ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05681624MOXYUpdated Aug 10, 2026

Maternal Oxygen Supplementation for Intrauterine Resuscitation

An interventional study of Maternal oxygen supplementation and Room air in Fetal Distress, Fetal Hypoxia and Labor and Delivery Complication, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,252
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

More than 80% of the 3 million women who labor and deliver each year in the United States undergo continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) during labor in order to fetal hypoxia and prevent the transition to acidemia, expedited operative delivery, and/or neonatal morbidity. Category II EFM is the most commonly observed group of fetal heart rate features in labor. One common response to Category II EFM is maternal oxygen (O2) supplementation. The theoretic rationale for O2 administration is that it increases O2 transfer to a hypoxic fetus. There are conflicting national guidelines regarding O2 administration - the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists suggest O2 is ineffective, whereas the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses recommend continued use given lack of definitive data on safety and efficacy. A recent national survey of nearly 600 Labor \& Delivery providers in February 2022 revealed that 49% still use O2 . Thus, there remains equipoise on the topic and high-quality data on the safety of intrapartum O2 is needed. None of the trials to date have studied the effect of intrapartum O2 on important clinical measures of neonatal or maternal morbidity. This safety data is imperative because the field of obstetrics must hold supplemental O2 to the same rigorous standards applied to any drug used in pregnancy. Without data on these definitive outcomes, it will be challenging to implement evidence-based recommendations for supplemental O2 use on Labor \& Delivery. The investigators will conduct a large, multicenter, randomized noninferiority trial of O2 supplementation versus room air in patients with Category II EFM in labor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fetal Distress
  • Fetal Hypoxia
  • Labor and Delivery Complication
03

In context

Fetal Distress

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Distress; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,252 is above the median of 116 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Fetal Distress.

Browse Fetal Distress studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton gestation
  • Gestational age>=37 weeks
  • Spontaneous labor or induction of labor
  • English or spanish speaking
  • Planned continuous fetal monitoring

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm gestation
  • Major fetal anomaly
  • Multiple gestation
  • Category III fetal monitoring at time of admission
  • Maternal hypoxia \<95%
  • Planned or scheduled cesarean delivery Excluded from randomization if receiving nitrous oxide for analgesia at time of randomization.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,252 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Oxygen

    Other: Maternal oxygen supplementation

  • Active comparator
    Room air

    Other: Room air

Interventions

  • OtherMaternal oxygen supplementation

    Maternal oxygen supplementation 10 liters/minute via nonrebreather mask

  • OtherRoom air

    Room air, no mask

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of neonates meeting criteria for composite neonatal morbidity

    One of the following diagnoses: Neonatal death, acidemia, meconium aspiration with pulmonary hypertension, hypoglycemia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy ,hypothermia treatment, seizure, respiratory distress

    Time frame: Up to 28 days of life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perentage of patients with operative delivery (cesarean or operative vaginal delivery)

    Time frame: At delivery

  2. Percentage of patients with operative delivery for the indication of nonreassuring fetal status

    Time frame: At delivery

  3. Percentage of neonates with neonatal death

    Time frame: 28 days of life

  4. Percentage of neonates with acidemia (pH<7.1)

    On delivery cord gas

    Time frame: At time of delivery

  5. Percentage of neonates with meconium aspiration with pulmonary hypertension

    Time frame: Within 72 hours of delivery

  6. Percentage of neonates with hypoglycemia

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of delivery

  7. Percentage of neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy

    Time frame: Within 72 hours of delivery

  8. Percentage of neonates with hypothermia treatment

    Time frame: Within 72 hours of delivery

  9. Percentage of neonates with seizure

    Time frame: 28 days of life

  10. Percentage of neonates with respiratory distress

    Time frame: Within 72 hours of delivery

  11. umbilical artery base excess

    Time frame: At delivery

  12. umbilical artery partial pressure oxygen

    Time frame: At delivery

  13. umbilical artery partial pressure carbon dioxide

    Time frame: At delivery

  14. Percentage of patients with composite maternal morbidity

    any diagnosis of the following: postpartum hemorrhage \[estimated blood loss \>1000 mL\]; severe perineal laceration, endometritis

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks of delivery

  15. Apgars at 5 and 10 minutes

    Time frame: At 5 and 10 minutes of neonatal life

  16. Apgar<5 at 5 and 10 mins

    Time frame: At 5 and 10 minutes of neonatal life

  17. Percentage of neonates with Neonatal Intensive care unit admission

    Time frame: Within 72 hours of delivery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The investigators will plan to share de-identified participant data and outcomes, study protocol, and analytic code via the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Upon publication of primary analysis and planned secondary analyses.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2028, 57 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2022
First posted
Jan 12, 2023
StartActual
May 22, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05681624
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), University of Michigan, University of Texas at Austin, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Brown University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 12, 2023
Start date
May 22, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Nandini Raghuraman, MD MSCI
Contact
nraghuraman@wustl.edu
3142732939

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion