CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07770282Updated Aug 18, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Versus Placebo on Cardiometabolic Profile in Patients With Schizophrenia With Metabolic Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of Semaglutide + TAU and Placebo + TAU in Schizophrenia Disorder, Metabolic Syndrome and Antipsychotic-induced Weight Gain, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with schizophrenia on second-generation antipsychotics have a high burden of metabolic syndrome and elevated cardiovascular risk, with few effective treatment options. This multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial evaluates whether adjunctive oral semaglutide 3 mg once daily, added to treatment as usual, reduces 10-year cardiovascular risk (QRISK3) and improves insulin resistance, lipids, weight and metabolic biomarkers over 24 weeks compared with placebo, while confirming psychiatric safety and tolerability.

Read the detailed description

Schizophrenia affects approximately 0.3-1.4% of the Indian population and is associated with a life expectancy reduced by up to 20 years, largely due to cardiovascular disease. Roughly one in three patients has metabolic syndrome, a risk substantially increased by second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Existing pharmacological options (metformin, topiramate, aripiprazole) offer only modest to minimal benefit, and major GLP-1 receptor agonist trials have excluded people with severe mental illness.

This is a multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial. 600 clinically stable adults with schizophrenia (ICD-11) and metabolic syndrome (NCEP ATP III), on an SGA for over six months, will be randomised 1:1 to adjunctive oral semaglutide 3 mg once daily or matching placebo, both added to treatment as usual (TAU). Dosing is titrated from a low starting dose to 3 mg/day. Central computer-generated block randomisation stratified by centre is used, with allocation concealment by sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE). Assessments occur at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks, with weekly telephonic safety follow-up. The primary endpoint is change in QRISK3 at 24 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia Disorder
  • Metabolic Syndrome
  • Antipsychotic-induced Weight Gain
  • Cardiovascular Risk
  • Insulin Resistance

Keywords

  • Semaglutide
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • QRISK3
  • Cardiometabolic risk
  • Schizophrenia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed schizophrenia (ICD-11) on a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) for more than 6 months.

    • Metabolic syndrome per NCEP ATP III definition.
    • Aged above 25 years, any gender.
    • Patient / Legally Authorised Representative (LAR) provides voluntary written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ● On clozapine, aripiprazole, or a combination of SGAs.

    • Any contraindication to semaglutide.
    • Comorbid severe psychiatric, medical or neurological disorder.
    • History of organicity or significant head injury.
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Semaglutide

    Drug: Semaglutide - oral tablet 3 mg once daily in the morning (titrated up from a low starting dose over 5 days), added to ongoing second-generation antipsychotic (TAU), for 24 weeks.

    Drug: Semaglutide + TAU

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo - matching oral tablet once daily in the morning, added to ongoing second-generation antipsychotic (TAU), for 24 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo + TAU

Interventions

  • DrugSemaglutide + TAU

    Semaglutide - oral tablet 3 mg once daily in the morning (titrated up from a low starting dose over 5 days), added to ongoing second-generation antipsychotic (TAU), for 24 weeks.

  • DrugPlacebo + TAU

    Placebo - matching oral tablet once daily in the morning, added to ongoing second-generation antipsychotic (TAU), for 24 weeks

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in QRISK3 (QResearch Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Algorithm Version 3),10-year cardiovascular risk score

    QRISK3 is a cardiovascular risk prediction tool that calculates the 10-year absolute risk of developing cardiovascular disease (heart attack or stroke). The scale produces a percentage score ranging from 0% to 100%, where 0% represents minimum cardiovascular risk and 100% represents maximum theoretical risk. Risk stratification is typically classified as: \<5% = low risk, 5-10% = intermediate risk, 10-20% = high risk, and \>20% = very high risk. A score of \>20% (or approaching 100%) represents the worst clinical situation, indicating substantially elevated 10-year cardiovascular disease risk requiring intensive preventive interventions, including lifestyle modification and pharmacological treatment (statins, antihypertensives). QRISK3 incorporates clinical variables (age, blood pressure, cholesterol), demographic factors, and comorbidities to stratify risk and guide evidence-based prevention strategies in primary care settings.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in LDL/HDL ratio

    Change from baseline in lipid ratio from fasting lipid profile

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  2. Change in insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)

    Change in HOMA-IR from fasting glucose and serum insulin

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  3. Change in high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP)

    Change in hs-CRP measured by ELISA

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  4. Change Waist circumference

    Anthropometric change from baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  5. Change in Leptin/Adiponectin ratio

    Change in metabolic biomarker measured by ELISA

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  6. Change in PANSS score

    Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (psychiatric safety), The assessment instrument employs a standardized scoring mechanism with a theoretical range spanning from a minimum of 30 to a maximum of 210 points. This metric demonstrates an inverse relationship between numerical score and outcome favorability; therefore, higher scores are indicative of more severe or unfavorable conditions, whereas lower scores denote relatively improved or more favorable circumstances. Consequently, respondents achieving scores proximate to the minimum threshold (30) represent optimal outcomes, while those obtaining scores approaching the maximum threshold (210) signify substantially compromised or critical situations requiring immediate clinical or interventional consideration.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  7. Change in CGI-SCH score

    The CGI-SCH is a clinician-rated assessment scale measuring overall severity of schizophrenia symptoms. The scale ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 represents "normal, not at all ill" (minimum score) and 7 represents "among the most extremely ill" (maximum score). Scores are interpreted as: 1-2 = normal to borderline, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = most extremely ill. A score of 7 indicates the worst clinical situation, reflecting severe and pervasive psychotic symptoms with significant functional impairment. The CGI-SCH is widely used in clinical trials and practice to track global severity and treatment response in schizophrenia over time.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  8. Change in WHO QOL-BREF

    The WHO QOL-BREF is a 26-item self-report instrument measuring overall quality of life across four domains: Physical Health, Psychological Health, Social Relationships, and Environment. Each item is rated on a 1-5 scale, yielding a minimum total score of 26 (poorest quality of life) and a maximum total score of 130 (best quality of life). Unlike severity scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life, while lower scores indicate poorer quality of life. A score of 26 represents the worst clinical situation, reflecting severely compromised physical health, psychological distress, social isolation, and inadequate environmental resources. Domain scores range from 4-20 each and can be analyzed separately to identify specific areas of impairment. The WHO QOL-BREF is widely used in clinical practice and research to evaluate functional quality of life, treatment outcomes, and overall well-being in various populations.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  9. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE)

    Frequency and severity of TEAEs; safety and tolerability

    Time frame: Continuous, weekly to Week 24

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Bak M, Fransen A, Janssen J, van Os J, Drukker M. Almost all antipsychotics result in weight gain: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 24;9(4):e94112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094112. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24763306 ↗
  • Allison DB, Mentore JL, Heo M, Chandler LP, Cappelleri JC, Infante MC, Weiden PJ. Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a comprehensive research synthesis. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;156(11):1686-96. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.11.1686. PubMed 10553730 ↗
  • Walss-Bass C, Weintraub ST, Hatch J, Mintz J, Chaudhuri AR. Clozapine causes oxidation of proteins involved in energy metabolism: a possible mechanism for antipsychotic-induced metabolic alterations. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;11(8):1097-104. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708008882. Epub 2008 May 9. PubMed 18466668 ↗
  • Rummel-Kluge C, Komossa K, Schwarz S, Hunger H, Schmid F, Lobos CA, Kissling W, Davis JM, Leucht S. Head-to-head comparisons of metabolic side effects of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2010 Nov;123(2-3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 7. PubMed 20692814 ↗
  • Mitchell AJ, Vancampfort D, Sweers K, van Winkel R, Yu W, De Hert M. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic abnormalities in schizophrenia and related disorders--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2013 Mar;39(2):306-18. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr148. Epub 2011 Dec 29. PubMed 22207632 ↗
  • Saha S, Chant D, McGrath J. A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia: is the differential mortality gap worsening over time? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1123-31. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1123. PubMed 17909124 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — dataset access restricted to the PI and authorised research team; sharing per ICMR and institutional polic

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07770282
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
Collaborators
Indian Council of Medical Research
Responsible party
Dr. Debadatta Mohapatra (Associate Professor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Debadatta Mohapatra, MD
Contact
psych_debadatta@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in
+91 9437658251

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion