ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07799311Updated Sep 2, 2026

Comparing the Efficacy of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine in Prevention of Emergence Agitation After Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children

A Phase 4 interventional study of propofol 1mg/kg and Dexmedetomidine in Emergence Delirium, Anesthesia, sponsored by Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a clinical study for comparing the efficacy of two drugs i.e propofol and dexmedetomidine in prevention of a group of post operative abnormal behaviours that can occur after sevoflurane anesthesia in children and we will measure this by a special scale which is used to evaluate these behavioural changes.

Read the detailed description

A randomized clinical trial in which we will compare a single dose propofol with a single dose of dexmedetomodine given at the end of surgery after sevoflurane _based anesthesia to prevent post operative emergence agitation which is a group of behaviours consisting of confusion , disorientation,hyperactivity and even physical harm to themselves and others. this behavioural response is assessed by a score which is called peadriatric anesthesia emergence delerium scale (PEAD) which consist of 5-itms and 5-point scale ,ranging from not at all to extremely.the total score range from 0 to 20,with higher scores indicating more svere emergence agitation . In this study , the PEAD score will be recorded at 0,5,10,15,and 30 minutes after the child reach the recovery room ,and score greater than 10 at any of these readings will be taken as emergence agitation or delerium.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emergence Delirium, Anesthesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Emergence Delirium

751 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergence Delirium; 262 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 114 is close to the median of 120 across 464 interventional studies indexed under Emergence Delirium.

Browse Emergence Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

1- age 2-12 years 2-elective inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia

-

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. congenital anomalies
  2. allergic to study medications
  3. chronic pain syndromes
  4. malnourishment -
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
114 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group propofol

    Drug: propofol 1mg/kg

  • Active comparator
    group dexmedetomidine

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • Drugpropofol 1mg/kg

    Drug page: Propofol

    1mg/kg propofol given 10 minutes before the end of surgery

  • 0.3mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine to group D patients will be given after dilution with 10ml of 0.9%saline over 1 min given 10 minutes before extubation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Emergence Delirium PAED score

    Time frame: PAED score will be calculated upon arrival in Post Anesthesia care unit then at 5,10,15,30 minutes interval

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ghada F. Amer & Maha Younis Abdallah (2022) Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric cataract surgery: Double blinded randomized study, Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, 38:1, 300-304, DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2022.2077049

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Ethical committe doesnt allow

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07799311
Lead sponsor
Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Muhammad Haroon Anwar (Principal investigator, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 2, 2026
Start date
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 28, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Study contacts

Muhammad Haroon Principal Investigator, MBBS, FCPS
Contact
haroonanwar22@gmail.com
+92-333-5236956
Naheed Fatima
study chair · Head of Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Propofol · Dexmedetomidine

Start the discussion