An interventional study of Endobronchial Therman Liquid Ablation (ETLA) in Emphysema or COPD, Emphysema and Emphysema, Pulmonary, sponsored by Morair Medtech, LLC. Recruiting at 7 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-28.
Sponsored by Morair Medtech, LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial thermal liquid ablation (ETLA) works to treat severe emphysema in terms of feasibility and safety.
Participants will:
ETLA offers the potential to result in significant lung volume reduction of hyperinflated emphysematous regions, providing clinically meaningful improvement in pulmonary function and quality of life to a broad population of patients with severe emphysema. The REDUCE EU Pilot study will primarily evaluate the feasibility and safety of ETLA treatment in patients with severe emphysema. Secondarily, the study will evaluate the efficacy of sequential ETLA treatment.
339 studies on the registry are indexed under Emphysema; 59 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 48 across 208 interventional studies indexed under Emphysema.
Browse Emphysema studies →This is the only study on the registry with Morair Medtech, LLC as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will undergo up to two ETLA procedures separated by a minimum three-month interval.
Device: Endobronchial Therman Liquid Ablation (ETLA)
The ETLA System is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic treatment designed to deliver heated normal saline to targeted emphysematous lung regions with hyperinflation to cause tissue ablation and subsequent volume reduction as a means for treating emphysema. The ETLA procedures will be performed under general anesthesia. Each procedure will be limited to treatment in a single lung, with either unilateral or bilateral treatment over the two procedures.
Also known as: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
Percent of procedures where the device operated as intended
Percent of procedures where the device operated as intended per the Instructions for Use (IFU)
Time frame: Through completion of the second procedure, approximately 13 weeks
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAE)
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAE) associated with the ETLA device and/or procedure as adjudicated by an independent medical monitor.
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of adverse events
Incidence of all adverse events associated with the ETLA device and/or procedure
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAE)
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAE) associated with the ETLA device and/or procedure as adjudicated by an independent medical monitor
Time frame: 9 months
Residual volume (RV) change
Change in residual volume (RV) (mL, % change in absolute and % predicted)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
FEV1 change
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1) (mL, % change in absolute and % predicted)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
RV/TLC change
Change in residual volume (RV) over total lung capacity (TLC) (RV/TLC)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
6MWT change
Change in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
SGRQ-C change
Change in SGRQ-C (Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
Target Lobe Volume Reduction
Target Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) as measured by CT scan quantified by the reduction in the volume of the targeted lobe(s) (reported in mL)
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-procedure 1, 3 months post-procedure 1 to 3 months post-procedure 2
Cumulative Lobar Volume Reduction
Cumulative Lobar Volume Reduction as measured by CT scan, quantified by the summation of TLVR through both procedures (reported in mL)
Time frame: Through follow-up of the second procedure, approximately 6 Months
Catheter positioning allowing treatment
Percent of target regions where the catheter is placed in the target airway with positioning allowing treatment
Time frame: Through completion of the second procedure, approximately 13 weeks
Heated saline at predetermined volume
Percent of target regions where heated saline is delivered at the predetermined volume per treatment plan
Time frame: Through completion of the second procedure, approximately 13 weeks
Auxiliary reduction
Number of procedures where auxiliary reduction is observed in a region not predicted
Time frame: Through follow-up of the second procedure, approximately 6 Months
Responder analyses
Responder analyses for: * Improvement in FEV1 of ≥ 12% * Reduction in RV of ≥ 6% * Reduction in RV/TLC of ≥ 3% * Increase in 6MWD of ≥ 26 meters * Improvement in SGRQ-C of ≥ 4 points
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
TLC change
Change in Total Lung Capacity (TLC)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
CAT score change
Change in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
BODE index change
Change in BODE index (body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
DLCO change
Change in DLCO (lung diffusion test)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
mMRC change
Change in mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea questionnaire)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 13 months after the start.
Of 61 interventional studies with no phase under Emphysema, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.