An observational study in Spinal Muscular Atrophy, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 14 Days to 2 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.
Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Observational
The aim of this retrospective medical chart review is to describe the clinical outcomes, clinical characteristics, and demographics of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) at a single clinical center in Saudi Arabia. The study will use secondary data collected from the electronic medical records of SMA type 1 patients.
282 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Atrophy, Spinal; 73 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 6 is below the median of 139 across 114 observational studies indexed under Muscular Atrophy, Spinal.
Browse Muscular Atrophy, Spinal studies →Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,718 studies on the registry; 221 are open to participants now.
Of its 585 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 438 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
SMA type 1 patients receiving OA at a single clinical center in Saudi Arabia.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion criteria:
1. Any patient who does not fulfill any of the inclusion criteria listed above.
Patients with SMA type 1 who were treated with OA.
Proportion of SMA Type 1 Non-Sitters Patients Achieving Independent Sitting for ≥30 Seconds at Any Visit up to 12 Months After OA Administration
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) Score
CHOP-INTEND is a validated motor function assessment for infants with SMA. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating better motor function. Scores are derived from 16 items assessing spontaneous movement, strength, and motor abilities. An increase in score reflects improvement in motor function.
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Change From Baseline in CHOP-INTEND Score
CHOP-INTEND is a validated motor function assessment for infants with SMA. The total score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating better motor function. Scores are derived from 16 items assessing spontaneous movement, strength, and motor abilities. An increase in score reflects improvement in motor function.
Time frame: Baseline, up to approximately 3 years
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination-Section 2 (HINE-2, Motor Milestones) Score
The HINE-2 is a motor milestone assessment evaluating developmental abilities in infants. The total score ranges from 0 to 26, with higher scores indicating greater achievement of motor milestones. The scale assesses milestones such as head control, sitting, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking. Higher scores correspond to more advanced motor development.
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Change From Baseline in HINE-2 Score
The HINE-2 is a motor milestone assessment evaluating developmental abilities in infants. The total score ranges from 0 to 26, with higher scores indicating greater achievement of motor milestones. The scale assesses milestones such as head control, sitting, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking. Higher scores correspond to more advanced motor development.
Time frame: Baseline, up to approximately 3 years
Percentage of Patients who Maintain the Ability to Thrive at 12 Months After OA Treatment
Ability to thrive is defined as meeting the following criteria: * Ability to tolerate thin liquids, as demonstrated by a formal swallowing assessment, with tested consistency classified as "very thin" or "thin" and results recorded as "normal swallow," "functional swallow," or "safe for swallowing"; * No requirement for nutritional support via mechanical feeding methods (e.g., feeding tube); * Maintenance of body weight at or above the 3rd percentile for age and sex, according to World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards, appropriate for the child's age at assessment.
Time frame: 12 months
Number and Percentage of Patients Without Permanent Ventilatory Support or Death After OA Administration
Event-free survival of patients without permanent ventilatory support or death after OA administration. Permanent ventilatory support is defined as the requirement for either: * Tracheostomy, or * ≥16 hours per day of respiratory support (including non-invasive ventilation) for 14 or more consecutive days, in the absence of an acute reversible illness and excluding perioperative ventilation.
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Number and Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Number and Percentage of Patients by Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
Demographic and clinical characteristics include: * Sex * City of residence * Preterm birth status * Functional classification * Developmental milestones achieved prior to treatment initiation * SMA-related symptoms * Comorbidities * CHOP-INTEND Score * HINE-2 Score * Ambulatory status * Swallowing assessment result * Feeding method * Anthropometric measures
Time frame: Baseline
Age
Age, gestational age at birth, age at symptom onset, and age at SMA type 1 diagnosis.
Time frame: Baseline
Duration Between Symptom Onset and Diagnosis
Time frame: Baseline
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Feb 2027, 2 months later.
Start moved twice since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Aug 2026 → Nov 2026, last on Nov 10, 2026.
Primary completion moved twice since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Nov 2026 → Feb 2027, last on Nov 10, 2026.
Completion moved twice since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Nov 2026 → Feb 2027, last on Nov 10, 2026.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.