ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07716306Updated Jul 21, 2026

Remotely Supervised Exercise During Chemotherapy in Women With Breast Cancer

An interventional study of Intervention Group in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Riga Stradins University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Latvia. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-21.

Sponsored by Riga Stradins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The RE-CARE project is designed to evaluate the effects of a 24-week, remotely supervised, combined high-intensity interval aerobic and resistance exercise training on physical health and quality of life in patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The study will enroll women aged 30-65 years with previously untreated, primary breast cancer, clinical stage IIA-IIB or IIIA-IIIC, who are scheduled to receive doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based NACT. Participants will be randomly allocated to either an experimental intervention group or a control group. At baseline, comprehensive assessments will be conducted to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness, physical endurance, muscle strength, cognitive function, and health-related quality of life. The primary objective is to determine the impact of the remotely supervised combined aerobic and resistance exercise on incidence and severity of NACT-related adverse effects in patients with BC.

Read the detailed description

Participants in the RE-CARE intervention group will be scheduled for 2-3 training sessions per week on non-consecutive days throughout the entire chemotherapy period (\~24 weeks), ensuring no more than 48 hours elapse between two sessions. Each participant will first complete a 30-40 minute individualized introductory session to learn correct exercise techniques using the training equipment.

Each aerobic high intensity interval training session will begin with a 6-minute warm-up at a self-selected walking speed gradually increasing to moderate intensity (approximately 60-70% HRmax), corresponding to 4 on the Modified Borg scale (moderate perceived exertion) by the end of the warm-up. Following this, the main segment will consist of four 4-minute walking intervals at 85-95% HRmax (7-8 on the Modified Borg scale). Each 4-minute high-intensity interval will be interspersed with 3 minutes of active recovery at 55-70% HRmax (4 on the Modified Borg scale). The total duration of session will therefore be 34 minutes.

For resistance training, participants will perform 3-4 sets of 6 repetitions, with a 2-minute rest interval between sets. The initial workload will be set at 70% of the participant's estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM), corresponding to 6-7 on the Modified Borg scale, and will be increased to 80% (7-8 on the Modified Borg scale) once participants are able to complete more than 6 repetitions. The RT program will target major muscle groups of the legs, shoulders, and arms. Each RT session will last 35 minutes in total, including a 6-minute warm-up and a 3-minute cool-down.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Physical health
  • Combined exercise
  • Aerobic exercise
  • Resistance training
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Riga Stradins University is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • previously untreated primary breast cancer;
  • stage IIA-B, IIIA-C at diagnosis;
  • diagnosis established by core needle ;
  • age 30-65 years;
  • prescribed doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based NACT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiac pathologies (assessed by echocardiogram);
  • blood transfusion in the last six months;
  • another oncological disease;
  • previous chemotherapy, hormonal or X-ray treatment;
  • participation in another clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The control group will maintain their routine activities and usual care and will receive the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines (Campbell et al., 2019), but they will not be assigned any structured physical exercise program during the study period.

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Other: Intervention Group

Interventions

  • OtherIntervention Group

    The intervention group will receive remotely supervised sessions conducted by health professionals approximately three times per week for 24 weeks, ensuring no more than 48 hours elapse between two sessions. Individually customized aerobic high intensity interval and resistance training sessions will be carried out on alternating days using a smartwatch, heart rate monitor (polar H10 sensor), resistance bands with real-time monitoring sensors (bandcizer sensor), and the linked smartphone applications (Resistance Band Tracker and Polar Flow).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in cardiorespiratory functioning, assessed by incremental test according to the University of Northern Colorado Cancer Rehabilitation Institute (UNCCRI) Treadmill protocol

    The UNCCRI Treadmill Protocol includes twenty-one 1-minute stages, with systematic increments in treadmill speed and/or grade at each stage. Outcome measures will include maximal oxygen uptake (max ml/kg/min) and ventilatory variables such as minute ventilation (L/min) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Heart rate (beats/min) will be continuously monitored throughout each test using a heart rate monitor. Time to exhaustion, treadmill speed, and treadmill grade will be recorded at the point of test termination. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  2. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life, assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Participants will be asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30, a 30-item questionnaire, electronically. This instrument includes a global health status/quality-of-life scale and multiple functional subscales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning). It further incorporates several symptom subscales assessing fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Patients respond to the items using Likert scale (1 = "Not at all," 2 = "A little," 3 = "Quite a bit," and 4 = "Very much"). All scales and single-item measures yield scores ranging from 0 to 100%. For the functional scales, higher scores indicate better functioning, but for the symptom scales, higher scores reflect greater symptom severity. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  3. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life, assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire - Breast Specific module EORTC QLQ-BR23.

    In addition, participants will complete the EORTC QLQ-BR23, a 23-item, breast cancer-specific questionnaire that includes functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and symptom scales (systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms). Patients respond to the items using Likert scale (1 = "Not at all," 2 = "A little," 3 = "Quite a bit," and 4 = "Very much"). All scales and single-item measures yield scores ranging from 0 to 100%. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in body composition assessed by Body Height (m)

    Body height will be measured in meters

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  2. Change in body composition assessed by Body Weight (kg)

    Body weight will be measured in kilograms

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  3. Change in body composition assessed by Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Participant body weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  4. Change in physical functioning, assessed by 6 Minute Walk tests (6MWT)

    Throughout the test, heart rate will be continuously recorded using a Polar H10 sensor. The test course will consist of a 30 m straight track located in an undisturbed indoor corridor, with turning points marked by cones. Participants will be instructed to walk back and forth along the course at their maximal tolerable walking pace, aiming to cover the greatest possible distance within the allotted time. Standardized verbal encouragement will be provided, and the remaining time will be announced at 1-minute intervals. The test will be terminated after exactly 6 minutes, at which point the total walking distance in meters will be recorded. Immediately following completion of the test, participants will rate their perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg Scale. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  5. Change in lower limb strength, assessed by 30 second sit to stand (30STS)

    Participants will be instructed to rise from a chair without using their hands, performing as fast as possible and as many repetitions as possible within 30 seconds. Higher performance scores will be interpreted as better lower body muscle strength and greater functional independence. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  6. Change in lower limb strength, assessed by 5x sit to stand (5xSTS)

    Participants will be instructed to rise from a chair without using their hands, performing five repetitions as fast as possible. Results will be measured in seconds. Higher performance scores will be interpreted as better lower body muscle strength and greater functional independence. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the interventio

  7. Change in upper limb strength, assessed by handgrip dynamometer

    Participants will be instructed to squeeze the device as hard as possible. They will be asked to apply the force in a smooth, continuous manner, avoiding any jerking movements or rapid wrenching of the device. Each participant will perform three trials during a single assessment session and scores will be measured in kg. Higher performance scores will be interpreted as better upper-body muscular strength. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  8. Change in cognitive functioning, assessed by Digit Span test

    Measures of forward and backward digit span are among the oldest and most widely used neuropsychological tests of short-term verbal memory.Throughout the digit span tasks, participants will be presented with a sequence of digits and instructed to repeat them in the identical order. Afterwards participants will be presented with another series of digits but required to repeat the sequence in reverse order. Following parameters will be evaluated: 1) Span Length 2) Total Score. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  9. Change in cognitive functioning, assessed by Stroop test

    Stroop test assesses the ability to inhibit cognitive interference, which occurs when the processing of a stimulus feature affects the simultaneous processing of another attribute of the same stimulus. It measures attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility and working memory. Participants will be shown color words printed in inconsistent ink colors (for example, the word "red" printed in green ink). They will be instructed to name the ink color rather than read the word. Two primary kinds of units will be used for measurement: time and number of errors. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  10. Change in cognitive functioning, assessed by The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was developed to assess abstraction and the ability to shift cognitive strategies in response to changing environmental contingencies. It is considered a measure of executive function. During the tests four cards (a red triangle, two green stars, three yellow crosses, and four blue circles) will be placed in front of the participant. The participants will be shown a set of response cards that can be matched to the stimulus cards based on color, shape or number. Multiple parameters will be evaluated: 1) number of correct sorts, 2) categories 3) perseverative errors, 4) set-loss errors. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

  11. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life, assessed by Weekly Health Monitoring

    Participants will be requested to complete a weekly electronic survey consisting of seven questions. Questions will address commonly observed chemotherapy-related adverse effects: physical functioning; psychological functioning; pain; fatigue; social functioning and sleep quality. For each domain, participants will indicate the duration of symptom occurrence using the following response options: every day, 5-6 days, 3-4 days, 1-2 days, or none of the days. In addition, five specific chemotherapy-related symptoms (i.e., nausea, vomiting, constipation, numbness in the legs or arms, and rash/ulceration of the skin) will be listed at the end of the survey. Data obtained will be analyzed using repeated-measures analysis and linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Klavina A, Ceseiko R, Campa M, Jermolenko GF, Eglitis K, Llorente A, Line A. The Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Quality of Life and Incidence of Chemotherapy Side Effects in Women With Breast Cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241297385. doi: 10.1177/15347354241297385. PubMed 39548802 ↗
  • Kopp B, Lange F, Steinke A. The Reliability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Clinical Practice. Assessment. 2021 Jan;28(1):248-263. doi: 10.1177/1073191119866257. Epub 2019 Aug 2. PubMed 31375035 ↗
  • Diaz-Balboa E, Gonzalez-Salvado V, Rodriguez-Romero B, Martinez-Monzonis A, Pedreira-Perez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Lopez-Lopez R, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Pena-Gil C. Thirty-second sit-to-stand test as an alternative for estimating peak oxygen uptake and 6-min walking distance in women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):8251-8260. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07268-z. Epub 2022 Jul 11. PubMed 35819522 ↗
  • Woods DL, Kishiyamaa MM, Lund EW, Herron TJ, Edwards B, Poliva O, Hink RF, Reed B. Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;33(1):101-11. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.493149. PubMed 20680884 ↗
  • Scarpina F, Tagini S. The Stroop Color and Word Test. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28446889 ↗
  • Kee Shackelford DY, Brown JM, Peterson BM, Schaffer J, Hayward R (2017) The University of Northern Colorado Cancer Rehabilitation Institute Treadmill Protocol Accurately Measures VO2peak in Cancer Survivors . Int J Phys Med Rehabil 5: 437. doi: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000437
  • Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, Jager E, Banzer W. Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;34(7):631-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1323746. Epub 2013 Feb 26. PubMed 23444095 ↗
  • Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, Zucker DS, Matthews CE, Ligibel JA, Gerber LH, Morris GS, Patel AV, Hue TF, Perna FM, Schmitz KH. Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2375-2390. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116. PubMed 31626055 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Mar 2028, 14 months later.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 22, 2026
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 2027
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 2028
Last update
Jul 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07716306
Lead sponsor
Riga Stradins University
Responsible party
Aija Klavina (Dr. Aija Klavina, principal investigator, lead researcher at the Laboratory of Sports and nutrition research (RSU) and professor at the Lithuanian Sport University, Department of Rehabilitation and Health promotion., Riga Stradins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 21, 2026

Study contacts

Aija Klavina, PhD
Contact
aija.klavina@rsu.lv
+371 29203488
Sintija Liepina, Msc
Contact
sintija.liepina@rsu.edu.lv
+371 27825885

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion