ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07783295ORIONUpdated Aug 26, 2026

Full-Spectrum Cannabis Extract for Chronic Pain and Bone Health Biomarkers in Women

A Phase 2 interventional study of Full-Spectrum Cannabis Extract 5:1 (CBD:THC) in Chronic Pain, Fibromyalgia and Osteoporosis, sponsored by Associação Pan-Americana Multidisciplinar de Endocanabinologia. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Associação Pan-Americana Multidisciplinar de Endocanabinologia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Chronic pain disproportionately affects women and may coexist with impaired bone health, particularly during midlife and after menopause. The endocannabinoid system is involved in pain modulation and bone homeostasis; however, clinical studies that integrate pain outcomes, bone-related biomarkers, genetic variants, and salivary endocannabinoids remain limited.This randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled crossover trial will evaluate the effects of a full-spectrum medicinal cannabis extract with a cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol ratio of 5:1 on chronic pain in women aged 45 to 80 years with chronic pain refractory to conventional treatment. Eighty participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences: full-spectrum cannabis extract followed by matching placebo, or matching placebo followed by full-spectrum cannabis extract. The treatment periods, washout interval, and visit schedule will follow the final approved protocol.The primary outcome is change in chronic pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, sleep quality, functional impact, bone health biomarkers, bone mineral density measured by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry, salivary endocannabinoids, the association of CB and TRPV genetic variants with treatment response, and adverse events. The study aims to generate evidence on the clinical effects and biological correlates of medicinal cannabis therapy in women with chronic pain.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial conducted in women aged 45 to 80 years with moderate to severe chronic pain that has persisted for at least 3 months and has not responded adequately to conventional pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments. Participants will be randomlyallocated in permuted blocks to one of two treatments sequences. Sequence A will receive a full-spectrum medicinal cannabis extract with a cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol ratio of 5:1 during the first treatment period, followed by a protocol-defined washout interval and matching placebo during the second treatment period. Sequence B will receive matching placebo during the first treatment period, followed by the washout interval and the full-spectrum medicinal cannabis extract during the second treatment period. The study product will be administered orally as softgel capsules. The target daily dose is 25 milligrams of cannabidiol and 5 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol. Dose titration during the first 2 weeks of each active treatment period will follow the final approved protocol.Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors will remain masked to treatment assignment as operationally applicable. Randomization will use a computer-generated sequence with permuted blocks of 4 and allocation concealment through opaque, sealed envelopes. The product and matching placebo will be supplied in indistinguishable presentations.Clinical evaluations will include pain intensity, quality of life, functional impact, sleep quality, concomitant medications, adherence, and adverse events. Laboratory assessments will include safety tests, selected bone metabolism biomarkers, inflammatory markers, and oxidative stress biomarkers. Bone mineral density and body composition will be assessed using dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry at protocol-defined baseline and final visits. Genetic analysis will evaluate CB and TRPV variants. Salivary anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, palmitoylethanolamide, and oleoylethanolamide will be quantified using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry according to the final sample collection schedule.The primary efficacy analysis will compare pain outcomes across cannabis and placebo treatment periods while accounting for the crossover design. Secondary analyses will evaluate changes in patient-reported outcomes and biomarkers, treatment safety, and associations between genetic variants or salivary endocannabinoid profiles and treatment response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Osteoporosis
  • Orofacial Pain

Keywords

  • medical cannabis
  • cannabidiol
  • tetrahydrocannabinol
  • bone turnover
  • CB1 receptor
  • CB2 receptor
  • TRPV1 receptor
  • Women
  • crossover trial
  • bone mineral density
  • chronic pain
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Associação Pan-Americana Multidisciplinar de Endocanabinologia is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex, age 45 to 80 years
  • Moderate to severe chronic pain, defined as a pain score of at least 4 on a 0 to 10 Visual Analog Scale, persisting for more than 3 months
  • Documented inadequate response to at least 2 classes of analgesic treatments or non-pharmacological treatments
  • Willingness to abstain from smoked cannabis and non-study cannabinoid products during the study
  • Ability to understand the form and study questionnaires
  • Willingness and ability to attend scheduled visits and biological sample collections during the study follow-up period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment that precludes understanding of the form or study questionnaires
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric condition, including uncontrolled psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant during the study
  • Current use of medicinal cannabis, smoked cannabis, or other cannabinoid products
  • Known to cannabinoids or formulation
  • hepatic impairment, defined as or alanine aminotransferase greater than 3 times the , or severe heart failure classified as class III or IV
  • History of substance use disorder that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with study participation
  • Use of medications that may interfere with bone metabolism, including bisphosphonates, systemic , or sex hormones, within 6 months before enrollment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cannabis Extract Then Placebo

    Participants receive oral full-spectrum cannabis extract with a cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol ratio of 5:1 during Treatment Period 1, followed by the protocol-defined washout interval and matching placebo during Treatment Period 2.

    Drug: Full-Spectrum Cannabis Extract 5:1 (CBD:THC)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Then Cannabis Extract

    Participants receive matching placebo during Treatment Period 1, followed by the protocol-defined washout interval and oral full-spectrum cannabis extract with a cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol ratio of 5:1 during Treatment Period 2.

    Drug: Full-Spectrum Cannabis Extract 5:1 (CBD:THC)

Interventions

  • Oral softgel capsule containing full-spectrum medicinal cannabis extract with a cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol ratio of 5:1. The target daily dose is 25 milligrams of cannabidiol and 5 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol. Participants will receive the study product once daily in the evening, with gradual dose titration during the first 2 weeks of each active treatment period, according to the final approved protocol. The product will be administered for the duration of each protocol-defined active treatment period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Period Baseline in Chronic Pain Intensity on the Visual Analog Scale

    Chronic pain intensity will be measured using a 0 to 10 Visual Analog Scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The baseline score will be the mean pain intensity reported over the preceding 7 days. A clinical response is defined as a reduction of at least 30 percent from the baseline score of the corresponding treatment period.

    Time frame: At the baseline and end of each treatment period, approximately 6 months per period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Period Baseline in Sleep Quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

    Sleep quality will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a self-reported instrument with a global score from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: At baseline and at 3 and 6 Months each treatment period.

  2. Change From Period Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life on the 36-Item Short Form Survey.

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Scores are calculated for 8 domains from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: At baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of each treatment period.

  3. Change From Period Baseline in Pain-Related Quality of Life on the WHOQOL-Pain Instrument.

    Pain-related quality of life will be assessed using the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-Pain instrument. Scoring and interpretation will follow the validated instrument manual.

    Time frame: At baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of each treatment period.

  4. Change From Period Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Score Among Participants With Fibromyalgia.

    Functional impact among participants with a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia will be assessed using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). The scale will be scored according to the validated Portuguese version; higher scores indicate greater disease impact.

    Time frame: At baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of each treatment period.

  5. Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

    Bone mineral density and body composition will be assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone mineral density will be reported in grams per square centimeter and interpreted using T-scores according to applicable clinical criteria.

    Time frame: At baseline and at the final study visit, approximately 12 months after enrollment.

  6. Change From Period Baseline in Serum Bone Turnover Biomarkers.

    Serum bone health biomarkers will include the final protocol-specified panel of alkaline phosphatase, total and ionized calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and parathyroid hormone. If procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide and C-terminal telopeptide are retained in the final protocol, they should be listed here explicitly.

    Time frame: At baseline and at protocol-defined follow-up visits through final study completion, approximately 12 months.

  7. Association of CB2 and TRPV1 Genetic Variants With Pain Treatment Response.

    Genotyping of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2/CNR2) and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) variants will be performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Associations between genotype or haplotype and the prespecified Visual Analog Scale pain response will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Genotyping at baseline; association with pain response through the end of each treatment period, approximately 12 months.

  8. Change From Baseline in Salivary Endocannabinoid Concentrations.

    Salivary concentrations of anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, palmitoylethanolamide, and oleoylethanolamide will be quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and reported in nanograms per milliliter.

    Time frame: Use the final collection schedule; do not submit this entry until the protocol is harmonized as baseline-only or serial sampling.

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events.

    Adverse events will be collected through clinical visits and weekly remote pharmacotherapeutic monitoring. Events will be classified by severity, seriousness, relatedness to study treatment, and treatment period.

    Time frame: From first study product administration through the end of each treatment period, approximately 6 months per period.

  10. Change From Period Baseline in Hepatic and Renal Safety Laboratory Values.

    Safety laboratory assessments will include protocol-specified hepatic and renal tests, including aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, urea, and creatinine. Results will be reported in standard laboratory units.

    Time frame: At baseline and at protocol-defined follow-up visits through final study completion, approximately 12 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Projeto Shalom
    São Paulo, São Paulo 09130-040, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Andreis K, Billingsley J, Naimi Shirazi K, Wager-Miller J, Johnson C, Bradshaw H, Straiker A. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors regulate salivation. Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 19;12(1):14182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17987-2. PubMed 35986066 ↗
  • de Melo Reis RA, Isaac AR, Freitas HR, de Almeida MM, Schuck PF, Ferreira GC, Andrade-da-Costa BLDS, Trevenzoli IH. Quality of Life and a Surveillant Endocannabinoid System. Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 28;15:747229. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.747229. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34776851 ↗
  • Cupini LM, Bari M, Battista N, Argiro G, Finazzi-Agro A, Calabresi P, Maccarrone M. Biochemical changes in endocannabinoid system are expressed in platelets of female but not male migraineurs. Cephalalgia. 2006 Mar;26(3):277-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01031.x. PubMed 16472333 ↗
  • Russo EB. Clinical Endocannabinoid Deficiency Reconsidered: Current Research Supports the Theory in Migraine, Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel, and Other Treatment-Resistant Syndromes. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2016 Jul 1;1(1):154-165. doi: 10.1089/can.2016.0009. eCollection 2016. PubMed 28861491 ↗
  • Russo EB. Clinical endocannabinoid deficiency (CECD): can this concept explain therapeutic benefits of cannabis in migraine, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome and other treatment-resistant conditions? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2008 Apr;29(2):192-200. PubMed 18404144 ↗
  • Russo EB. Clinical endocannabinoid deficiency (CECD): can this concept explain therapeutic benefits of cannabis in migraine, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome and other treatment-resistant conditions? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Feb-Apr;25(1-2):31-9. PubMed 15159679 ↗
  • Zimmer A. A collaboration investigating endocannabinoid signalling in brain and bone. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 May 1;27(3):229-35. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0125. PubMed 26887036 ↗
  • Macedo CG, Fanton LE, Fischer L, Tambeli CH. Coactivation of mu- and kappa-Opioid Receptors May Mediate the Protective Effect of Testosterone on the Development of Temporomandibular Joint Nociception in Male Rats. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2016 Winter;30(1):61-7. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1298. PubMed 26817034 ↗
  • Leucuta DC, Anton D, Almasan O. Estrogen Hormones' Implications on the Physiopathology of Temporomandibular Dysfunction. J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 27;13(15):4406. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154406. PubMed 39124673 ↗
  • Fischer L, Torres-Chavez KE, Clemente-Napimoga JT, Jorge D, Arsati F, de Arruda Veiga MC, Tambeli CH. The influence of sex and ovarian hormones on temporomandibular joint nociception in rats. J Pain. 2008 Jul;9(7):630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.02.006. PubMed 18420460 ↗
  • Ferraris C, Scarlett CJ, Veysey M, Lucock M, Bucher T, Beckett EL. Salt-Taste Polymorphism TRPV1-rs8065080 Is Associated with Increased Likelihood of Depression in an Elderly Cohort. Lifestyle Genom. 2023;16(1):224-236. doi: 10.1159/000534521. Epub 2023 Oct 26. PubMed 37883944 ↗
  • Giacon M, Cargnin S, Allena M, Greco R, Zanaboni AM, Facchetti S, De Icco R, Sances G, Ghiotto N, Guaschino E, Martinelli D, Tassorelli C, Terrazzino S. Lack of association between TRPV1 gene polymorphisms and risk of migraine chronification: a case-control study and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2025 Jan;46(1):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07724-0. Epub 2024 Aug 6. PubMed 39105976 ↗
  • Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ. Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Oct;50(10):1644-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50455.x. PubMed 12366617 ↗
  • Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F, Casciaro E, Di Paola M, Quarta E, Muratore M, Casciaro S. Major osteoporotic fragility fractures: Risk factor updates and societal impact. World J Orthop. 2016 Mar 18;7(3):171-81. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.171. eCollection 2016 Mar 18. PubMed 27004165 ↗
  • Dahlgren MK, Lambros AM, Smith RT, Sagar KA, El-Abboud C, Gruber SA. Clinical and cognitive improvement following full-spectrum, high-cannabidiol treatment for anxiety: open-label data from a two-stage, phase 2 clinical trial. Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Nov 2;2(1):139. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00202-8. PubMed 36352103 ↗
  • Dahlgren MK, Gonenc A, Sagar KA, Smith RT, Lambros AM, El-Abboud C, Gruber SA. Increased White Matter Coherence Following Three and Six Months of Medical Cannabis Treatment. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022 Dec;7(6):827-839. doi: 10.1089/can.2022.0097. Epub 2022 Nov 11. PubMed 36367574 ↗
  • Kaufmann R, Harris Bozer A, Jotte ARK, Aqua K. The Effects of Long-Term Self-Dosing of Cannabidiol on Drowsiness, Testosterone Levels, and Liver Function. Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2023 Mar 22;6(1):32-40. doi: 10.1159/000529677. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. PubMed 36968131 ↗
  • Kaufmann R, Bozer AH, Jotte AK, Aqua K. Long-Term, Self-Dosing CBD Users: Indications, Dosage, and Self-Perceptions on General Health/Symptoms and Drug Use. Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2023 Aug 16;6(1):77-88. doi: 10.1159/000531666. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. PubMed 37900894 ↗
  • Rohacs T. Phosphoinositide regulation of TRPV1 revisited. Pflugers Arch. 2015 Sep;467(9):1851-69. doi: 10.1007/s00424-015-1695-3. Epub 2015 Mar 11. PubMed 25754030 ↗
  • Ibrahim I, Syamala S, Ayariga JA, Xu J, Robertson BK, Meenakshisundaram S, Ajayi OS. Modulatory Effect of Gut Microbiota on the Gut-Brain, Gut-Bone Axes, and the Impact of Cannabinoids. Metabolites. 2022 Dec 10;12(12):1247. doi: 10.3390/metabo12121247. PubMed 36557285 ↗
  • Kuo TR, Chen CH. Bone biomarker for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis: recent developments and future perspectives. Biomark Res. 2017 May 18;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40364-017-0097-4. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28529755 ↗
  • Holzer P, Izzo AA. The pharmacology of TRP channels. Br J Pharmacol. 2014 May;171(10):2469-73. doi: 10.1111/bph.12723. PubMed 24773265 ↗
  • Schurman LD, Lu D, Kendall DA, Howlett AC, Lichtman AH. Molecular Mechanism and Cannabinoid Pharmacology. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2020;258:323-353. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_298. PubMed 32236882 ↗
  • Tudorancea IM, Ciorpac M, Stanciu GD, Caratasu C, Sacarescu A, Ignat B, Burlui A, Rezus E, Creanga I, Alexa-Stratulat T, Tudorancea I, Tamba BI. The Therapeutic Potential of the Endocannabinoid System in Age-Related Diseases. Biomedicines. 2022 Oct 6;10(10):2492. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102492. PubMed 36289755 ↗
  • Koivisto AP, Voets T, Iadarola MJ, Szallasi A. Targeting TRP channels for pain relief: A review of current evidence from bench to bedside. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2024 Apr;75:102447. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2024.102447. Epub 2024 Mar 11. PubMed 38471384 ↗
  • Katz B, Zaguri R, Edvardson S, Maayan C, Elpeleg O, Lev S, Davidson E, Peters M, Kfir-Erenfeld S, Berger E, Ghazalin S, Binshtok AM, Minke B. Nociception and pain in humans lacking a functional TRPV1 channel. J Clin Invest. 2023 Feb 1;133(3):e153558. doi: 10.1172/JCI153558. PubMed 36454632 ↗
  • Yamada Y, Ando F, Shimokata H. Association of candidate gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density in community-dwelling Japanese women and men. Int J Mol Med. 2007 May;19(5):791-801. PubMed 17390085 ↗
  • Xin Y, Tang A, Pan S, Zhang J. Components of the Endocannabinoid System and Effects of Cannabinoids Against Bone Diseases: A Mini-Review. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 19;12:793750. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.793750. eCollection 2021. PubMed 35126132 ↗
  • Raphael-Mizrahi B, Gabet Y. The Cannabinoids Effect on Bone Formation and Bone Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2020 Oct;18(5):433-438. doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00607-1. PubMed 32705630 ↗
  • Saponaro F, Ferrisi R, Gado F, Polini B, Saba A, Manera C, Chiellini G. The Role of Cannabinoids in Bone Metabolism: A New Perspective for Bone Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 16;22(22):12374. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212374. PubMed 34830256 ↗
  • Rossi F, Tortora C, Punzo F, Bellini G, Argenziano M, Di Paola A, Torella M, Perrotta S. The Endocannabinoid/Endovanilloid System in Bone: From Osteoporosis to Osteosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 18;20(8):1919. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081919. PubMed 31003519 ↗
  • Rossi F, Bellini G, Luongo L, Torella M, Mancusi S, De Petrocellis L, Petrosino S, Siniscalco D, Orlando P, Scafuro M, Colacurci N, Perrotta S, Nobili B, Di Marzo V, Maione S; Endocannabinoid Research Group (ERG), Italy. The endovanilloid/endocannabinoid system: a new potential target for osteoporosis therapy. Bone. 2011 May 1;48(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 13. PubMed 21237298 ↗
  • Liu N, Lu W, Dai X, Qu X, Zhu C. The role of TRPV channels in osteoporosis. Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Jan;49(1):577-585. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06794-z. Epub 2021 Oct 25. PubMed 34694549 ↗
  • Arnold JC, Hone P, Holland ML, Allen JD. CB2 and TRPV1 receptors mediate cannabinoid actions on MDR1 expression in multidrug resistant cells. Pharmacol Rep. 2012;64(3):751-7. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(12)70871-x. PubMed 22814029 ↗
  • Urits I, Charipova K, Gress K, Li N, Berger AA, Cornett EM, Kassem H, Ngo AL, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Adverse Effects of Recreational and Medical Cannabis. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2021 Jan 12;51(1):94-109. doi: 10.64719/pb.4395. PubMed 33897066 ↗
  • Gordon-Shaag A, Zagotta WN, Gordon SE. Mechanism of Ca(2+)-dependent desensitization in TRP channels. Channels (Austin). 2008 Mar-Apr;2(2):125-9. doi: 10.4161/chan.2.2.6026. Epub 2008 Mar 16. PubMed 18849652 ↗
  • Rosasco MG, Gordon SE. TRP Channels: What Do They Look Like? In: Emir TLR, editor. Neurobiology of TRP Channels. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2017. Chapter 1. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK476119/ PubMed 29356490 ↗
  • Caterina MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature. 1997 Oct 23;389(6653):816-24. doi: 10.1038/39807. PubMed 9349813 ↗
  • Wang L, Hong PJ, May C, Rehman Y, Oparin Y, Hong CJ, Hong BY, AminiLari M, Gallo L, Kaushal A, Craigie S, Couban RJ, Kum E, Shanthanna H, Price I, Upadhye S, Ware MA, Campbell F, Buchbinder R, Agoritsas T, Busse JW. Medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic non-cancer and cancer related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2021 Sep 8;374:n1034. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1034. PubMed 34497047 ↗
  • Karsak M, Cohen-Solal M, Freudenberg J, Ostertag A, Morieux C, Kornak U, Essig J, Erxlebe E, Bab I, Kubisch C, de Vernejoul MC, Zimmer A. Cannabinoid receptor type 2 gene is associated with human osteoporosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2005 Nov 15;14(22):3389-96. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi370. Epub 2005 Oct 4. PubMed 16204352 ↗
  • Zhang H, Sol-Church K, Rydbeck H, Stabley D, Spotila LD, Devoto M. High resolution linkage and linkage disequilibrium analyses of chromosome 1p36 SNPs identify new positional candidate genes for low bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2009 Feb;20(2):341-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0668-1. Epub 2008 Jul 3. PubMed 18597038 ↗
  • Devoto M, Specchia C, Li HH, Caminis J, Tenenhouse A, Rodriguez H, Spotila LD. Variance component linkage analysis indicates a QTL for femoral neck bone mineral density on chromosome 1p36. Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Oct 1;10(21):2447-52. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.21.2447. PubMed 11689491 ↗
  • Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Aug;9(8):1137-41. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090802. No abstract available. PubMed 7976495 ↗
  • Tam J, Hinden L, Drori A, Udi S, Azar S, Baraghithy S. The therapeutic potential of targeting the peripheral endocannabinoid/CB1 receptor system. Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Mar;49:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 11. PubMed 29336868 ↗
  • Tam J, Trembovler V, Di Marzo V, Petrosino S, Leo G, Alexandrovich A, Regev E, Casap N, Shteyer A, Ledent C, Karsak M, Zimmer A, Mechoulam R, Yirmiya R, Shohami E, Bab I. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor regulates bone formation by modulating adrenergic signaling. FASEB J. 2008 Jan;22(1):285-94. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7957com. Epub 2007 Aug 17. PubMed 17704191 ↗
  • Sophocleous A, Marino S, Kabir D, Ralston SH, Idris AI. Combined deficiency of the Cnr1 and Cnr2 receptors protects against age-related bone loss by osteoclast inhibition. Aging Cell. 2017 Oct;16(5):1051-1061. doi: 10.1111/acel.12638. Epub 2017 Jul 28. PubMed 28752643 ↗
  • Bab I, Zimmer A, Melamed E. Cannabinoids and the skeleton: from marijuana to reversal of bone loss. Ann Med. 2009;41(8):560-7. doi: 10.1080/07853890903121025. PubMed 19634029 ↗
  • Idris AI, Sophocleous A, Landao-Bassonga E, van't Hof RJ, Ralston SH. Regulation of bone mass, osteoclast function, and ovariectomy-induced bone loss by the type 2 cannabinoid receptor. Endocrinology. 2008 Nov;149(11):5619-26. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0150. Epub 2008 Jul 17. PubMed 18635663 ↗
  • Bab I, Ofek O, Tam J, Rehnelt J, Zimmer A. Endocannabinoids and the regulation of bone metabolism. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008 May;20 Suppl 1:69-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01675.x. PubMed 18426503 ↗
  • Bab I, Zimmer A. Cannabinoid receptors and the regulation of bone mass. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;153(2):182-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707593. Epub 2007 Dec 10. PubMed 18071301 ↗
  • Zhang YW, Li YJ, Lu PP, Dai GC, Chen XX, Rui YF. The modulatory effect and implication of gut microbiota on osteoporosis: from the perspective of "brain-gut-bone" axis. Food Funct. 2021 Jul 7;12(13):5703-5718. doi: 10.1039/d0fo03468a. Epub 2021 May 28. PubMed 34048514 ↗
  • Ofek O, Karsak M, Leclerc N, Fogel M, Frenkel B, Wright K, Tam J, Attar-Namdar M, Kram V, Shohami E, Mechoulam R, Zimmer A, Bab I. Peripheral cannabinoid receptor, CB2, regulates bone mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 17;103(3):696-701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504187103. Epub 2006 Jan 9. PubMed 16407142 ↗
  • Idris AI, van 't Hof RJ, Greig IR, Ridge SA, Baker D, Ross RA, Ralston SH. Regulation of bone mass, bone loss and osteoclast activity by cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med. 2005 Jul;11(7):774-9. doi: 10.1038/nm1255. Epub 2005 May 22. PubMed 15908955 ↗
  • Safi K, Sobieraj J, Blaszkiewicz M, Zyla J, Salata B, Dzierzanowski T. Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol for Pain Treatment-An Update on the Evidence. Biomedicines. 2024 Jan 29;12(2):307. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020307. PubMed 38397910 ↗
  • Crescente G, Minervini G, Spagnuolo C, Moccia S. Cannabis Bioactive Compound-Based Formulations: New Perspectives for the Management of Orofacial Pain. Molecules. 2022 Dec 23;28(1):106. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010106. PubMed 36615298 ↗
  • Boehnke KF, Gagnier JJ, Matallana L, Williams DA. Substituting Cannabidiol for Opioids and Pain Medications Among Individuals With Fibromyalgia: A Large Online Survey. J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 13. PubMed 33992787 ↗
  • Kurlyandchik I, Tiralongo E, Schloss J. Safety and Efficacy of Medicinal Cannabis in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review. J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):198-213. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0331. Epub 2020 Dec 8. PubMed 33337931 ↗
  • Sagy I, Bar-Lev Schleider L, Abu-Shakra M, Novack V. Safety and Efficacy of Medical Cannabis in Fibromyalgia. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 5;8(6):807. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060807. PubMed 31195754 ↗
  • Chaves C, Bittencourt PCT, Pelegrini A. Ingestion of a THC-Rich Cannabis Oil in People with Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2212-2218. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa303. PubMed 33118602 ↗
  • Mazza M. Medical cannabis for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome: a retrospective, open-label case series. J Cannabis Res. 2021 Feb 17;3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42238-021-00060-6. PubMed 33597032 ↗
  • Khurshid H, Qureshi IA, Jahan N, Went TR, Sultan W, Sapkota A, Alfonso M. A Systematic Review of Fibromyalgia and Recent Advancements in Treatment: Is Medicinal Cannabis a New Hope? Cureus. 2021 Aug 20;13(8):e17332. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17332. eCollection 2021 Aug. PubMed 34567876 ↗
  • Bourke SL, Schlag AK, O'Sullivan SE, Nutt DJ, Finn DP. Cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system in fibromyalgia: A review of preclinical and clinical research. Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Dec;240:108216. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108216. Epub 2022 May 21. PubMed 35609718 ↗
  • May A, Benoliel R, Imamura Y, Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Hoffmann J. Orofacial pain for clinicians: A review of constant and attack-like facial pain syndromes. Cephalalgia. 2023 Aug;43(8):3331024231187160. doi: 10.1177/03331024231187160. PubMed 37548299 ↗
  • Haroutounian S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Belton J, Blyth FM, Degenhardt L, Di Forti M, Eccleston C, Finn DP, Finnerup NB, Fisher E, Fogarty AE, Gilron I, Hohmann AG, Kalso E, Krane E, Mohiuddin M, Moore RA, Rowbotham M, Soliman N, Wallace M, Zinboonyahgoon N, Rice ASC. International Association for the Study of Pain Presidential Task Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Analgesia: research agenda on the use of cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines for pain management. Pain. 2021 Jul 1;162(Suppl 1):S117-S124. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002266. PubMed 34138827 ↗
  • Bhaskar A, Bell A, Boivin M, Briques W, Brown M, Clarke H, Cyr C, Eisenberg E, de Oliveira Silva RF, Frohlich E, Georgius P, Hogg M, Horsted TI, MacCallum CA, Muller-Vahl KR, O'Connell C, Sealey R, Seibolt M, Sihota A, Smith BK, Sulak D, Vigano A, Moulin DE. Consensus recommendations on dosing and administration of medical cannabis to treat chronic pain: results of a modified Delphi process. J Cannabis Res. 2021 Jul 2;3(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s42238-021-00073-1. PubMed 34215346 ↗
  • Glare P, Chye R, Bloch M, Arya M, Moore A, Montgomery J. Tolerability and Efficacy of a 10:25 Preparation of Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol for Treatment of Chronic Back or Neck Pain: A Multiple-Dose Escalation Study. Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2023 Jul 7;6(1):66-76. doi: 10.1159/000531232. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. PubMed 37465637 ↗
  • Gignac MA, Davis AM, Hawker G, Wright JG, Mahomed N, Fortin PR, Badley EM. "What do you expect? You're just getting older": A comparison of perceived osteoarthritis-related and aging-related health experiences in middle- and older-age adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec 15;55(6):905-12. doi: 10.1002/art.22338. PubMed 17139636 ↗
  • Brozek JL, Akl EA, Compalati E, Kreis J, Terracciano L, Fiocchi A, Ueffing E, Andrews J, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl JJ, Lang DM, Jaeschke R, Williams JW Jr, Phillips B, Lethaby A, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Helfand M, Watine J, Afilalo M, Welch V, Montedori A, Abraha I, Horvath AR, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schunemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations. Allergy. 2011 May;66(5):588-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02530.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17. PubMed 21241318 ↗
  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, Schunemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1049-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE. PubMed 18467413 ↗
  • Kreling MC, da Cruz DA, Pimenta CA. [Prevalence of chronic pain in adult workers]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2006 Jul-Aug;59(4):509-13. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672006000400007. Portuguese. PubMed 17340726 ↗
  • Kinds MB, Welsing PM, Vignon EP, Bijlsma JW, Viergever MA, Marijnissen AC, Lafeber FP. A systematic review of the association between radiographic and clinical osteoarthritis of hip and knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):768-78. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Jan 31. PubMed 21281726 ↗
  • Felson DT, McAlindon TE, Anderson JJ, Naimark A, Weissman BW, Aliabadi P, Evans S, Levy D, LaValley MP. Defining radiographic osteoarthritis for the whole knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997 Jul;5(4):241-50. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(97)80020-9. PubMed 9404469 ↗
  • LaValley MP, McAlindon TE, Chaisson CE, Levy D, Felson DT. The validity of different definitions of radiographic worsening for longitudinal studies of knee osteoarthritis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jan;54(1):30-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00273-0. PubMed 11165466 ↗
  • Schiphof D, de Klerk BM, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Good reliability, questionable validity of 25 different classification criteria of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic appraisal. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1205-1215.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 Sep 7. PubMed 18782658 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07783295
Lead sponsor
Associação Pan-Americana Multidisciplinar de Endocanabinologia
Collaborators
Mackenzie Presbiterian University, São Paulo, Brazil, Associação Brasileira de Cannabis Medicinal
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Study contacts

Alethéia B P Barbosa, PhD
Contact
abpablos@gmail.com
+55 11 97247-1484
José Wilson N V Andrade, MD
Contact
dr.jwilsonandrade@gmail.com
+55 11 971905328
Alethéia B P Barbosa, PhD
principal investigator · Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dronabinol

Start the discussion