ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07810582Updated Sep 9, 2026

Transurethral Versus Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy for Bladder Stones in Adults

An interventional study of Transurethral Cystolithotripsy and Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy in Urinary Bladder Calculi, Bladder Calculi and Urolithiasis, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates and compares two minimally invasive surgical approaches for treating bladder stones in adult patients: transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL).

Urinary bladder stones are commonly managed using endoscopic techniques to avoid the morbidity of open surgery. TUCL accesses the bladder through the natural urinary channel (urethra), whereas PCCL accesses the bladder directly through a small puncture in the lower abdomen above the pubic bone. While both approaches are effective, comparative data in adult populations remain limited.

Eligible participants are randomly assigned to receive either TUCL or PCCL. The primary goal is to compare stone clearance rates and operative times between the two procedures. Secondary objectives include comparing surgical complication rates, duration of postoperative urinary catheterization, and length of hospital stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Bladder Calculi
  • Bladder Calculi
  • Urolithiasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transurethral Cystolithotripsy
  • Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy
  • TUCL
  • PCCL
  • Lithotripsy
  • Bladder Stones
03

In context

Urolithiasis

253 studies on the registry are indexed under Urolithiasis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 182 interventional studies indexed under Urolithiasis.

Browse Urolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with single or multiple urinary bladder stones
  • Stone diameter between 1 and 4 cm at its largest diameter or cumulative stone diameter
  • Candidates for both transurethral and percutaneous endoscopic treatment modalities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Known urethral stricture or significant urethral pathology precluding safe transurethral instrumentation
  • History of bladder augmentation, major lower abdominal surgery, or pelvic radiotherapy
  • Concomitant bladder tumor or suspected bladder neoplasm
  • Stone located within a bladder diverticulum or within a contracted bladder
  • Requiring concomitant urological procedures during the same operative session (e.g., transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP] or lower ureteric stone extraction)
  • Urethral stones pushed back into the bladder
  • Refusal to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: Transurethral Cystolithotripsy (TUCL)

    Participants undergo transurethral cystolithotripsy under spinal or general anesthesia. A rigid cystoscope is introduced through the urethra under direct vision. Bladder calculi are visualized and fragmented using a Mauermayer stone punch and/or pneumatic lithotripter via a semirigid ureteroscope. Stone fragments are evacuated using an Ellik evacuator and/or grasping forceps. Stone clearance and mucosal integrity are confirmed by cystoscopy, followed by insertion of a two-way urethral Foley catheter.

    Procedure: Transurethral Cystolithotripsy

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy (PCCL)

    Participants undergo percutaneous cystolithotripsy under spinal or general anesthesia. The bladder is filled retrogradely with 300-400 cc of sterile irrigation fluid via cystoscopy. Under ultrasound and cystoscopic guidance, a midline suprapubic puncture is performed with an 18G needle, followed by guidewire insertion, fascial dilation, and placement of a 30 F Amplatz sheath. Stones are fragmented with a pneumatic lithotripter via a 26 F nephroscope and extracted with grasping forceps. Postoperative drainage includes a urethral Foley catheter (with or without a suprapubic catheter).

    Procedure: Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransurethral Cystolithotripsy

    Under spinal or general anesthesia, a rigid cystoscope is introduced transurethrally under direct vision. Bladder calculi are visualized and fragmented using a Mauermayer stone punch and/or pneumatic lithotripter via a semirigid ureteroscope according to stone size and consistency. Stone fragments are evacuated using an Ellik evacuator and/or grasping forceps. Complete clearance and mucosal integrity are confirmed by cystoscopy, followed by insertion of a two-way urethral Foley catheter.

  • ProcedurePercutaneous Cystolithotripsy

    Under spinal or general anesthesia, the bladder is distended retrogradely with 300-400 cc sterile irrigation fluid via cystoscopy. Under combined ultrasound and cystoscopic guidance, a midline suprapubic percutaneous puncture is executed using an 18G needle, followed by guidewire placement, tract dilation, and insertion of a 30 F Amplatz working sheath. A 26 F rigid nephroscope is introduced, and calculi are fragmented using a pneumatic lithotripter and removed with grasping forceps. A urethral Foley catheter is placed postoperatively, with or without a suprapubic tube based on intraoperative findings.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stone-Free Rate

    Stone-free status is defined as complete stone clearance or presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) \<= 2 mm confirmed by direct endoscopic inspection.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07810582
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mohamed Sayed Ahmed Aboliela (Resident of Urology, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion