ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07755137CBT-DAYUpdated Aug 10, 2026

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth in Clinical Settings

An interventional study of CBT-DAY (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth) and Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) in Autism Spectrum Disorder, Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders, sponsored by Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Primary conditionAutistic DisorderRegistry: Autism Spectrum DisorderReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Autism Spectrum Disorder — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Autistic Disorder
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Autistic Disorder, a narrower term within Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
11 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth (CBT-DAY) can improve depressive symptoms and related mechanisms in autistic youth aged 11-17 years with depression receiving care in outpatient clinical settings.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does CBT-DAY lead to greater reductions in depressive symptom severity compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU)?
  • Does CBT-DAY improve key mechanisms (emotional reactivity, self-esteem, and autism self-knowledge) associated with depression outcomes?

Researchers will compare CBT-DAY versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) to see if CBT-DAY results in greater improvements in depressive symptoms and related outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Complete baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up assessments (surveys and interviews)
  • Be randomly assigned to receive either 12 weeks of CBT-DAY or treatment-as-usual
  • Participate in therapy sessions during the 12-week intervention period
  • Complete follow-up assessments three months after treatment to evaluate longer-term outcomes
02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Depressive Disorder
  • Anxiety Disorders

Keywords

  • depression
  • autism
  • youth
  • anxiety
  • cognitive behavioral therapy
03

In context

Autistic Disorder Reclassified

1,030 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 49 across 811 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 152 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Compared within Autistic Disorder, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Autism Spectrum Disorder. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Autistic youth:

  • Age 11 to 17 years
  • Prior clinical diagnosis of autism (per record review)
  • At least a fifth grade reading level
  • An ability to engage in sessions verbally (i.e., full length sentences)
  • Elevated symptoms of depression at baseline (RCADS)
  • Depression is a current clinical concern and participant is appropriate for intervention (per investigator determination)
  • At least one parent/caregiver willing and able to participate
  • Eligible to receive services at CHLA
  • If taking psychotropic medication, regimen must be stable for at least 8 weeks prior to baseline

Parents/Caregivers:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Parent or legal guardian of participating youth
  • Able to provide
  • Comfortable reading, writing, or speaking English or Spanish
  • Willing to participate in study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Autistic youth:

  • Lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, or intellectual disability
  • Severe suicidal or homicidal ideation or self-injury requiring immediate higher-level care
  • Currently receiving psychotherapy for depression
  • Changes in psychotropic medication regimen during study participation (participants may be withdrawn)
  • A reading level below fifth-grade
  • An inability to engage in sessions verbally (i.e., nonverbal, minimally verbal)

Parents/Caregivers:

  • Not the parent or legal guardian of the participating youth
  • Unable to provide
  • Not comfortable reading, writing, or speaking English or Spanish
  • Unwilling to participate in study procedures
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CBT-DAY (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth)

    Participants receive a structured, 12-week Cognitive Behavioral Therapy program adapted for autistic youth, targeting depressive symptoms and underlying mechanisms such as emotional reactivity and self-esteem. Therapy is delivered by trained clinicians with weekly sessions and includes assessments at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up.

    Behavioral: CBT-DAY (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth)

  • Active comparator
    Treatment-as-Usual (TAU)

    Participants receive standard outpatient mental health care, typically consisting of supportive, talk-based therapy provided by clinicians without CBT-DAY training. Participants complete the same assessment schedule as the experimental arm across baseline, treatment, and follow-up timepoints.

    Behavioral: Treatment-as-Usual (TAU)

Interventions

  • BehavioralCBT-DAY (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth)

    CBT-DAY (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth) is a 12-week, autism-adapted cognitive behavioral therapy designed for verbally fluent autistic youth aged 11-17 to reduce depressive symptoms. The intervention targets key mechanisms-emotional reactivity, negative self-esteem, and autism self-knowledge-using developmentally tailored CBT strategies appropriate for autistic individuals.

  • BehavioralTreatment-as-Usual (TAU)

    Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) consists of standard clinical care delivered by clinicians with limited autism training in the same outpatient setting. It typically involves supportive, talk-based psychotherapy without the structured, autism-adapted components of CBT-DAY.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in depressive symptom severity

    Change in depressive symptom severity as assessed by the Modified Depression Module of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS). This is a semi-structured clinical interview evaluating DSM-5 depressive symptoms over the previous 2 weeks. Each symptom is rated on a 6-point scale (1 = not present to 6 = severe). Higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The outcome will be evaluated as change in total depression severity scores over time and compared between CBT-DAY and TAU groups. The KSADS will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Anxiety Symptoms

    Change in anxiety symptom severity as assessed by the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale adapted for Autism Spectrum Disorder (PARS-ASD). This is a semi-structured clinical interview assessing type and severity of anxiety symptoms. Each symptom is rated on a 6 point scale (0 = never to 5 = always). Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms. The outcome will be evaluated as change in anxiety scores over time and compared between CBT DAY and TAU groups. The PARS-ASD will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

  2. Change in Suicidal Ideation

    Change in severity of suicidal ideation measured by the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-Jr). This is a youth-report survey evaluating dfrequency of suicidal thoughts over the previous 2 weeks. Items are rated on a 7-point scale (0 = never to 6 = almost every day), with higher total scores indicating more severe suicidal ideation. The outcome will be evaluated as change in suicidal ideation scores over time and compared between CBT DAY and TAU groups. The SIQ-Jr will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

  3. Change in Life Satisfaction

    Change in youth-reported life satisfaction measured using the PROMIS Pediatric Short Form - Life Satisfaction. This is a youth-report survey evaluating satisfaction with life over the past month. Items are rated on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction. The outcome will be evaluated as change in life satisfaction over time and compared between CBT DAY and TAU groups. The PROMIS will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

  4. Change in Emotional Reactivity

    Change in emotional reactivity as assessed by the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI). This is a youth- and parent-report survey evaluating emotion dysregulation in youth. Each symptom is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all to 4 = very severe). Higher scores indicate greater emotion dysregulation. The outcome will be evaluated as change in emotional dysregulation over time and compared between CBT DAY and TAU groups. The EDI will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

  5. Change in Self-Esteem

    Change in self-esteem as assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). This is a youth-report survey evaluating self-esteem. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher self-esteem. The outcome will be evaluated as change in self-esteem scores over time and compared between CBT DAY and TAU groups. The RSES will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

  6. Change in Autism Self-Knowledge

    Change in autism self-knowledge as assessed by the Autism Personal and Community Identity (APCI) scale. This is a youth-report survey evaluating autism self-knowledge. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale (1 = strong disagree to 6 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher autism self-knowledge. The outcome will be evaluated as change in autism self-knowledge over time and compared between CBT DAY and TAU groups. The APCI will be administered four times from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07755137
Responsible party
Jessica Schwartzman (Director, Training and Research to Empower NeuroDiversity (TREND) Lab, CHLA, Children's Hospital Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jessica Schwartzman, PhD
Contact
trendlab@chla.usc.edu
323-207-5910
Jessica Schwartzman, PhD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion