ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07462364PainUpdated Mar 13, 2026

The Effect of a Kaleidoscope and Cartoons for Dental Treatment in Children

An interventional study of Kaleidoscope Distraction and Cartoon Distraction in Dental Anxiety, Dental Fear and Pain, sponsored by Dicle University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 7 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-13.

Sponsored by Dicle University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dental fear and anxiety are among the most common challenges encountered in pediatric dental practice and may negatively affect children's cooperation and acceptance of dental treatment. Local anesthesia injections are considered one of the main sources of pain and anxiety during dental procedures in children. Although pharmacological methods can be effective in managing pain and anxiety, they may not always be preferred due to potential side effects, limited applicability, and the possibility of increasing stress in children. Therefore, non-pharmacological behavioral management techniques, particularly distraction methods, are increasingly used in pediatric dentistry to reduce pain perception and anxiety.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effects of kaleidoscope use and cartoon distraction on pain, fear, and anxiety associated with local anesthesia injections in children undergoing dental treatment. The study will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University. A total of 126 children aged between 7 and 12 years who require local infiltration anesthesia during dental treatment will be included in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: the Kaleidoscope Group, the Cartoon Distraction Group, or the Control Group. Children in the kaleidoscope group will use a kaleidoscope during the local anesthesia injection, while children in the cartoon group will watch cartoons during the procedure. In the control group, local anesthesia will be administered according to the routine clinical procedure without any distraction technique.

Pain, fear, and anxiety levels will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, the Children's Fear Scale, and the Children's Anxiety Scale-State. Behavioral responses will also be evaluated using the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale. The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of simple and non-pharmacological distraction techniques in reducing pain and anxiety associated with local anesthesia injections in pediatric dental patients.

Read the detailed description

Dental fear and anxiety are common in pediatric dentistry and can negatively affect children's cooperation and acceptance of treatment. Local anesthesia injections are a major source of pain and anxiety in children during dental procedures. While pharmacological methods may be effective in managing pain and anxiety, non-pharmacological behavioral techniques, particularly distraction methods, are increasingly used to reduce discomfort.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of two distraction techniques-kaleidoscope use and cartoon viewing-on pain, fear, and anxiety associated with local anesthetic injections in children undergoing dental treatment. The study will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University.

A total of 126 children aged 7-12 years who require local infiltration anesthesia will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Kaleidoscope Group, Cartoon Distraction Group, or Control Group. Children in the Kaleidoscope Group will use a kaleidoscope during the injection, while children in the Cartoon Group will watch cartoons. In the Control Group, injections will be administered according to routine clinical procedures without distraction.

Pain, fear, and anxiety will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, the Children's Fear Scale, and the Children's Anxiety Scale-State. Behavioral responses will be evaluated with the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale. Data collection will occur during the dental procedure and immediately after the injection.

This study is expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness of simple, non-pharmacological distraction techniques in reducing pain and anxiety in pediatric patients undergoing local anesthesia injections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Anxiety
  • Dental Fear
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dental anxiety, dental fear, pain, local anesthesia, children
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 126 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Dicle University is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged between 7 and 12 years
  • Children requiring local infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment
  • Children who apply to the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry
  • Children and their parents who voluntarily agree to participate in the study and provide
  • Children with positive or definitely positive behavior according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with chronic diseases
  • Children with a history of hospitalization or surgery
  • Children with neurological or behavioral disorders such as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or learning disabilities
  • Children with mental retardation, hearing impairment, or speech problems
  • Children with dental abscesses or fistulas
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kaleidoscope Group

    Children in this group will use a kaleidoscope during the administration of local infiltration anesthesia as a visual distraction technique. The child will be instructed on how to use the kaleidoscope before the injection and will continue using it throughout the procedure

    Behavioral: Kaleidoscope Distraction

  • Experimental
    Cartoon Distraction Group

    Children in this group will watch cartoons as an audiovisual distraction technique during the administration of local infiltration anesthesia. The cartoon will be started before the injection and will continue throughout the procedure.

    Behavioral: Cartoon Distraction

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Children in this group will receive local infiltration anesthesia according to the routine clinical procedure without the use of any distraction technique.

Interventions

  • BehavioralKaleidoscope Distraction

    Children will use a kaleidoscope as a visual distraction technique during the administration of local infiltration anesthesia. Before the procedure, the researcher will explain how to use the kaleidoscope, and the child will continue using it throughout the injection.

  • BehavioralCartoon Distraction

    Children will watch cartoons as an audiovisual distraction technique during the administration of local infiltration anesthesia. The cartoon will be started immediately before the injection and will continue throughout the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain level during local anesthesia injection measured using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale

    Pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. The scale consists of six facial expressions representing increasing levels of pain, scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Children will be asked to select the face that best represents the pain they experienced during the injection.

    Time frame: Immediately after the local anesthesia injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fear level during local anesthesia injection measured using the Children's Fear Scale

    Children's fear level during the dental injection procedure will be assessed using the Children's Fear Scale. The scale includes five facial expressions ranging from 0 (no fear) to 4 (extreme fear). The child will indicate the face that best represents their level of fear.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after the local anesthesia injection

  2. Anxiety level measured using the Children's Anxiety Scale-State (CAS-S)

    Children's situational anxiety level will be assessed using the Children's Anxiety Scale-State. The scale is designed as a thermometer-like visual scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher anxiety levels.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after the local anesthesia injection

  3. Child behavior during dental treatment measured using the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale

    Children's behavior during the dental procedure will be evaluated using the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale, which categorizes behavior into four levels: definitely negative, negative, positive, and definitely positive.

    Time frame: During the local anesthesia administration procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University
    Diyarbakır, Diyarbakır 21000, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2026, 1 month after the start.

Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 5, 2026
First posted
Mar 10, 2026
StartActual
Mar 10, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 10, 2026
Last update
Mar 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07462364
Lead sponsor
Dicle University
Responsible party
Elif Bilsin Kocamaz (Associate Professor, Dicle University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2026
Start date
Mar 10, 2026
Primary completion
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2026

Study contacts

Elif Bilsin Kocamaz, PhD
Contact
elifbilsin-86@hotmail.com
+904122411000 ext. 2693
Sumeyye Tokmak, BsN
Contact
tokmak.2113@gmail.com
+904122411000 ext. 2693
Elif Bilsin Kocamaz, Associate Professor
study director · Dicle University
Elif Bilsin kocamaz, PhD
study director · Dicle University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion