ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07778550Updated Aug 21, 2026

Effects of Diet, Exercise, and Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Overweight and Obese Women

An interventional study of Individualized Energy-Restricted Diet and Moderate-Intensity Walking in Obesity & Overweight, sponsored by Dicle University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 19 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by Dicle University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 352 studies in Obesity with a site in Turkey — 72 open to participants now, 90 under way, 16 of them phase 3. Obesity · Turkey.

Enrollment
81st of 191
75 · median 64
Started
2026
with 58 others
No phase
160 of 352
28 open now
Registered
320th of 352
by date

Among the 352 studies in Obesity with a site in Turkey, this one is the 81st largest by enrollment of the 191 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 59 that started in 2026, is one of 160 with no phase, and was the 320th registered.

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

Browse Obesity studies →

Open to participants now

72 of the 352 studies in Obesity with a site in Turkey are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

67 more — sign in →

All 72 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Turkey have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Turkey →

Who these studies take

Of the 1,336 Obesity studies recruiting now, 377 (28%) set no upper age limit and 856 (64%) stop at 75 or younger; 168 take children under 18; 491 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 19 Years to 45 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 352 studies in Obesity with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This randomized controlled study evaluated the effects of diet, exercise, and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on body measurements, blood test results, and appetite in women with overweight or obesity.

A total of 75 women aged 19-45 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or higher were randomly assigned to one of three groups: diet alone, diet plus exercise, or diet plus EMS. All participants received an individualized energy-restricted diet. Participants in the exercise group also performed at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity walking daily, while participants in the EMS group received abdominal EMS twice per week for six weeks.

Body measurements, selected biochemical parameters, and appetite-related measures, including hunger, satiety, and desire to eat, were assessed before and after the six-week intervention. The study aimed to determine whether adding exercise or EMS to an individualized energy-restricted diet provides additional benefits for body composition, metabolic health, and appetite regulation in women with overweight or obesity.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled study included 75 women aged 19-45 years with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m²). Eligible participants were randomly assigned to three intervention groups, with 25 participants in each group.

All participants received an individualized energy-restricted dietary program designed to provide an energy deficit of approximately 500 kcal/day. The dietary plans provided approximately 55-60% of total energy from carbohydrates, 12-15% from protein, and 25-30% from fat, with a target dietary fiber intake of 25-30 g/day. Participants attended weekly follow-up visits throughout the intervention.

Participants in the Diet Group received the individualized dietary intervention alone. Participants in the Diet + Exercise Group received the same dietary intervention and were instructed to perform at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity walking daily throughout the six-week intervention. Participants in the Diet + EMS Group received the dietary intervention together with localized abdominal electrical muscle stimulation. EMS was administered twice weekly on non-consecutive days for six weeks, for a total of 12 sessions. Each EMS session lasted approximately 25 minutes.

Anthropometric assessments included body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, neck circumference, mid-upper arm circumference, body fat percentage, fat mass, and fat-free mass. Selected biochemical parameters were assessed using fasting blood samples. Appetite-related outcomes, including hunger, satiety, and desire to eat, were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Measurements were obtained at baseline and after completion of the six-week intervention. The primary objective was to compare changes in anthropometric outcomes among the three intervention groups. Additional evaluations examined changes in biochemical parameters and subjective appetite-related outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Obesity & Overweight

Keywords

  • Electrical Muscle Stimulation
  • diet
  • weight loss
  • appetite
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants aged 19-45 years
  • (BMI) ≥25.0 kg/m²
  • No more than a 5% change in body weight during the previous 3 months
  • Premenopausal
  • Not participating in a regular exercise program
  • Applying to the center for weight management
  • Willing to participate and providing written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of thrombosis or active thrombotic risk
  • Diagnosed hypertension
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Epilepsy
  • History of abdominal, gastric, or inguinal hernia
  • Cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic device
  • Metallic prostheses or large implants
  • Bariatric surgery within the previous 6 months
  • Use of pharmacological treatments that could affect weight loss, including GLP-1 receptor agonists or
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Advanced renal or hepatic disease
  • Any medical condition contraindicating EMS application
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Diet

    Participants received an individualized energy-restricted diet program with an energy deficit of approximately 500 kcal/day for 6 weeks.

    Behavioral: Individualized Energy-Restricted Diet

  • Experimental
    Diet + Exercise

    Participants received the individualized energy-restricted diet program and were instructed to perform at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity walking daily throughout the 6-week intervention period.

    Behavioral: Individualized Energy-Restricted Diet · Behavioral: Moderate-Intensity Walking

  • Experimental
    Diet + Electrical Muscle Stimulation

    Participants received the individualized energy-restricted diet program in addition to localized abdominal electrical muscle stimulation (EMS). EMS was administered twice weekly on non-consecutive days for 6 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions, with each session lasting approximately 25 minutes.

    Behavioral: Individualized Energy-Restricted Diet · Device: Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS)

Interventions

  • BehavioralIndividualized Energy-Restricted Diet

    Participants received an individualized energy-restricted diet designed to provide an energy deficit of approximately 500 kcal/day. The diet provided 55-60% of total energy from carbohydrates, 12-15% from protein, and 25-30% from fat, with a target fiber intake of 25-30 g/day. Participants attended weekly follow-up visits throughout the 6-week intervention period.

  • BehavioralModerate-Intensity Walking

    Participants were instructed to perform at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity walking daily throughout the 6-week intervention period. Walking intensity was defined as producing a slight increase in heart rate and breathing while allowing participants to maintain conversation comfortably.

  • DeviceElectrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS)

    Localized abdominal electrical muscle stimulation was administered twice weekly on non-consecutive days for 6 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions. Each session lasted approximately 25 minutes. Four surface electrodes were positioned symmetrically on the abdominal region. Stimulation was delivered at 85 Hz with a pulse width of approximately 300-400 μs, and intensity was increased according to individual tolerance to achieve visible and palpable muscle contractions without pain or discomfort.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight

    Body weight was measured in kilograms using a bioelectrical impedance analysis device (InBody 270) at baseline and after completion of the intervention. Change in body weight was evaluated by comparing the post-intervention measurement with the baseline measurement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m²) at baseline and after the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  2. Change in Body Fat Percentage

    Body fat percentage was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 270) at baseline and after the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  3. Change in Fat Mass

    Fat mass was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 270) at baseline and after the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  4. Change in Fat-Free Mass

    Fat-free mass was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 270) at baseline and after the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Fasting Blood Glucose

    Fasting blood glucose was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  2. Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    HbA1c was assessed at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  3. Change in Fasting Insulin

    Fasting insulin was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  4. Change in HOMA-IR

    HOMA-IR was calculated using fasting glucose and fasting insulin values at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  5. Change in Total Cholesterol

    Total cholesterol was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  6. Change in LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C)

    LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  7. Change in HDL Cholesterol (HDL-C)

    HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  8. Change in Triglycerides

    Triglyceride levels were assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  9. Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

    Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  10. Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

    Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  11. Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  12. Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

    Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  13. Change in Serum Creatinine

    Serum creatinine was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  14. Change in Serum Iron

    Serum iron was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  15. Change in Vitamin B12

    Serum vitamin B12 was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  16. Change in 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]

    Serum 25(OH)D was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  17. Change in Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH)

    TSH was assessed using fasting blood samples at baseline and after completion of the 6-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

  18. Change in Appetite-Related Visual Analog Scale Scores

    Hunger, satiety, and desire to eat were assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and after the 6-week intervention. Higher scores indicated greater intensity of the respective appetite sensation. Changes in hunger, satiety, and desire-to-eat scores were evaluated between baseline and post-intervention measurements.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Feray ÇAĞIRAN YILMAZ
    Kayapınar, Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — upon reasonable request

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2026 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 2 months.

Of 3,680 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Obesity, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,843 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 11, 2026
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2026
CompletionActual
May 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07778550
Lead sponsor
Dicle University
Responsible party
Feray ÇAĞIRAN YILMAZ (Associate Professor, Dicle University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026
Completion
May 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion