ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06861361START YOUNGUpdated May 12, 2026

Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in YOUNG Patients

An interventional study of Myval balloon-expandable THV Series and Surgical bioprosthetic valve in Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis, sponsored by Ceric Sàrl. Recruiting at 49 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by Ceric Sàrl · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study objective is to demonstrate that the clinical outcomes of the Myval balloon-expandable THV series are non-inferior to those of SAVR in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis aged 65 to 75 years.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, open label, trial of 1180 patients treated with surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,180 is above the median of 126 across 554 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ceric Sàrl is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participant will be included if all the following criteria are met:

  1. Patients aged ≥65 and ≤75
  2. Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient≥40mmHg, and or peak velocity>4m/sec).
  3. Patients with symptomatic heart disease due to severe native calcific aortic stenosis, as judged by a multidisciplinary heart team (including a cardiac surgeon), for whom SAVR or transfemoral TAVR is deemed feasible and approved by the local heart team.Signed for participation in the clinical investigation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participant will not be included if any one of the following conditions exists:

  1. Unable to understand and follow clinical investigation-related instructions or unable to comply with the clinical investigation protocol
  2. less than 1 year
  3. Known or allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel or any Device frame components.
  4. Under judicial protection, tutorship, or curatorship
  5. Participation in another trial before the primary endpoint
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TAVR: Myval balloon-expandable THV Series

    Myval balloon-expandable THV Series will be used for valve replacement

    Device: Myval balloon-expandable THV Series

  • Active comparator
    SAVR: Any surgical bioprosthetic valve commercially available at the clinical investigation site

    Surgical bioprosthetic valve commercially available at the clinical investigation site will be used for valve replacement

    Device: Surgical bioprosthetic valve

Interventions

  • DeviceMyval balloon-expandable THV Series

    Patients receive Myval balloon-expandable THV Series (TAVR)

  • DeviceSurgical bioprosthetic valve

    Patients receive any surgical bioprosthetic valve commercially available at the clinical investigation site (SAVR)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary safety endpoint at 1 month (non-inferiority): Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, bleeding, AKI stage 2-4, rehospitalization for a procedure-related event or or reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction.

    Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, VARC-3 type 1 (only overt bleeding that requires a transfusion of 1 unit of whole blood/red blood cells (BARC 3a), type 2 and 3 bleeding, AKI stage 2-4, rehospitalization for a procedure-related event or reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  2. Primary efficacy endpoint at 1 year (non-inferiority): Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, or rehospitalization for valve related event

    Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, or rehospitalization for valve related event at 1 year (VARC-3 definition)

    Time frame: 1 year post procedure

  3. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: primary endpoint : prevalence of feasible redoTAVR or ViV TAVR without requiring leaflet modifications techniques (green cases).

    Proportion of participants classified as "green cases" (redo-TAVR or ViV-TAVR feasible without leaflet modification) based on predefined CT scan criteria, including annular dimensions, coronary access, and valve frame interactions.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: all cause mortality over time

    Number of participants who experience all-cause mortality at each follow-up time point.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

  2. Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Stroke Over Time

    Number of participants with any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) as defined by clinical assessment and imaging confirmation.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

  3. Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Bleeding Events (VARC-3 Type 1, 2, and 3) Over Time

    Number of participants experiencing bleeding events classified as VARC-3 type 1 (BARC 3a), type 2 and 3. * Scoring System: Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) scale: * 1 * Overt bleeding not requiringing surgical or percutaneous intervention, but requiring medical intervention, leading to hospitalization, an increased level of care, or medical evaluation * Overt bleeding requiring a transfusion of 1 unit of whole blood/RBC * 3 * Overt bleeding in a critical organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial or intramuscular with compartment syndrome * Overt bleeding causing hypovolemic shock or severe hypotension * Overt bleeding requiring reoperation, surgical exploration, or re-intervention for the purpose of controlling bleeding * Post-thoracotomy chest tube output ≥2 L within 24-h * Overt bleeding requiring a transfusion of ≥5 units of whole blood/RBC * Overt bleeding associated with a haemoglobin drop ≥5 g/dL * Higher scores indicate worst outcomes

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

  4. Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Stage 2-4 Over Time

    Number of participants with acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 2-4 based on VARC-3 * Scale Information: AKI from Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3): * Scoring System: * Stage 1: AKI that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: * Increase in serum creatinine ≥150-200% (≥1.5-2.0x increase) within 7 days compared with baseline * Increase of ≥ 0.3mg/dL (≥26.4 μmol/L) within 48 h of the index procedure o Stage 2: AKI that fulfils the following criterion: * Increase in serum creatinine \>200-300% (\>2.0-3.0x increase) within 7 days compared with baseline o Stage 3: AKI that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: * Increase in serum creatinine \>300% (\>3.0x increase) within 7 days compared with baseline * Serum creatinine ≥4.0 mg/dL (≥354 μmol/L) with an acute increase of ≥0.5 mg/dL (≥44 μmol/L) * Stage 4: AKI requiring new temporary or permanent renal replacement therapy * Interpretation: Higher stages indicate more severe kidney injury

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

  5. Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Rehospitalization for Procedure-Related Event Over Time

    Number of participants requiring rehospitalization due to procedure-related complications.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

  6. Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Reintervention for Aortic Valve Dysfunction Over Time

    Number of participants requiring reintervention (redo-TAVR, SAVR, or valve explantation) due to aortic valve dysfunction.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

  7. Secondary Endpoint: Feasibility of re-TAVR based on CT scan evaluation (CT scan, for selected sites only)

    Number of participants in whom redo-TAVR is deemed feasible based on CT scan evaluation. Feasibility will be assessed using predefined anatomical criteria, including: Annular dimensions Coronary access Valve frame interactions Need for leaflet modification techniques Feasibility will be categorized as: "Feasible without modification," "Feasible with modification," or "Not feasible.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  8. Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants Requiring New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI) Due to Conduction System Disturbances

    Number of participants who require a new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) within 1 month post-procedure due to conduction system disturbances (e.g., high-degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block). Indications for PPI will be based on standard clinical guidelines.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  9. Secondary Endpoint: Rate of prosthetic valve regurgitation (moderate or severe)

    Time frame: 1 year post procedure

  10. Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants with Major Vascular Complications (VARC-3 Criteria)

    Number of participants experiencing major vascular complications within 1 month post-procedure, as defined by VARC-3 criteria. o Scoring System: Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria o Definition: MAJOR vacular complication: One of the following: • Aortic dissection or aortic rupture • Vascular injury or compartment syndrome resulting in death,VARC type ≥2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment • Distal embolization (non-cerebral) from a vascular source resulting in death, amputation, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible end-organ damage • Unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention resulting in death, VARC type ≥2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment • Closure device failure resulting in death, VARC type ≥2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  11. Secondary Endpoint: Performance of the aortic valve : Gradients (mean/max) assessed by TTE

    Mean and peak aortic valve gradients (mmHg) will be measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at each follow-up time point. Values will be reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

    Time frame: 1 year and 3 years post procedure

  12. Secondary Endpoint: Performance of the aortic valve : paravalvular leakage (PVL) grade evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)

    Number of participants stratified by paravalvular leakage (PVL) grade (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe), as assessed by TTE. PVL severity will be determined based on echocardiographic parameters defined by the VARC-3 criteria.

    Time frame: 1 year and 3 years post procedure

  13. Secondary Endpoint: Performance of the aortic valve : effective orifice are (EOA) evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)

    Effective orifice area (EOA) (cm²) measured using the continuity equation on TTE. Values will be reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

    Time frame: 1 year and 3 years post procedure

  14. Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants with Structural Valve Deterioration (VARC-3) and/or Requiring Redo-TAVR or Valve Explantation

    Number of participants experiencing significant structural valve deterioration (SVD) as defined by VARC-3 criteria. SVD will be assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) Number of participants requiring redo-TAVR or surgical valve explantation within 5 years and 10 years post-procedure.

    Time frame: 5 years and 10 years post procedure

  15. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes : feasibility of redoTAVR or ViV TAVR with or without requiring leaflet modification techniques

    Proportion of participants in whom redo-TAVR or ViV-TAVR is feasible, with or without requiring leaflet modification techniques, based on CT scan evaluation. Classification will be based on predefined anatomic and hemodynamic feasibility criteria.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  16. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: prevalence of HALT in both TAVR and SAVR groups

    Number of participants with HALT detected on CT scan in both TAVR and SAVR groups. HALT will be defined as the presence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening observed on post-procedure CT imaging.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  17. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Impact of HALT on Mean Transvalvular Gradient - Valve Hemodynamics

    * Outcome Measure: Mean change in mean transvalvular gradient (mmHg) in participants with and without HALT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). * Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure * Unit of Measure: mmHg * Interpretation: A higher mean transvalvular gradient suggests increased valve obstruction.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  18. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Impact of HALT on Peak Transvalvular Gradient - Valve Hemodynamics

    * Outcome Measure: Mean change in peak transvalvular gradient (mmHg) in participants with and without HALT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). * Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure * Unit of Measure: mmHg * Interpretation: A higher peak transvalvular gradient indicates greater hemodynamic burden on the valve.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  19. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Impact of HALT on Effective Orifice Area (EOA) - Valve Hemodynamics

    * Outcome Measure: Mean change in effective orifice area (cm²) in participants with and without HALT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). * Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure * Unit of Measure: cm² * Interpretation: A lower EOA suggests impaired valve opening and increased risk of stenosis.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  20. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Mean Transvalvular Gradient - THV Hemodynamics

    * Outcome Measure: Mean transvalvular gradient (mmHg) measured by TTE post-implantation. * Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure * Unit of Measure: mmHg * Interpretation: Higher gradients indicate increased obstruction.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  21. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Peak Transvalvular Gradient - THV Hemodynamics

    * Outcome Measure: Peak transvalvular gradient (mmHg) measured by TTE post-implantation. * Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure * Unit of Measure: mmHg * Interpretation: Higher peaks indicate more severe stenosis.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  22. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Effective Orifice Area (EOA) - THV Hemodynamics

    * Outcome Measure: Effective orifice area (cm²) measured by TTE post-implantation. * Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure * Unit of Measure: cm²

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

  23. CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Commissural Alignment of THV

    Mean commissural misalignment angle (degrees) measured by CT scan to evaluate THV positioning relative to native aortic valve commissures.

    Time frame: 1 month post procedure

07

Study locations

20 of 49 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Milojevic M, Myers PO, Falk V, Bavaria JE, Borger MA, Casselman FPA, Badhwar V, Kaul S, Siepe M, Sadaba JR. Methodological Appraisal of Ongoing Trial of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Younger Patients: From Incentives to Guideline-Informing Evidence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Dec 1;67(12):ezaf348. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf348. PubMed 41351226 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06861361
Lead sponsor
Ceric Sàrl
Collaborators
European Cardiovascular Research Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2025
Start date
May 15, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2037 (estimated)
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

Philippe Garot, MD
Contact
pgarot@angio-icps.com
+330160134602
Marie-Claude Morrice, MD
Contact
mcmorice@cerc-europe.org
Philippe Garot
principal investigator · European Cardiovascular Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion