitoring
  • FIGO Classification
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Large Language Models
  • Gemini Flash
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Interobserver Agreement
  • Apgar Score
03

In context

Fetal Hypoxia

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Hypoxia; 6 are open to participants now.

Browse Fetal Hypoxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women admitted in active labor at term (gestational age 37+0 weeks or greater) with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation undergoing routine continuous intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring at Abutig Specialized Hospital and Women's Health Hospital, Assiut University, Egypt.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Gestational age 37+0 weeks or greater
  • Cephalic fetal presentation
  • Admission to the labor ward in active labor
  • Continuous intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring
  • Availability of an interpretable CTG tracing immediately preceding delivery
  • Availability of documented 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores
  • Written obtained prior to enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Major fetal congenital anomalies
  • Antepartum stillbirth
  • Elective cesarean delivery performed before the onset of labor without an adequate intrapartum CTG tracing
  • CTG tracing with inadequate technical quality, including signal loss of 15% or greater
  • Missing 5-minute Apgar score
  • Technical problems preventing standardized CTG image preparation or interpretation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
415 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Intrapartum CTG Monitoring Cohort

    Women with singleton term pregnancies (gestational age ≥ 37 + 0 weeks) in cephalic presentation admitted to the labor ward in active labor who undergo routine continuous intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring immediately preceding delivery. De-identified digital CTG tracings from this cohort are independently evaluated by Gemini Flash 3.6 and three expert obstetricians according to the 2015 FIGO consensus guidelines, and validated against neonatal outcomes including 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores as well as umbilical artery blood-gas analysis where available.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of Gemini Flash 3.6 for Identifying Neonates With a 5-Minute Apgar Score Less Than 7

    Sensitivity is defined as the percentage of neonates with a confirmed 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 who are correctly identified as having a "Pathological" CTG tracing by Gemini Flash 3.6. Intrapartum CTG tracings from the final 60 minutes of labor immediately preceding delivery are interpreted according to the 2015 FIGO guidelines. For binary diagnostic performance analysis, a "Pathological" CTG represents a positive test result, while "Normal" and "Suspicious" CTGs represent negative test results. Sensitivity is calculated as \[True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives)\] \* 100 and reported with a 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: 5 minutes after birth

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 2027
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07827222
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Abdelrhman Ahmed Kamel (Resident of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion