ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07731958Updated Jul 28, 2026

Unilateral vs. Bilateral Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

An interventional study of Unilateral LVRS and Bilateral LVRS in Emphysema, Pulmonary, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and severe emphysema: unilateral (operating on one lung) versus bilateral (operating on both lungs) lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

Read the detailed description

Lung volume reduction surgery removes damaged lung tissue to help patients breathe better, improve life quality, and increase exercise capacity. Historically, the hospital has performed this surgery unilaterally, while global standards often favor bilateral surgery to maximize lung function benefits.Existing data suggesting bilateral surgery is better is more than 20 years old, lacks randomization, and was gathered before modern surgical advances like keyhole surgery (VATS) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Additionally, bilateral surgery may carry higher risks of postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and prolonged air leaks. This study aims to provide modern, unbiased evidence to determine which approach is superior.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emphysema, Pulmonary

Keywords

  • Thoracic surgery
  • VATS
  • LVRS
  • Lung volume reduction surgery
  • Lung function
  • Mortality
  • Dyspnea
03

In context

Pulmonary Emphysema

64 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Emphysema; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 146 is above the median of 33 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Emphysema.

Browse Pulmonary Emphysema studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Suitable target areas in both lungs
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Speaks and understands Danish or English
  • obtained
  • Usual inclusion criteria in LVRS:

Moderate to severe with MRC score > 2 \< 75 years old 17 \< > 30 > 20% and \< 45% of predicted RV > 200% of predicted as a sign of relevant hyperinflation DLCO > 20% of predicted The patient should be in ideal medical treatment and have completed rehabilitation A high-resolution CT \< 3 months old should follow the referral to MDT Absence of nodules suspicious of on CT scan Absence of significant comorbidity including severe cardiovascular disease normal Absence of pulmonary hypertension, TI-gradient \< 40 mmHg Absence of chronic or frequent lung infections Smoking abstinence six months prior to surgery Assessed as sufficiently physically fit to undergo surgery and rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dependent on wheelchair
  • Living in nursery home
  • Dependent on walker device
  • Psychiatric disorder (anxiety, depression, schizophrenia)
  • Simultaneous lung cancer surgery
  • Massive adhesions during surgery assessed by the surgeon indicating problems postoperatively
  • Increased risk of post-operative bleeding assessed perioperatively by the surgeon.
  • Perioperative decision on not doing operation on the other side (medical, surgical or anaesthesiologic problems that favours a fast termination of the surgery, decided by the team in OR).
  • Previous cardiothoracic surgery
  • Increased bleeding risk (e.g., preoperative >2, overdue discontinuation of anticoagulants according to guidelines by the Danish Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, known coagulopathy).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
146 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bilateral LVRS

    Procedure: Bilateral LVRS

  • Active comparator
    Unilateral LVRS

    Procedure: Unilateral LVRS

Interventions

  • ProcedureUnilateral LVRS

    Both unilateral and bilateral LVRS are done with a standardized 3 port VATS access. Lower ligament is freed, no graspers on the parenchyma and stapling of the selected areas with a Signia™ powered stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology (Medtronic). The reloads will not be butressed and it will be vascular or parenchymal reloads. Two drains will be placed on the operated side and the same pain management will be applied including perioperative blocs and a pain catheter. The unilateral procedures will be performed with the patient in a side position. Postoperatively the drains will be removed when there is no sign of air leakage on the digital chest drain system. Chest x-ray will be performed to secure a fully inflated lung before discharge.

  • ProcedureBilateral LVRS

    Both unilateral and bilateral LVRS are done with a standardized 3 port VATS access. Lower ligament is freed, no graspers on the parenchyma and stapling of the selected areas with a Signia™ powered stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology (Medtronic). The reloads will not be butressed and it will be vascular or parenchymal reloads. Two drains will be placed on the operated side and the same pain management will be applied including perioperative blocs and a pain catheter. In the bilateral procedures the paBent will be positioned on the back and the side to be operated on liked by rotating the table. The surgeon is free to decide which side to deal with first. Postoperatively the drains will be removed when there is no sign of air leakage on the digital chest drain system. Chest x-ray will be performed to secure a fully inflated lung before discharge.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lung function

    Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second, or FEV1) is the primary outcome. All parameters in a complete lunge function test will be evaluated including diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, residual volume, total lung capacity, RV-to-TLC ratio.

    Time frame: 3 months and 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Thirty day mortality rate

    Time frame: Thirty days from surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Dyspnea

    MRC-score and CAT-score

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months after surgery

  2. Physical activity

    Six minute walking test (meters)

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months after surgery

  3. Postoperative complications

    Rate of procedure related complications including pneumonia and empyema.

    Time frame: During admission

  4. Chest drain

    Number of days with chest drain

    Time frame: During admittance

  5. Length of stay

    Length of stay

    Time frame: During admittance

  6. Reoperation rate

    Reoperation rate due to airleak, bleeding or other causes

    Time frame: During admittance

  7. Admittance to ICU

    Admittance to ICU.

    Time frame: During admittance

  8. Quality of life score

    Saint George Respiratory Questionaire

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months after surgery

  9. Physical activity level

    Activity wristband measuring physical activity out of hospital.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2031, 76 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 17, 2026
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
StartActual
Mar 21, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2031
CompletionEst.
Jul 2032
Last update
Jul 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07731958
Collaborators
Medtronic
Responsible party
Alberte Lund (MD and Phd student, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
Start date
Mar 21, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

Alberte Lund, MD
Contact
alberte.lund@regionh.dk
+4535458016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion