ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07810439PROTECT-AfricaUpdated Sep 9, 2026

PROTECT-Africa: Biomarker Validation for Preeclampsia Triage

An observational study in Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, HELLP Syndrome and Eclampsia, sponsored by Africa Clinical Research Network (ACRN). Recruiting at 1 site in Zimbabwe. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Africa Clinical Research Network (ACRN) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,106
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Preeclampsia is a serious high blood pressure condition that can develop during pregnancy. It is one of the leading causes of death and illness for mothers and babies in Africa. Doctors find it hard to tell which women with high blood pressure in pregnancy will go on to become seriously ill, because the tests available today are not accurate enough and are often not available in local clinics.

Two proteins in the blood, called sFlt-1 and PlGF, may help predict who is at risk. The balance between them (the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) has been useful in other parts of the world, but it has not been properly tested in African women. New rapid tests can measure these proteins at the clinic in minutes, using a small blood or urine sample, without a large laboratory.

This study will look at how well these tests work in African women. Researchers will do two things. First, they will work out the result levels that best predict whether a woman will or will not develop severe preeclampsia in the following weeks, using a well-established laboratory test as the standard for comparison. Second, they will check how closely the rapid clinic tests match that laboratory standard. The study will also look at what these tests cost and whether using them could save money for families and health services.

The study will include about 1,106 pregnant women at large maternity hospitals in Zimbabwe, Rwanda and Tanzania. Women may join if they are between 23 and 37 weeks pregnant with one baby and their care team suspects preeclampsia, for example because of raised blood pressure, protein in the urine, or symptoms such as headache, swelling or vision changes.

Taking part does not change a woman's medical care in any way. Women will attend their usual pregnancy visits, plus study visits at 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks, at delivery, and about 4 weeks after birth. At these visits the study team will record health information and collect blood and urine samples. About 15 ml of blood (around one tablespoon) is collected at each visit.

The test results are not used to make any decisions about a woman's treatment. Doctors and nurses caring for her will not see them, and neither will she. All treatment decisions stay with her own healthcare team. Routine tests such as blood counts and liver tests are shared with her care team as usual.

The results of this study may help clinics in Africa spot dangerous preeclampsia earlier, so mothers and babies can be treated in time.

Read the detailed description

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy account for approximately 16 to 22 percent of maternal deaths in Africa, and the incidence of preeclampsia is estimated to be several times higher in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income settings. Angiogenic biomarkers, particularly the ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF), have demonstrated strong negative predictive value for short-term progression to preeclampsia in European and Asian cohorts, where a ratio cut-off of 38 has been validated. These cohorts did not include African populations. Differences in baseline angiogenic profiles and in the prevalence of comorbidities such as anaemia and infection may affect biomarker performance, so population-specific thresholds are required before these tools can be relied upon locally.

The study is organised in two parts using a single enrolled population. Part A establishes and then confirms sFlt-1/PlGF ratio thresholds on the Roche Elecsys reference platform, using a derivation cohort of 553 participants followed by an independent validation cohort of 553 participants. Part B evaluates rapid point-of-care platforms against those confirmed reference thresholds in the same 1,106 participants. The platforms under evaluation include quantitative serum or plasma immunoassays and a qualitative urine-based test that detects misfolded proteins. Stored samples may be used for additional platforms as they become commercially available.

Blinding is maintained at all sites: neither participants nor investigators receive biomarker results. Serum samples are batch-processed after collection, and urine tests requiring immediate analysis are performed without results being released to clinical teams. Because the reference and investigational results cannot influence management, the diagnostic accuracy estimates reflect the natural course of disease under routine care. Routine safety laboratory results, including full blood count and liver function tests, are returned to treating clinicians, since these are inconsistently available at the participating sites and support standard care.

Participants are grouped for analysis by the timing of diagnosis relative to the baseline visit: within one week, more than one week to four weeks, and beyond four weeks through two weeks postpartum. Those who develop none of the study conditions through four weeks postpartum form the comparator group. A within-trial economic evaluation runs alongside the clinical analysis. It uses a decision-analytic model from a societal perspective, capturing both health system and household costs, with short-term and five-year time horizons. Cost and volume data are collected from between three and seven purposively sampled health workers at participating facilities, who are not part of the trial population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
  • HELLP Syndrome
  • Eclampsia
  • Fetal Growth Retardation
  • Pre-eclampsia

Keywords

  • Roche Elecsys
  • cost-effectiveness
  • maternal health
  • sub-Saharan Africa
  • Africa
  • biomarker validation
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • point-of-care testing
  • angiogenic biomarkers
  • sFlt-1/PlGF ratio
  • PlGF
  • sFlt-1
03

In context

Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced

262 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,106 is above the median of 200 across 79 observational studies indexed under Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced.

Browse Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Africa Clinical Research Network (ACRN) as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women presenting with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at high-volume maternity referral centres in Zimbabwe, Rwanda and Tanzania. Participants are enrolled between 23 weeks 0 days and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation and span a spectrum of severity, including gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, suspected preeclampsia and superimposed preeclampsia. Participants who do not develop preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome or intrauterine growth restriction through four weeks postpartum serve as the comparator group for evaluating point-of-care test performance. Recruitment is consecutive from routine antenatal and maternity care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gestational age between 23 weeks 0 days and 36 weeks 6 days, established by ultrasound performed at 22 weeks of gestation or earlier Singleton pregnancy Suspicion of a clinical diagnosis of preeclampsia based on one or more of the following: new onset of elevated blood pressure (systolic ≥130 mmHg or diastolic ≥80 mmHg); aggravation of pre-existing hypertension; new onset of protein in urine; aggravation of pre-existing proteinuria; or one or more other reasons for clinical suspicion of preeclampsia Other reasons for clinical suspicion include preeclampsia-related symptoms (epigastric pain, excessive oedema or severe swelling of the face, hands or feet, headache, visual disturbances, or sudden weight gain greater than 1 kg per week in the third trimester) or preeclampsia-related findings (low , elevated liver transaminases, suspected intrauterine growth restriction, or abnormal uterine perfusion on Doppler sonography with mean pulsatility index above the 95th percentile in the second trimester and/or bilateral uterine artery notching, where available) Not currently enrolled in any other study or receiving an medicinal product Able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pregnancy (for example twins or triplets) Proteinuria 2+ or greater on dipstick AND elevated blood pressure (systolic ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥90 mmHg, reproducible on two occasions) Proteinuria 2+ or greater on dipstick and current antihypertensive treatment Confirmed diagnosis of HELLP syndrome No verified or documented ultrasound scan performed prior to 22 weeks of gestation to establish gestational age
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,106 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Optimal sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cut-off values for predicting preeclampsia with severe features (derivation cohort)

    Cut-off values for the Roche Elecsys sFlt-1/PlGF ratio that optimally predict the risk of preeclampsia with severe features in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to maximise positive and negative predictive value. Low ratios are assessed for prediction of the absence of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP syndrome within 1 and 2 weeks after Visit 1; high ratios are assessed for prediction of onset within 2 and 4 weeks after Visit 1.

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks after Visit 1

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mutala Trust
    Harare, Harare 263, Zimbabwe
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 49 observational studies under Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 119. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartActual
Feb 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07810439
Lead sponsor
Africa Clinical Research Network (ACRN)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Feb 5, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Tariro Makadzange
Contact
tariro.makadzange@acrnhealth.com
+18572008374

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion