ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07504250HAM-DCRUpdated Mar 31, 2026

Hyaluronic Acid vs Mitomycin-C in External Dacryocystorhinostomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) and Mitomycin -C in Dacryocystitis, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RCT to compare the surgical success in patients undergoing external dacryocystorhinostomy with intraoperative Mitomycin-C (0.4 mg/ml) Vs Hyaluronic acid 1% (1ml) as adjuvant, To compare the complication rates and wound healing patterns in each group, To Compare change in tear MMP-9 levels from preoperative (within 1 week before surgery) to postoperative (6 weeks after surgery) , To compare the comfort levels of patients in each group.

Read the detailed description

Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the standard procedure for nasolacrimal duct obstruction achieving a success rate ranging between 80-95%, aimed at restoring tear drainage by creating a direct passage between the lacrimal sac and middle meatus of the nasal cavity (1). However, postoperative failure due to fibrosis and ostium closure due to excessive fibroblast proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition, remains a major concern (2). To counteract fibrosis, various adjuncts such as Mitomycin-C (MMC) and Hyaluronic Acid (HA) have been used. Mitomycin-C was discovered from the cultures of Streptomyces caespitosus. It is an alkylating drug that inhibits DNA from being transcribed into RNA by creating cross-links within DNA strand, thus inhibiting the protein synthesis; primarily useful as a chemotherapeutic drug. It can also inhibit fibroblast proliferation, thus paving its way as an anti-adhesive in various surgeries in ophthalmology such as strabismus surgery, pterygium surgery, trabeculectomy, DCR, corneal refractive surgeries, etc. Mitomycin-C (0.4 mg/ml) soaked in gelfoam is applied at the ostium site for 2 minutes and then thoroughly irrigated with normal saline in DCR as it can lead to punctal or canalicular stenosis, conjunctival thinning, delayed wound healing, excessive nasal crusting or synaechiae (3). Systemic absorption causing myelosuppression, mucositis, hepatorenal toxicity can also occur if not irrigated thoroughly.

Hyaluronic Acid is a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) polysaccharide which is a naturally occurring chemical which is the main component of extracellular matrix. It is found in skin, connective tissue, synovium, umbilical cord and vitreous humor. Hyaluronic acid activates CD 44 mediated Rho/ MAPK/ PI3K signaling pathways, promoting controlled epithelial migration, proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition. Hyaluronic acid maintains a moist extracellular environment, promoting epithelial migration and mucosal regeneration over raw bone and granulation tissue. It enhances cilia recovery and muco-ciliary clearance in the nasal cavity.

Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), also known as Gelatinase B, is a zinc- and calcium-dependent enzyme that degrades components of the extracellular matrix, particularly type IV collagen of the basement membrane. It is secreted as an inactive pro-enzyme by fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and inflammatory cells and becomes activated by proteolytic cleavage. MMP-9 facilitates cell migration, angiogenesis and tissue remodeling during normal wound healing. However, excessive or prolonged activity leads to excess matrix breakdown, chronic inflammation and fibrosis, especially when the balance between MMP-9 and its inhibitor TIMP-1 is disrupted. In DCR surgery, optimal MMP-9 activity supports mucosal healing, while overexpression promotes granulation and ostium closure. Hence, tear MMP-9 levels serve as an indicator of postoperative healing and fibrosis modulation.

Since tear fluid reflects local ocular surface and lacrimal system changes, evaluating MMP-9 levels before and after DCR provides an objective measure of fibrosis modulation (4). This study aims to compare the surgical success rates of DCR when using intraoperative MMC versus HA, along with evaluating their effects on tear MMP-9 levels.

GAPS IN CURRENT LITERATURE:

While multiple studies have examined the roles of Mitomycin-C (MMC) and Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in DCR to minimize postoperative fibrosis and ostium blockage, the available data is still sparse and varies widely across reports. Both MMC and HA have individually been studied for their anti-fibrotic effects in DCR. To date, there is a lack of controlled study that provides a direct comparison between the two agents. Also, most studies have focused primarily on anatomical and functional success rates without assessing the underlying molecular mechanisms of wound healing. There is a paucity of data evaluating objective biochemical markers such as Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) or Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases (TIMPs) to quantify the degree of fibrosis or inflammation following DCR. Hence, there is a significant gap in evidence regarding the relative efficacy and safety of MMC versus HA in preventing post-operative fibrosis and ostium closure following DCR surgery.

Objectives:

Primary objective:

To compare the surgical success in patients undergoing external dacryocystorhinostomy with intraoperative Mitomycin-C (0.4 mg/ml) Vs Hyaluronic acid 1% (1ml) as adjuvant

Secondary objectives:

  1. To compare the complication rates and wound healing patterns in each group
  2. Change in tear MMP-9 levels from preoperative (within 1 week before surgery) to postoperative (6 weeks after surgery)
  3. To compare the comfort levels of patients in each group
02

Conditions studied

  • Dacryocystitis

Keywords

  • Dacryocystitis
  • dacryocystorhinostomy
  • mitomycin C
  • hyaluronic acid
03

In context

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. All patients within age group 18-65 years diagnosed with chronic dacryocystitis due to Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (PANDO) qualifying for external dacryocystorhinostomy
  2. Patients with resolved acute dacryocystitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute dacryocystitis/ Lacrimal sac abscess
  2. Secondary NLDO conditions such as infections, inflammatory, traumatic, malignant, etc.
  3. Failed/ recurrent/ revision dacryocystorhinostomy and previous dacryocystectomy
  4. Presence of systemic diseases affecting wound healing (eg: uncontrolled diabetes, conditions, etc.)
  5. Use of topical or systemic / within 1 month prior to surgery
  6. Pregnant or lactating women
  7. Known allergy or to MMC or HA.
  8. Inadequate tear volume for biomarker analysis or poor sample quality.
  9. Intraoperative flap complications/ excessive bleeding
  10. Blood stained discharge or bloody regurgitation
  11. Cervical or generalized lymphadenopathy
  12. Dry eyes
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A - Hyaluronic Acid

    Hyaluronic Acid

    Drug: Hyaluronic Acid (HA)

  • Active comparator
    Group B - Mitomycin-C

    Mitomycin-C

    Drug: Mitomycin -C

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1. Lacrimal irrigation test 2. diagnostic probing

    1. Lacrimal irrigation test 2. diagnostic probing

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. MMP-9 levels using ELISA

    MMP-9 levels using ELISA

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Patient Satisfaction Scale (Visual Analog Scale)

    Patient Satisfaction Scale (Visual Analog Scale) minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10 best outcome : score 0 worst outcome: score 10

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To maintain confidentiality of the participants.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07504250
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
Responsible party
Sandip Kumar Sahu (Associate Professor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 31, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Sandip K Sahu, MS
Contact
ophthal_sandip@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in
+917978243970
Pavithra S, MBBS
Contact
pavithras0587@gmail.com
Sandip K Sahu, MS
principal investigator · AIIMS Bhubaneswar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Hyaluronic Acid

Start the discussion