ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07722351Updated Jul 23, 2026

Homocysteic Acid Biostimulator for Photoaged Facial Skin

An interventional study of Chemical skin biostimulation with ammonium trichloroacetate and homocysteic acid in Skin Aging and Hyperpigmentation, sponsored by Medical University of Silesia. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to female participants aged 39 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Medical University of Silesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
39 Years to 69 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluated whether a chemical skin biostimulator containing ammonium trichloroacetate, homocysteic acid, phytic acid and citric acid can improve signs of photoaged skin in women with mature skin. Twenty-five women received four treatment sessions two weeks apart, followed by a home-care skincare regimen. Skin firmness, wrinkles, skin texture, hydration, sebum production and, in participants with hyperpigmentation, skin tone uniformity were measured before treatment and at 2 and 12 weeks after the treatment series to determine whether the biostimulator produces lasting improvement in photoaged skin without the downtime associated with traditional chemical peels.

Read the detailed description

This was a single-arm, prospective, open-label study conducted at a single academic centre to assess the clinical and instrumental effects of a chemical skin biostimulator (PRX plus, WiQO, Trieste, Italy) on facial photoaging. The intervention combines ammonium trichloroacetate (ATCA), a controlled-penetration TCA derivative intended to stimulate dermal fibroblast activity and collagen remodelling, with homocysteic acid (HoA), a novel antioxidant and NMDA-receptor-modulating molecule proposed to influence keratinocyte differentiation, epidermal barrier function and melanocyte activity, together with low concentrations of phytic and citric acids providing mild keratolytic and antioxidant effects. Treatment consisted of a standardised four-session protocol (three product layers per session) applied to defined facial regions of interest, combined with a daytime regenerating cream, a nighttime glycolic-acid-containing fluid, and, in participants with hyperpigmentation, a twice-daily lightening serum. Outcomes were assessed instrumentally using Cutometer (skin viscoelasticity), Antera 3D (wrinkle volume and surface texture), corneometry and sebumetry (hydration and sebum), and grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis of standardised cross-polarised photographs (skin tone homogeneity in the hyperpigmented subgroup), at baseline, 2 weeks after the final session, and 12 weeks after completion of the treatment series, to characterise both the immediate and sustained effects of the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Aging
  • Hyperpigmentation

Keywords

  • chemical skin biostimulator
  • photoaging
  • homocysteic acid
  • ammonium trichloroacetate
  • skin elasticity
  • wrinkle reduction
  • melasma
  • Cutometer
  • Antera 3D
  • grey-level co-occurrence matrix
03

In context

Hyperpigmentation

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperpigmentation; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 32 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Hyperpigmentation.

Browse Hyperpigmentation studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Silesia is the lead sponsor of 115 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
39 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female, Fitzpatrick skin phototype II
  • Age 39-69 years
  • Clinical signs of facial photoaging
  • Some participants had hyperpigmentation (melasma or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Ongoing hormone therapy
  • Systemic use within 3 months prior to inclusion
  • Topical retinoid use within 1 month, or oral retinoid use within 6 months, prior to treatment
  • Chemical peel procedures within 1 month prior to treatment
  • Use of arbutin and/or hydroquinone within 3 months prior to treatment
  • Laser-based treatments within 3 months prior to treatment
  • Active inflammatory dermatoses
  • diseases
  • Renal impairment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chemical skin biostimulator (ATCA/HoA) plus home-care regimen

    Women with clinical signs of facial photoaging received four sessions, at 14-day intervals, of a topical chemical skin biostimulator containing ammonium trichloroacetate (ATCA), homocysteic acid (HoA), phytic acid and citric acid (PRX plus, WiQO), followed by a standardised home-care regimen consisting of a regenerating cream (morning), a glycolic-acid-containing fluid (evening), and, in participants with hyperpigmentation, a lightening serum applied twice daily to affected areas.

    Procedure: Chemical skin biostimulation with ammonium trichloroacetate and homocysteic acid

Interventions

  • ProcedureChemical skin biostimulation with ammonium trichloroacetate and homocysteic acid

    A four-session chemical skin biostimulation procedure using a topical formulation containing ammonium trichloroacetate (ATCA), homocysteic acid (HoA), phytic acid and citric acid (PRX plus, WiQO, Trieste, Italy). At each session, three product layers were applied to predefined facial areas (forehead, nose, cheeks, chin, upper lip) with massage until absorption, followed by cold-water rinse. Sessions were repeated at 14-day intervals. Participants additionally followed a standardised home-care regimen: a regenerating shea-butter cream each morning, a glycolic-acid-containing fluid each evening, and, for participants with hyperpigmentation, a lightening serum applied twice daily to affected areas, together with daily broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF 50+).

    Also known as: PRX plus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Skin Viscoelasticity (Cutometer R2, R5, R7)

    Skin viscoelasticity assessed by Cutometer, reported as gross elasticity (R2), net elasticity (R5) and biological elasticity (R7); each is a dimensionless ratio ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater skin elasticity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  2. Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Volume (Antera 3D)

    Wrinkle volume at the nasolabial folds, glabellar lines, forehead lines, and crow's feet, measured in mm³ by Antera 3D three-dimensional imaging.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  3. Change From Baseline in Skin Texture Score (Antera 3D)

    A proprietary continuous index from the Antera 3D imaging software (Miravex) reflecting skin surface irregularity, with no manufacturer-published fixed range; observed values in this study ranged from approximately 20 to 55, with higher values indicating rougher skin.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  4. Change From Baseline in Skin Roughness (Antera 3D, Ra)

    Arithmetic roughness (Ra), measured in micrometres (µm) by Antera 3D.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  5. Change From Baseline in Maximum Wrinkle Height (Antera 3D)

    Maximum surface height of wrinkles, measured in millimetres (mm) by Antera 3D.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  6. Change From Baseline in Skin Hydration

    Skin hydration measured by corneometry (arbitrary corneometer units).

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  7. Change From Baseline in Sebum Secretion

    Sebum secretion measured by sebumetry.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  8. Change From Baseline in Skin Tone Contrast (GLCM) in Participants With Hyperpigmentation

    Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) contrast index in the hyperpigmented subgroup (n=14), assessed from standardised cross-polarised photographs.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

  9. Change From Baseline in Skin Tone Homogeneity (GLCM) in Participants With Hyperpigmentation

    Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) homogeneity index (range 0-1; higher values indicate greater uniformity) in the hyperpigmented subgroup (n=14).

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Self-Assessed Facial Appearance, Neck Appearance, Wrinkle Depth, and Skin Firmness

    Participants' perceived change in facial appearance, neck appearance, wrinkle depth, and skin firmness after the treatment series, each rated on a Likert scale from -5 (marked worsening) to +5 (marked improvement), with 0 indicating no change.

    Time frame: Immediately after the fourth treatment session (each session is a single-day clinic visit; the four sessions were administered at 14-day intervals), compared with baseline

  2. Satisfaction With Wrinkle-Reduction and Firming Effects

    Participants' satisfaction with the wrinkle-reduction effect and with the firming effect of the treatment, each rated on a scale from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (extremely satisfied).

    Time frame: Immediately after the fourth treatment session (each session is a single-day clinic visit; the four sessions were administered at 14-day intervals)

  3. Proportion of Participants Satisfied With Facial and Neck Appearance

    Percentage of participants reporting satisfaction with the appearance of their face and neck, assessed before treatment and after the treatment series.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the fourth treatment session (each session is a single-day clinic visit; the four sessions were administered at 14-day intervals)

  4. Percentage Retention of Maximal Improvement in Wrinkle Volume and Skin Texture at 12 Weeks

    Persistence of the treatment effect, calculated as the percentage of the maximal improvement (observed at 2 weeks) that was retained at 12 weeks, for wrinkle volume and skin texture/roughness parameters measured by Antera 3D.

    Time frame: 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the treatment series

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Local Skin Reactions and Adverse Events

    Clinical monitoring for adverse events and local skin reactions associated with the procedure.

    Time frame: Throughout the treatment series and follow-up period, up to 12 weeks after the last session

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Practical Cosmetology and Skin Diagnostics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
    Sosnowiec, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen FP, Lee N, Soong YK, Huang KE. Short- and long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women. Chang Gung Med J. 2001 Jul;24(7):431-9. PubMed 11565249 ↗
  • FORBES JI. Myasthenia gravis in an African woman. Cent Afr J Med. 1960 Jul;6:295-7. No abstract available. PubMed 13823881 ↗
  • Houshmand EB. Effect of glycolic acid, phytic acid, soothing complex containing Emulsion on Hyperpigmentation and skin luminosity: A clinical evaluation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Mar;20(3):776-780. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13950. Epub 2021 Feb 2. PubMed 33458927 ↗
  • Genever PG, Maxfield SJ, Kennovin GD, Maltman J, Bowgen CJ, Raxworthy MJ, Skerry TM. Evidence for a novel glutamate-mediated signaling pathway in keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1999 Mar;112(3):337-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00509.x. PubMed 10084312 ↗
  • Cuenod M, Do KQ, Herrling PL, Turski WA, Matute C, Streit P. Homocysteic acid, an endogenous agonist of NMDA-receptor: release, neuroactivity and localization. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1986;203:253-62. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7971-3_19. No abstract available. PubMed 2878563 ↗
  • Passeron T, Picardo M. Melasma, a photoaging disorder. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018 Jul;31(4):461-465. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12684. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PubMed 29285880 ↗
  • Shin JW, Kwon SH, Choi JY, Na JI, Huh CH, Choi HR, Park KC. Molecular Mechanisms of Dermal Aging and Antiaging Approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;20(9):2126. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092126. PubMed 31036793 ↗
  • Gromkowska-Kepka KJ, Puscion-Jakubik A, Markiewicz-Zukowska R, Socha K. The impact of ultraviolet radiation on skin photoaging - review of in vitro studies. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Nov;20(11):3427-3431. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14033. Epub 2021 Mar 13. PubMed 33655657 ↗
  • Miao F, Wan J, Zhou Y, Shi Y. Unraveling Melasma: From Epidermal Pigmentation to Microenvironmental Dysregulation. Biology (Basel). 2025 Oct 13;14(10):1402. doi: 10.3390/biology14101402. PubMed 41154805 ↗
  • Lee H, Hong Y, Kim M. Structural and Functional Changes and Possible Molecular Mechanisms in Aged Skin. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 19;22(22):12489. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212489. PubMed 34830368 ↗
  • Ni J, Wang N, Gao L, Li L, Zheng S, Liu Y, Ozukum M, Nikiforova A, Zhao G, Song Z. The effect of the NMDA receptor-dependent signaling pathway on cell morphology and melanosome transfer in melanocytes. J Dermatol Sci. 2016 Dec;84(3):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.08.534. Epub 2016 Aug 24. PubMed 27596138 ↗
  • Kaltchenko MV, Chien AL. Photoaging: Current Concepts on Molecular Mechanisms, Prevention, and Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 May;26(3):321-344. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00933-z. Epub 2025 Mar 12. PubMed 40072791 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article are included in the article and its supplementary materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, beginning from the date of publication, with no specified end date.

Access criteria: Data will be made available to qualified researchers who submit a reasonable request to the corresponding author (Anna Deda, adeda@sum.edu.pl), for the purpose of methodologically sound reanalysis, subject to authors' approval.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07722351
Collaborators
WiQO (Trieste, Italy)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 29, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026
Completion
Apr 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Deda, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
Dominika Wcisło-Dziadecka, Prof
study chair · Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
Sławomir Wilczyński, Prof
study director · Medical University of Silesia in Katowice

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion