ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07751965MARVELTAVIUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Myval TAVR Safety and Effectiveness in High-risk Severe AR

An interventional study of Myval THV series in Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Disease and Calcified Aortic Valve, sponsored by Ceric Sàrl. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Ceric Sàrl · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
164
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Myval THV series in patients with severe symptomatic non- or mild-calcified aortic regurgitation.

Read the detailed description

Severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) in high-risk or inoperable patients with non- or mildly calcified valves has limited treatment options. While TAVR has emerged as a viable approach in aortic stenosis, its use in aortic regurgitation remains limited due to anatomical complexities, the absence of dedicated devices, and the prevalence of large annular dimensions in these patients.Dedicated devices like the JenaValve Trilogy™ demonstrated safety and efficacy in trials such as ALIGN-AR and JUPITER registry, but use is restricted by annular size limitations.Additionally, The PANTHEON International Project demonstrated safety and efficacy of balloon and self-expandable valves in severe AR patients. Despite improved THV platforms and techniques, TAVR for pure native aortic valve regurgitation remains a challenging procedure, with significant risk for transcatheter valve embolization or migration (TVEM).The Myval THV series offers a broader size range from 20mm-35mm and allows for controlled oversizing, as demonstrated in a large international registry showing high technical success and favorable 1-year outcomes in patients with non-calcified AR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Regurgitation
  • Aortic Disease
  • Calcified Aortic Valve
03

In context

Aortic Valve Insufficiency

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Insufficiency; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 164 is above the median of 123 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Insufficiency.

Browse Aortic Valve Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Ceric Sàrl is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient above 18 years of age.
  2. Patients must have co-morbidities such that the heart team and Investigator concur that the predicted risk of operative mortality is high.
  3. Patient has non- or mild-calcified aortic regurgitation, undergoing TAVI with Myval THV Series without any degree stenosis, and severe aortic regurgitation as per investigator/ Heart team discretion according to (at least one) imaging criteria that can include:

    1. Echocardiographically derived criteria: regurgitant volume ≥60 ml/beat, regurgitant fraction ≥50%, effective regurgitant orifice ≥0.3cm2, holodiastolic flow reversal at the level of the mid-descending aorta with an end diastolic flow velocity greater than 20 cm/s, width of vena contracta ≥6mm, hemi pressure time \<200 msec, or vena contracta area assessed with 3D echo ≥0.4 cm².

      AND/OR

    2. Cardiac magnetic resonance derived criteria: Regurgitant fraction >40% or regurgitant volume >60mL.
  4. Patient suitable for implantation with Myval THV series via transfemoral approach.
  5. Patient is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve regurgitation, as demonstrated by the (NYHA) Functional Class ≥II.
  6. Patient or the patient's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site.
  7. The patient and the treating physician agree that the patient will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are not willing to provide form, or whose legal heirs object to participate in the study
  2. Pregnant and lactating female patients
  3. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤1 month before the intended treatment
  4. Mixed aortic valve disease
  5. Moderate-severe calcification of aortic valve
  6. Bicuspid aortic valve disease according to treating physician (if detected by the corelab it will not be excluded except if so considered by the steering committee)
  7. Congenital unicuspid patients
  8. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure performed within 30 days of the index procedure, (or 6 months if the procedure was a drug eluting coronary stent/scaffold implantation).
  9. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position, prosthetic ring, severe mitral annular calcification (MAC), severe (greater than 3+) mitral insufficiency, or Gorlin syndrome.
  10. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC\<3000 mm3), acute anemia (\<9 mg/dl), thrombocytopenia ( count \<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  11. Untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
  12. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance.
  13. Need for emergency surgery other than aortic valve replacement with the study device.
  14. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction (HOCM).
  15. Very severe ventricular dysfunction with (LVEF) \<15%.
  16. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  17. Active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior 3 months.
  18. A known or to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), or clopidogrel (Plavix), or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately premedicated.
  19. Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a (TIA).
  20. Renal insufficiency and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis
  21. \<1 year due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
  22. Significant aortic disease, including abdominal aortic or thoracic aneurysm defined as maximal luminal diameter 5cm or greater; marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma or narrowing (especially with calcification and surface irregularities) of the abdominal or thoracic aorta, severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta (applicable for transfemoral patients only) which would make Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) unfeasible as per the Investigator/Heart Team.
  23. Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of introducer sheath such as severe obstructive calcification, severe tortuosity or vessels with adequate femoral size (applicable for transfemoral patients only).
  24. Currently participating in an drug or another device study which has not achieved the primary endpoint.
  25. Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections.
  26. Any condition, which in the Investigator's opinion, would preclude safe participation of patient in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
164 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Single Arm

    All patients with severe symptomatic non- or mild-calcified aortic regurgitation undergoing TAVR using Myval THV series in high surgical risk based on investigator/Heart team discretion who meet study eligibility criteria.

    Device: Myval THV series

Interventions

  • DeviceMyval THV series

    All patients with severe symptomatic non- or mild-calcified aortic regurgitation undergoing TAVR using Myval THV series in high surgical risk based on investigator/Heart team discretion who meet study eligibility criteria.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All cause mortality

    Death due to any cause occurring during the specified follow-up period.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. All Stroke

    Any ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by clinical evaluation and/or appropriate imaging during follow-up.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Bleeding (Type 3 & 4)

    Major bleeding events classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 3 or Type 4.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Major vascular complications

    Major vascular access- or procedure-related complications as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria.

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Acute Kidney Injury (Stage 3 and 4)

    Acute kidney injury meeting Stage 3 or Stage 4 severity according to the applicable VARC/AKI classification criteria.

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Surgery/Intervention related to device

    Any unplanned surgical or catheter-based intervention performed to correct or treat a device-related complication.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Conduction system disturbances resulting in a new permanent pacemaker implantation

    New conduction abnormalities requiring implantation of a permanent pacemaker after the index procedure.

    Time frame: 30 days

  8. Greater than or equal to Moderate Paravalvular Regurgitation

    Presence of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation as determined by echocardiographic assessment during follow-up.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. All cause mortality

    Death due to any cause occurring during the specified follow-up period.

    Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years

  2. All Stroke

    Any ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by clinical evaluation and/or appropriate imaging during follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 years, 3 years and 5 years

  3. Bleeding (Type 3 & 4)

    Major bleeding events classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 3 or Type 4.

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  4. Surgery/Intervention related to device

    Any unplanned surgical or catheter-based intervention performed to correct or treat a device-related complication.

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  5. Conduction system disturbances resulting in a new permanent pacemaker implantation

    New conduction abnormalities requiring implantation of a permanent pacemaker after the index procedure and during follow up

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  6. Re-hospitalization for procedure-related or valve-related causes

    Any unplanned hospital admission due to complications related to the index procedure or the implanted valve during the follow-up period.

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  7. NYHA functional improvement

    Improvement or change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline during the follow-up period.

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  8. Residual aortic regurgitation ≤ mild

    Presence of none/trace or mild residual aortic regurgitation as assessed by echocardiography during follow-up.

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  9. Six-minute walk test

    Change in functional exercise capacity measured by the distance walked during the standardized six-minute walk test (6MWT).

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  10. Evidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and bioprosthetic valve failure

    Occurrence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction or bioprosthetic valve failure as assessed according to established VARC-3 criteria during the follow-up period.

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 year and 5 year

  11. Bioprosthetic valve deterioration

    Occurrence of bioprosthetic valve deterioration, including structural valve deterioration, as assessed according to established VARC-3 criteria during the follow-up period.

    Time frame: 1 year

  12. Length of index hospital stay

    Number of days spent in hospital

    Time frame: From procedure up to discharge, assessed until 2-3 days post procedure

  13. Improved KCCQ from baseline

    This is a Quality of Life questionnaire which includes Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), where usually improvement from baseline is calculated , not simply the absolute score. Higher KCCQ score means better quality of life and Lower KCCQ score means lower quality of life

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  14. Improved EQ-5D from baseline

    The EQ-5D (EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire) is another standard patient-reported outcome (PRO) used in TAVI studies. This is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument that allows comparisons across different diseases and is frequently used for health economic analyses. Similar to that KCCQ, here as well higher the score, better the quality of life and vice versa for lower score.

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  15. Improved valve function

    Percentage of patients with none/trace, mild, or less aortic regurgitation on echocardiographic assessment during follow-up (responder analysis).

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years

  16. Technical success at exit from procedure

    Successful implantation and function of the study device without procedural mortality, need for surgery or intervention related to the device, or device malfunction at exit from the procedure, as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

    Time frame: 30 days

  17. Device Success

    Successful implantation and intended performance of the study device without procedural mortality, as assessed according to VARC-3 criteria.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shelkey M, Wallace M. Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Director. 2000 Spring;8(2):72-3. No abstract available. PubMed 11081028 ↗
  • Corrigendum to: 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2022 Jun 1;43(21):2022. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac051. No abstract available. PubMed 35188539 ↗
  • ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. No abstract available. PubMed 12091180 ↗
  • De Backer O, Pilgrim T, Simonato M, Mackensen GB, Fiorina C, Veulemanns V, Cerillo A, Schofer J, Amabile N, Achkouty G, Schafer U, Deutsch MA, Sinning JM, Rahman MS, Sawaya FJ, Hildick-Smith D, Hernandez JM, Kim WK, Lefevre T, Seiffert M, Bleiziffer S, Petronio AS, Van Mieghem N, Taramasso M, Sondergaard L, Windecker S, Latib A, Dvir D. Usefulness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Treatment of Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;122(6):1028-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.044. Epub 2018 Jun 27. PubMed 30072124 ↗
  • Sawaya FJ, Deutsch MA, Seiffert M, Yoon SH, Codner P, Wickramarachchi U, Latib A, Petronio AS, Rodes-Cabau J, Taramasso M, Spaziano M, Bosmans J, Biasco L, Mylotte D, Savontaus M, Gheeraert P, Chan J, Jorgensen TH, Sievert H, Mocetti M, Lefevre T, Maisano F, Mangieri A, Hildick-Smith D, Kornowski R, Makkar R, Bleiziffer S, Sondergaard L, De Backer O. Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Treatment of Pure Aortic Regurgitation in Native Valves and Failing Surgical Bioprostheses: Results From an International Registry Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 22;10(10):1048-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.004. PubMed 28521923 ↗
  • Yoon SH, Schmidt T, Bleiziffer S, Schofer N, Fiorina C, Munoz-Garcia AJ, Yzeiraj E, Amat-Santos IJ, Tchetche D, Jung C, Fujita B, Mangieri A, Deutsch MA, Ubben T, Deuschl F, Kuwata S, De Biase C, Williams T, Dhoble A, Kim WK, Ferrari E, Barbanti M, Vollema EM, Miceli A, Giannini C, Attizzani GF, Kong WKF, Gutierrez-Ibanes E, Jimenez Diaz VA, Wijeysundera HC, Kaneko H, Chakravarty T, Makar M, Sievert H, Hengstenberg C, Prendergast BD, Vincent F, Abdel-Wahab M, Nombela-Franco L, Silaschi M, Tarantini G, Butter C, Ensminger SM, Hildick-Smith D, Petronio AS, Yin WH, De Marco F, Testa L, Van Mieghem NM, Whisenant BK, Kuck KH, Colombo A, Kar S, Moris C, Delgado V, Maisano F, Nietlispach F, Mack MJ, Schofer J, Schaefer U, Bax JJ, Frerker C, Latib A, Makkar RR. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 5;70(22):2752-2763. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.006. PubMed 29191323 ↗
  • Elkoumy A, Jose J, Gunasekaran S, Kumar A, Srinivas BC, Manjunath CN, Ravindranath KS, Parekh M, Chandra P, Kapoor R, Abdelshafy M, Seth A, Agrawal P, Mathur A, Rao RS, Elzomor H, Sadanada KS, Kumar V, Arsang-Jang S, Mehrotra S, Raghuraman B, Khanolkar U, Premchand RK, Chopra M, Krishna P, Mehta H, Gupta R, Kumar V, Senguttuvan NB, Baumbach A, Serruys PW, Soliman O. Angiographic quantification of aortic regurgitation following myval octacor implantation; independent core lab adjudication. Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;382:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Apr 5. PubMed 37028710 ↗
  • Poletti E, De Backer O, Scotti A, Costa G, Bruno F, Fiorina C, Buzzatti N, Latini A, Rudolph TK, van den Dorpel MMP, Brinkmann C, Patel KP, Panoulas V, Schofer J, Giordano A, Barbanti M, Regazzoli D, Taramasso M, Saia F, Baumbach A, Maisano F, Van Mieghem NM, Sondergaard L, Latib A, Amat Santos IJ, Bedogni F, Testa L. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation: The PANTHEON International Project. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug 28;16(16):1974-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.026. PubMed 37648345 ↗
  • Silaschi M, Conradi L, Wendler O, Schlingloff F, Kappert U, Rastan AJ, Baumbach H, Holzhey D, Eichinger W, Bader R, Treede H. The JUPITER registry: One-year outcomes of transapical aortic valve implantation using a second generation transcatheter heart valve for aortic regurgitation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;91(7):1345-1351. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27370. Epub 2017 Nov 24. PubMed 29171730 ↗
  • Rawasia WF, Khan MS, Usman MS, Siddiqi TJ, Mujeeb FA, Chundrigar M, Kalra A, Alkhouli M, Kavinsky CJ, Bhatt DL. Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for native aortic valve regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):345-353. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27840. Epub 2018 Sep 30. PubMed 30269437 ↗
  • Markham R, Ghodsian M, Sharma R. TAVR in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation: Ready to Use? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jul 28;22(9):98. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01338-6. PubMed 32725310 ↗
  • Siani A, Perone F, Costantini P, Rodolfi S, Muscogiuri G, Sironi S, Carriero S, Pavon AG, van der Bilt I, van Rosendael P, Broekhuizen L, Teske A, Cramer MJ, Guglielmo M. Aortic regurgitation: A multimodality approach. J Clin Ultrasound. 2022 Oct;50(8):1041-1050. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23299. PubMed 36218214 ↗
  • Makkar RR, Thourani VH, Vahl TP, Yadav PK, McCabe JM, George I, Satler L, Chetcuti S, Daniels DV, Waggoner T, Whisenant B, Russo M, Summers M, Garcia S, Frisoli T, Ramana RK, Stinis C, Golwala H, Zahr F, Greenbaum A, Rovin J, Sanchez C, Szerlip M, Deeb GM, Amoroso N, Patel D, Fahy M, Ranard LS, Gupta A, Chakravarty T, Skaf S, Chuang M, Kodali SK, Figulla HR, Treede H, Baldus S, Pinto DS, Leon MB; ALIGN-AR Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Trilogy valve for symptomatic native aortic regurgitation (ALIGN-AR): a pivotal, multicentre, single-arm, investigational device exemption study. Lancet. 2025 Dec 13;406(10521):2757-2771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02215-9. Epub 2025 Nov 16. PubMed 41260228 ↗
  • Sanchez-Luna JP, Martin P, Dager AE, Charry PD, Beltran JR, Sanchez-Recalde A, Giannini F, Gomez-Menchero A, Pan M, Ielasi A, Monastyrski A, Barbanti M, Fernandez-Aviles F, Ancona MB, Mussayev A, De Brahi JP, Lamelas P, Sanchez-Perez A, Garcia Puerta M, Ortiz M, Gonzalez-Gutierrez JC, Marengo G, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Bartol E, Stepanenko A, Gomez-Salvador I, San Roman JA, Amat-Santos IJ. Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation. EuroIntervention. 2023 Sep 18;19(7):580-588. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344. PubMed 37565470 ↗
  • Koren O, Patel V, Naami R, Naami E, Nagasaka T, Shechter A, Natanzon SS, Kohan S, Allison Z, Lerner A, Cheng DE, Chakravarty T, Nakamura M, Cheng W, Jilaihawi H, Makkar RR. New adverse coronary events in valve-in-valve TAVR and native TAVR-A 2-year matched cohort. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 21;9:1004103. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1004103. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36211543 ↗
  • VARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE; Genereux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799. PubMed 33871579 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.

Of 44 interventional studies with no phase under Aortic Valve Insufficiency, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 74. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 22, 2026
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 30, 2032
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07751965
Lead sponsor
Ceric Sàrl
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Start date
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 30, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Phani Kondamudi
Contact
pkondamudi@cerc-europe.org
+33 (0)6 60 05 55 12
Ignacio Amat Santos
principal investigator · Hospital Clínico UniversHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion