An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), sponsored by Happitech BV. Recruiting at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 22 Minutes and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.
Sponsored by Happitech BV · Observational
Among 993 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in United States — 161 open to participants now, 220 under way, 15 of them phase 3. Atrial Fibrillation · United States.
Among the 993 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in United States, this one is the 91st largest by planned enrollment of the 308 observational ones that give a count, is one of 48 that started in 2026, is one of 308 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 64 of the 219 other live ones, and was the 990th registered.
4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 960 are open to participants now.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →161 of the 993 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Kardium Inc. · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Boston Scientific Corporation · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Bayer · Sites in United States, Belgium, Bulgaria and 5 more countries
Ages 18–85
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Oslo University Hospital · Sites in United States, Belgium, France and 7 more countries
Ages 18+
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 611 Atrial Fibrillation studies recruiting now, 407 (67%) set no upper age limit and 43 (7%) stop at 75 or younger; 21 take children under 18; 43 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 22 Minutes and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
993 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 30 · Phase 2 71 · Phase 3 107 · Phase 4 87
First in 1989; this study’s year is marked. 48 started in 2026.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 554 is above the median of 300 across 1,400 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Median enrollment 127 across the 679 interventional studies, 200 across the 308 observational. Of the 675 that completed or were terminated, 304 (45%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
349 of 993 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
This is the only study on the registry with Happitech BV as lead sponsor.
Happitech BV has 1 study filed under Atrial Fibrillation — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
74 of the studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 5 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT06376916Phase 3Wake Forest University Health SciencesComparing Magnesium 2g Versus 4g Versus Placebo in the Incidence of Treating AFF RVR | 2026-12 |
| NCT05757869Phase 3Janssen Research & Development, LLCA Study of Milvexian Versus Apixaban in Participants With Atrial Fibrillation | 2026-12-08 |
| NCT03907046Phase 3Yale UniversityAnticoagulation in ICH Survivors for Stroke Prevention and Recovery | 2027-04 |
| NCT05174052Phase 3University of OklahomaDapagliflozin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (DAPA-AF) | 2027-04 |
| NCT02750319Phase 3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAmiodarone and N-Acetylcysteine or Amiodarone Alone for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Thoracic Surgery | 2027-04 |
Add all 74 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 993 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The protocol is designed to enroll patients from at least 3 diverse clinical sites with smartphones who are being evaluated for the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) using the Heart Rhythm Software algorithm running on their smartphones. Algorithm output will be compared to a gold standard of 12-lead ECG recorded with a simultaneous PPG measurement.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing and is expected to continue increasing for decades,. Detection of AF episodes may be useful for the identification of undiagnosed AF and in making clinical management decisions that include oral anticoagulation, restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, control of ventricular rate, and risk factor modification. Treatment of AF is associated with improvements of quality of life, stroke prevention, and reduced risk of heart failure.
Traditionally, diagnosis of AF is done using an electrocardiogram, with low amplitude or absent p-waves and narrow complex "irregularly irregular" pattern intervals seen on the ECG,. After diagnosis, there are a variety of methods that can be used to manage AF. Ambulatory ECG monitoring, implantable monitoring devices, and over-the-counter wrist-worn devices have been used to manage patients with AF,,. However, these devices are inconvenient and expensive which limits their wide adoption into clinical practice. There is an unmet clinical need for an easy to use and inexpensive over-the-counter FDA-cleared products that can detect episodes of AF in real-time and notify patients to seek out further care when AF is suspected.
Recent technological advancements have allowed for the identification of AF using smartwatches, with device manufacturers gaining over-the-counter regulatory clearance for their irregular heart rate detection algorithms,. These wrist-worn devices use a light-based measurement method called photoplethysmography (PPG) to measure changes in light absorbance and reflectance to understand changes in blood flow in superficial vasculature. The waveform generated from this measurement can be used to measure parameters like pulse rate, respiratory rate, pulse rate variability and others in addition to detecting AF. The increasing ubiquity of smartphones worldwide has led to greater availability of heart rhythm diagnostics using smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG). Smartphone camera PPG technology uses the light-emitting diode in cameras to measure pulsatile changes in light intensity that are reflected from a finger and can be used to detect AF. The widespread availability of this technology has the potential to improve the accessibility and convenience of heart rhythm monitoring, particularly in remote or underserved areas. This could result in improvements in early detection and management of AF, leading to better patient outcomes. Several smartphone PPG-based algorithms have been developed that utilize smartphones' built-in cameras to detect AF. The sensitivity and specificity of these algorithms for the detection of AF range between 81%-100% and 85%-100% respectively. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the performance of these algorithms in detecting AF in an out-of-hospital setting using a gold-standard reference.
Happitech has developed a proprietary software development kit (SDK) that can be utilized to measure patients' cardiovascular parameters and identify potential pathologies including AF. Happitech's algorithm requires users to place a digit directly against their phone camera, and the camera and underlying algorithm detect subtle differences in blood flow to calculate physiological parameters for monitoring and clinical use.
The purpose of this study is to validate the performance of Happitech's PPG-based algorithm for the detection of AF against a 12-lead ECG in a diverse population of patients including cardiology patients being evaluated as inpatients or at a cardiology clinic visit.
Male and female patients aged 22 years or older who are cardiology patients consulting the cardiac outpatient clinic, 50% of whom have a rhythm of atrial fibrillation at the time of enrollment, and own a smartphone.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patient visiting the Cardiology Clinic in Sinus Rhythm
Diagnostic Test: 12 Lead ECG is compared to a smartphone based PPG
Patient visiting the Cardiology Clinic in Atrial Fibrillation
Diagnostic Test: 12 Lead ECG is compared to a smartphone based PPG
Patient visiting the Cardiology Clinic with neither Sinus Rhythm or Atrial Fibrillation
Diagnostic Test: 12 Lead ECG is compared to a smartphone based PPG
12 Lead ECG is compared to a smartphone based PPG
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Heart Rhythm Software
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Heart Rhythm Software algorithm running on a commercially available smartphone to detect atrial fibrillation segments using photoplethysmography (PPG) as measured through the phone's camera. Se is defined as the percentage of patients with 90 second interval recordings scored by the Heart Rhythm Software algorithm as AF, out of all intervals determined by the Clinical Adjudication Committee (CAC) to be AF (gold standard). Sp is defined as the percentage of patients with 90 second intervals scored by the Heart Rhythm Software algorithm as NSR out of all ECG recordings determined by the CAC to be NSR.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Sensitivity & Specificity across subgroups
The accuracy of the Happitech Heart Rhythm Software algorithm in detecting irregular rhythm suspected of AF and regular rhythm suspected normal sinus rhythm will be further investigated in subgroups defined by ethnicity, race, BMI, age group, smartphone type, and Fitzpatrick scale score. The sensitivity and specificity will be presented as an estimate and associated 95% CI's, as well as a Chi-square or Fisher's Exact p-value to assess if all levels of the subgroup are homogeneous.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 5 months after the start.
Of 148 industry-sponsored observational studies under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 5 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 698 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 76.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.