ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07817329NUTUpdated Sep 14, 2026

NUT Project: Nutritional Support in Thoracic Oncology

An observational study in Oncologic Diseases and Lung Cancer (NSCLC), sponsored by Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

monitoring of the patient's nutritional status from diagnosis ensuring a dietetic-nutritional intervention throughout the treatment process

Read the detailed description

During the first visit, a nutritional screening test such as the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) will be performed, which represents one of the main internationally validated screening tools (recommended by ESPEN and SINPE) for the risk of malnutrition. The test considers both the nutritional status and the degree of severity of the underlying pathology.

The final score (Total Score) is the sum of three parameters:

  1. Nutritional Status: Assessed by percentage of weight loss, decline in dietary income, and BMI. (Score from 0 to 3).
  2. Severity of the Pathology: Evaluated according to the increased metabolic requirement linked to the disease (e.g. surgery, COPD, tumors, intensive care). (Score from 0 to 3).
  3. Age: For patients >70 years of age, a point is added.

Based on the final score:

  • patients with a score \< 3 (low nutritional risk) will receive simple nutritional advice from the oncologist on the correct management of their diet during treatment.
  • patients with score ≥ 3 (high nutritional risk) will be enrolled, after signing the informed consent, and subjected to a dietary - nutritional assessment as per clinical practice.

This nutritional dietary assessment is composed of:

  1. Use of GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition

    The patient will then be assessed according to the GLIM (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition) criteria, which are the international standard for the diagnosis and classification of malnutrition in adults. They are based on a two-stage process:

    Initial screening: Identifies the risk of malnutrition using validated tools (NRS2002 test) Diagnosis: Requires the presence of at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiological criterion.

    The Three Phenotypic Criteria serve to define the severity of malnutrition and are:

    • Unintentional weight loss: Quantified based on the percentage of weight lost over time.
    • Low Body Mass Index (BMI) based on age-specific thresholds.
    • Reduced muscle mass: Assessed by body composition tests (e.g. BIA or DXA) or anthropometric measurements.

    The Two Etiological Criteria serve to guide the therapeutic path and are:

    • Reduced food intake or absorption: Intake of a smaller amount than estimated nutritional needs.
    • Inflammation or presence of pathologies: acute, chronic conditions (e.g. tumors, inflammatory diseases) or trauma that increase catabolism Based on the extent of the phenotypic criteria, it is then possible to establish the severity (stage 1 or stage 2) of malnutrition.
  2. Nutrition data collections
  3. Completion of questionnaires for data collection on health-related quality of life and oncology fatigue data (EORTC -QLQ-C30; EQ-5D-5L; FACIT-F)

This nutritional dietary assessment will be performed, in addition to the diagnosis (Time 0,) also at the following times:

  • after 3-4 months i.e. at the first re-evaluation of restaging (time 1)
  • after 6-8 months i.e. at the second re-evaluation of restaging (time 2)
  • after 12 months i.e. at the third re-evaluation of restaging and one year after diagnosis (time 3) 3) These longitudinal reassessments will allow us to describe the impact of nutritional support on quality of life over time.

Between one evaluation and the next, patients with screening ≥ 3 taken into care, as per clinical practice, from a dietary-nutritional point of view, will receive a personalized intervention on a regular basis (approximately every 30-50 days) that can make use of counseling and/or diet therapy and/or nutritional support (use of Oral Nutritional Supplement, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition). The study therefore also aims to monitor the frequency and type of nutritional intervention performed (nutritional counseling and/or diet therapy and/or nutritional support) and their correlation with other variables collected as per clinical practice.

Following the enlistment phase (2 years), subjects will be observed for a total duration of 1 year at the end of which a second year is foreseen for the analysis and drafting of the results. Patients will be evaluated through a follow-up visit as per clinical practice, and those who have completed follow-up at the hospital will be contacted by telephone for a telematic data update.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oncologic Diseases
  • Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Keywords

  • nutritional support
  • diet
  • BMI
  • fatigue
  • adverse events
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 1,434 observational studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Diagnosis of advanced/metastatic non-small cell and small cell lung cancer

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women aged ≥ 18 years,
  • Diagnosis of advanced/ non-small cell and small cell lung cancer candidates for treatment of thoracic cancer
  • High nutritional risk according to NRS2002 screening test (score ≥3)
  • Nutritional assessment and care at the center
  • Sign

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of availability of information regarding anamnestic data,
  • Failure to sign
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Othernutritional status

    During the first visit, a nutritional screening test such as the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) will be performed, which represents one of the main internationally validated screening tools (recommended by ESPEN and SINPE) for the risk of malnutrition. The test considers both the nutritional status and the degree of severity of the underlying pathology. Based on the final score: * patients with a score \< 3 will receive simple nutritional advice from the oncologist on the correct management of their diet during treatment. * patients with score ≥ 3 will be enrolled, after signing the informed consent, and subjected to a dietary - nutritional assessment as per clinical practice. This nutritional dietary assessment is composed of: 1. Use of GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition 2. Nutrition data collections 3. Completion of questionnaires for data collection on health-related quality of life and data on oncological fatigue

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of weight (kg)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of height (cm)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of BMI (kg/m^2)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of fatigue (Units on a Scale)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of adverse events

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Describe the impact of dietary intervention and/or nutritional support on the nutritional status of patients during antiblastic treatments in terms of strength (Hand Grip)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07817329
Lead sponsor
Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Elisa Roca, MD
Contact
urc@ospedalepederzoli.it
+39 0456444193

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion