ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07813988Updated Sep 14, 2026

Comparing Three Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches for Lumbar Radicular Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of High-Volume Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection and Low-Volume Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, sponsored by Benha University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Benha University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare three fluoroscopy-guided epidural steroid injection approaches for adults with unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain caused by lumbar disc herniation. The study will evaluate whether the pattern of contrast spread in the epidural space predicts meaningful pain relief.

Ninety-nine participants will be randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive one of three treatments: high-volume parasagittal interlaminar injection, low-volume parasagittal interlaminar injection, or transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Participants will not be told which injection approach they receive. Pain and disability will be assessed before treatment and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after injection. The main outcome is the proportion of participants with clinically meaningful improvement in pain at 3 months.

Read the detailed description

Lumbar disc herniation may cause lumbosacral radicular pain through nerve-root compression and inflammation. Fluoroscopy-guided epidural steroid injections are commonly used when symptoms persist despite conservative treatment. Parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) approaches may produce different patterns of contrast distribution within the epidural space. It remains unclear whether contrast spread pattern independently predicts clinical response, apart from injection approach and injectate volume.

This prospective, three-arm randomized clinical trial will enroll adults with unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain and magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbar disc herniation. Participants will be allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to high-volume PIL injection (10 mL), low-volume PIL injection (7 mL), or TFESI (3 mL). Before administration of the therapeutic injectate, 2 mL of non-ionic iodinated contrast medium will be injected under real-time fluoroscopy to confirm epidural placement, exclude intravascular or intrathecal injection, and document contrast distribution.

Blinded assessors will classify contrast spread according to ventral epidural spread, laterality, foraminal or nerve-root spread, epidural distribution pattern, and cephalocaudal extent. Dynamic fluoroscopic assessment will measure time to first ventral opacification. Participants, radiographic assessors, and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation where feasible; the procedural physician cannot be blinded because of the procedural differences.

The study will assess whether contrast spread variables independently predict responder status at 3 months, defined as a reduction of at least 2 points or 30% from baseline in Numerical Rating Scale pain score. Additional outcomes include changes in pain intensity and Oswestry Disability Index scores, procedural efficiency, duration of pain relief, and responder status during follow-up through 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Disc Herniation
  • Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Keywords

  • Epidural Steroid Injection
  • Parasagittal Interlaminar Injection
  • Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
  • Radicular Pain
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Oswestry Disability Index
  • Numerical Rating Scale
  • Contrast Spread
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

474 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement; 100 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 99 is above the median of 63 across 344 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Displacement studies →

Lead sponsor

Benha University is the lead sponsor of 362 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • Unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain consistent with a dermatomal distribution.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbar disc herniation (bulge, protrusion, or extrusion) at the corresponding clinical level.
  • Persistent symptoms despite at least 6 weeks of conservative management, including analgesics and physiotherapy.
  • Baseline Numerical Rating Scale pain score of 4 or greater.
  • physical status I to III.
  • Ability to understand and complete outcome assessments.
  • Written provided.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous lumbar spine surgery or failed back surgery syndrome.
  • Red-flag signs, including foot drop, urinary incontinence, or cauda equina syndrome.
  • Bilateral radicular symptoms or central canal stenosis requiring surgical intervention.
  • Coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant therapy.
  • Local or systemic infection or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Known allergy to contrast medium, local anesthetics, or .
  • Pregnancy.
  • Severe renal impairment contraindicating contrast use.
  • Chronic opioid use, defined as daily opioid use for more than 3 months before enrollment.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease, including unstable diabetes or severe cardiopulmonary disease.
  • Inability to comply with follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
99 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-Volume PIL

    Participants receive a fluoroscopy-guided parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection with 10 mL therapeutic injectate: betamethasone 24 mg and bupivacaine 0.5% 20 mg.

    Procedure: High-Volume Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection · Drug: Betamethasone Dipropionate / Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate · Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Experimental
    Low-Volume PIL

    PILParticipants receive a fluoroscopy-guided parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection with 7 mL therapeutic injectate: betamethasone 16.8 mg and bupivacaine 0.5% 14 mg.

    Procedure: Low-Volume Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection · Drug: Betamethasone Dipropionate / Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate · Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Experimental
    TFESI

    participants receive a fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection with 3 mL therapeutic injectate: betamethasone 7.2 mg and bupivacaine 0.5% 6 mg.

    Procedure: Transforaminal epidural steroid injection · Drug: Betamethasone Dipropionate / Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate · Drug: Bupivacaine

Interventions

  • ProcedureHigh-Volume Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection

    Fluoroscopy-guided parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection on the symptomatic side. After a standardized 2 mL non-ionic iodinated contrast injection, 10 mL therapeutic injectate is administered: betamethasone 24 mg and bupivacaine 0.5% 20 mg.

    Also known as: High-Volume PIL

  • ProcedureLow-Volume Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection

    Fluoroscopy-guided parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection on the symptomatic side. After a standardized 2 mL non-ionic iodinated contrast injection, 7 mL therapeutic injectate is administered: betamethasone 16.8 mg and bupivacaine 0.5% 14 mg.

    Also known as: Low-Volume PIL

  • ProcedureTransforaminal epidural steroid injection

    Fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection at the symptomatic level and side. After a standardized 2 mL non-ionic iodinated contrast injection, 3 mL therapeutic injectate is administered: betamethasone 7.2 mg and bupivacaine 0.5% 6 mg.

    Also known as: TFESI

  • DrugBetamethasone Dipropionate / Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate

    Drug pages: Betamethasone dipropionate · Betamethasone sodium phosphate

    Administered in volume-proportional doses: 24 mg in High-Volume PIL, 16.8 mg in Low-Volume PIL, and 7.2 mg in TFESI.

  • Bupivacaine 0.5% is administered in volume-proportional doses: 20 mg in High-Volume PIL, 14 mg in Low-Volume PIL, and 6 mg in TFESI.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Pain Response

    Responder status is defined as a reduction from baseline of at least 2 points or at least 30% in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. The association between contrast-spread variables and responder status will be assessed.

    Time frame: 3 months after injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Score

    Mean change from baseline in pain intensity measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Change in NRS pain score will be calculated as the score at each follow-up time point minus the baseline score. Units of measure: i'd use points on a scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after injection.

  2. Change in Oswestry Disability Index Score

    Change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index score; scores are expressed from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

    Time frame: Baseline; 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after injection

  3. Total fluoroscopy time

    Total duration of fluoroscopy exposure during the index injection procedure. Measured in seconds.

    Time frame: During the index injection procedure

  4. number of fluoroscopic images

    Total number of fluoroscopic images acquired during the index injection procedure. Measured by number of images.

    Time frame: During the index injection procedure

  5. procedure duration

    Total duration of the index injection procedure, measured from the start of the procedure until completion of the injection. Measured in minutes.

    Time frame: During the index injection procedure

  6. Duration of Pain Relief

    Time from index injection to loss of benefit, defined as return to less than 30% NRS reduction from baseline or participant request for repeat intervention or surgical referral.

    Time frame: From injection through 6 months after injection

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because no data-sharing plan has been established. This approach protects participant privacy and is consistent with institutional ethics and data-protection requirements.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 13 months later.

Of 14 phase 4 interventional studies under Intervertebral Disc Displacement, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 101. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2026
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2028
Last update
Sep 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07813988
Lead sponsor
Benha University
Responsible party
Samar Rafik Mohamed Amin (assistant professor of anesthesia and intensive care, Benha University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

anas fetian, M.B.B.Ch., M.Sc.
Contact
a.ftyan48177@fmed.bu.edu.eg
+20 1275089656

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion