An interventional study of LuCA Behavioral Intervention in Lung Cancer, sponsored by Duke University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.
Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The purpose of this study is to develop a brief assessment and need-based behavioral intervention for addressing aging-specific concerns in older adults with lung cancer. The long-term goals of this research include identifying the unique concerns of these patients, providing patients with behavioral skills to address their symptom management needs, and enhancing patient engagement with healthcare specialties targeting aging-specific concerns.
In the first phase of this study, participants (12 patients with lung cancer, 6 caregivers, 12 providers) will be asked to participate in two individual interviews (each 30-45 minutes in length) via teleconference. During the first interview, participants will be asked to provide feedback on the current version of the assessment and behavioral intervention. Participants will be asked to describe strengths and weaknesses of the materials, topics to add or remove, and any other suggested changes. After the research team has made changes to the materials, participants will be invited to complete a second interview to provide feedback on the updated materials.
In the second phase of the study, 16 older adults with lung cancer will complete the revised assessment and participate in the behavioral intervention, in order to a) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the program and b) measure change in depression, anxiety, pain, and dyspnea.
** Phase I of the study was previously factored into the record via the overall status and start date, but the record has been revised as of 08-2026 and is now only a reflection of Phase II.
Aim 1. The investigators will first develop a brief geriatric assessment, designed to address the specific needs of older adults with lung cancer. As a foundation, the investigators will collect existing, empirically supported geriatric assessment tools, such as the Senior Adult Oncology Program (SAOP) assessment and the Geriatric 8 (G8), and the Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST). The investigators will combine these tools such that all relevant domains are included in the aggregated assessment. The study team will then collaboratively add further items into the assessment (as related to difficulties commonly faced by older adults with lung cancer) and remove excess or irrelevant items.
The study team will then develop the initial prototype of a need-based behavioral intervention protocol to address aging-specific concerns and multimorbidity in older adults with lung cancer. The behavioral intervention will build upon and extend a previously tested intervention, which demonstrated benefits for reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms in older adults with lung cancer. The intervention will be a 5-session protocol, to be delivered to patients in an individual therapy setting, via telehealth or in-person. The program will integrate aspects of cognitive behavioral therapy (identifying and challenging automatic thoughts, engaging in behavioral activation) and acceptance and commitment therapy (integrating one's values, distancing skills). The intervention will include skills such as problem-solving, communicating with close others and the medical team, and breathing techniques to improve shortness of breath related to lung cancer.
Aim 2. The investigators will then conduct interviews with lung cancer patients (N=12), provider stakeholders (N=12), and caregivers (N=6) in order to obtain feedback on the proposed assessment and intervention. Caregiver participants will be either a) caregivers for lung cancer patients participating in interviews for this study, or b) caregivers for other patients with lung cancer. Each interview will be 30-45 minutes in length.
All patient, caregiver, and provider interview sessions will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. During interview sessions, the participant will be provided with the current version of the geriatric assessment and behavioral intervention. A semi-structured interview script will be utilized to obtain feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of the materials, thoughts on topics to add or remove, and amendments to any wording or structural details. Data from the initial interviews will allow the investigators to refine the assessment, referral resources, and intervention content so that it best meets the needs of this patient population.
All patients, caregivers, and provider stakeholders will be invited to complete a second interview to provide feedback on the revised materials. Thus, participants will be recruited to participate in 2 interviews - one for the initial set of materials, and one for the revised set. Because all participation is voluntary, participants can choose to opt out of any portion. If the investigators are unable to obtain adequate response rates for the second interview, they will recruit new participants meeting eligibility criteria to complete interviews surrounding the revised material.
Aim 3. The investigators will then conduct a preliminary study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the revised geriatric assessment and behavioral intervention protocol. N=16 older adults with lung cancer will be recruited to complete the geriatric assessment and 5-session intervention. The assessment will be completed on paper in the clinic or digitally via RedCap survey sent via email, based on participant preference. The intervention sessions will be conducted via telehealth. Sessions will occur once per week for 5 weeks, and will last approximately one hour each. Sessions will be video-recorded and transcribed verbatim.
**Aim 1 and 2 were previously factored into the record via the overall status and start date, but the record has been revised as of 08-2026 and is now only a reflection of the intervention component in aim 3.
5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 16 is below the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.
Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants will engage in a 5-session protocol, to be delivered in an individual therapy setting, via telehealth or in-person. The program will integrate aspects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
Behavioral: LuCA Behavioral Intervention
The intervention will integrate aspects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (identifying and challenging automatic thoughts, engaging in behavioral activation) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (integrating one's values, distancing skills). The intervention will include skills such as problem-solving, communicating with close others and the medical team, and breathing techniques to improve shortness of breath related to lung cancer.
Feasibility as measured by number of recruited participants who enrolled
Study feasibility will be measured by number of recruited participants who enroll.
Time frame: 5 weeks
Feasibility as measured by number of participants who completed all study activities
Feasibility of the study will be measured by number of participants who complete all study activities.
Time frame: 5 weeks
Acceptability as measured by Study Satisfaction Questionnaire
Acceptability of the study will be measured by the Study Satisfaction Questionnaire. This is a 15-item measure using a 5-point Likert scale (from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree") in which a higher score indicates greater satisfaction.
Time frame: 5 weeks
Change in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total score ranges from 0 to 27 (scores of 5-9 are classified as mild depression; 10-14 as moderate depression; 15-19 as moderately severe depression; ≥ 20 as severe depression).
Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks
Change in anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score ranges from 0 to 21, where a higher score indicates greater anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks
Change in physical pain as measured by the Brief Pain Questionnaire (BPI)
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a tool that uses a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, where a higher score indicates greater pain.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks
Change in dyspnea as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ)
The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire is scored on a 7-point scale, with 1 indicating maximum impairment and 7 indicating no impairment. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks
Plan to share: No — It is the investigators' intention to make all data generated from this study freely available after it is de-identified. All direct respondent identifiers (e.g., names and addresses) will be removed and maintained in a secure file for future contact purposes. Respondent identifiers will not be shared. All other scientific data (scale composites) will be both preserved and shared. The following data will be preserved and shared: patient-reported data from study assessments, assessment and intervention utilization data, healthcare utilization data collected from the health record, and socio-demographic and medical data collected via patient report and health record. The investigators will make every effort to provide raw data in a non-proprietary format wherever possible to enhance reproducibility.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.