ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07828509Updated Oct 5, 2026

A Retrospective Study on Long-Term Technical Complications of Single Metal-Ceramic Crowns With a Supplementary Questionnaire Survey

An observational study in Metal Ceramic Restorations and Gingival Health, sponsored by Riga Stradins University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Latvia. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Riga Stradins University · Observational

Updated Oct 5, 2026Primary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
79
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and biological complications associated with metal-ceramic crowns. Patient dental records will be reviewed to identify eligible participants, who will subsequently be invited for a clinical examination. The clinical condition of the metal-ceramic crowns and the supporting teeth and periodontal tissues will be assessed using predefined clinical criteria. The study aims to provide information on the long-term clinical performance of metal-ceramic crowns and the occurrence of associated biological complications. Participants will also compleate a questionnaire assessing oral health-related habits and satisfaction with metal-ceramic crown.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metal Ceramic Restorations
  • Gingival Health

Keywords

  • Technical complications
  • Questionnaire
  • Metal-Ceramic crowns
  • Biological complications
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riga Stradins University is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients who received metal-ceramic crowns and were identified through a review of dental records according to predefined eligibility criteria. Eligible patients were invited to participate in a clinical examination and questionnaire assessment.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients with at least one metal-ceramic single crown meeting the predefined study criteria.
  • ability and willingness to participate in the clinical examination and complete the questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • teeth serving as abutments for fixed partial prostheses (FPPs)
  • teeth as abutments for removable partial dentures (RPDs)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
79 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with single Metal-Ceramic crown

    Patients who received metal- ceramic single crown and are evaluated for the clinical condition of the restoration and gingival tissues. Patients were asked to complete a modified questionnaire in Latvian organizing the information into the following sections: oral hygiene habits (4 questions), disadvantages/ encumbrances with the crown (3 questions) and satisfaction (1 question) using Likert-style scale.

    Device: Metal-Ceramic dental single crown

Interventions

  • DeviceMetal-Ceramic dental single crown

    Metal - ceramic single crowns previously placed as part of routine dental treatment. No crowns are placed as part of this observational study. The existing restorations and supporting tissues are evaluated during clinical examination. The questionnaire was completed in paper format prior to the clinical examination and in the presence of the clinician. Responses were coded numerically for descriptive purposes, and mean satisfaction scores with standard deviations are reported.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technical complications of metal-ceramic single crown

    The assessed clinical parameters, based on the modified USPHS criteria, included veneer chipping, wear of the occlusal surface, anatomical form/contour, marginal adaptation, color match, and secondary caries, with the worst recorded score (0-3) being documented.

    Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Outcome: Gingival Index (GI)

    Gingival health was evaluated using the Silness and Löe Gingival Index (GI). The mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual sites of each tooth were scored, and the mean GI value was calculated for each tooth.

    Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026

  2. Secondary Outcome: Gingival pocket depth (PD)

    Gingival pocket depth was measured in millimeters at six sites around each tooth using a periodontal probe. The distance from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket was recorded, and the deepest measurement was used for analysis.

    Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026

  3. Secondary Outcome: Gingival recession (GR)

    To assess gingival recession (GR), the distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the gingival margin was recorded in millimeters with the greatest value considered for each tooth.

    Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026

  4. Oral hygiene and dental care habits

    Oral hygiene and dental care habits were assessed using four patient-reported questionnaire items: frequency of dental visits, frequency of tooth brushing per day, mouthwash use, and interdental cleaning practices and types of products. Each item was assessed using predefined response categories and summarized separately using descriptive statistics; no composite score was calculated.

    Time frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.

  5. Patient-reported problems associated with the metal-ceramic crown

    Patient-reported problems associated with the metal-ceramic crown were assessed using three questionnaire items: gingival bleeding around the crown, food impaction between the crown and adjacent tooth (including type of food), and presence of bad breath. Each item was assessed using predefined response categories and summarized separately using descriptive statistics; no composite score was calculated.

    Time frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.

  6. Patient satisfaction with the metal-ceramic crown

    Patient satisfaction with the appearance and function of the metal-ceramic crown was assessed using a 6-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 5 (completely satisfied), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not currently planned to be shared. Study results will be reported in aggregated form in scientific publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionTechnical complications of metal-ceramic single crown: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 5, 2026
Secondary outcomes
6 added, 2 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedSecondary Outcome: Gingival Index (GI)Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026
  • AddedSecondary Outcome: Gingival pocket depth (PD)Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026
  • AddedSecondary Outcome: Gingival recession (GR)Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026
  • AddedOral hygiene and dental care habitsTime frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.
  • AddedPatient-reported problems associated with the metal-ceramic crownTime frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.
  • AddedPatient satisfaction with the metal-ceramic crownTime frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.
  • RemovedBiological complications of metal-ceramic single crownsTime frame: Clinical examination in 2026
  • RemovedQuestionnaire on hygiene habits and satisfactionTime frame: Prior clinical examination in 2026
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionTechnical complications of metal-ceramic single crown: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 6 added, 2 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedSecondary Outcome: Gingival Index (GI)Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026
    • AddedSecondary Outcome: Gingival pocket depth (PD)Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026
    • AddedSecondary Outcome: Gingival recession (GR)Time frame: Clinical examination in 2026
    • AddedOral hygiene and dental care habitsTime frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.
    • AddedPatient-reported problems associated with the metal-ceramic crownTime frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.
    • AddedPatient satisfaction with the metal-ceramic crownTime frame: Prior to clinical examination in 2026.
    • RemovedBiological complications of metal-ceramic single crownsTime frame: Clinical examination in 2026
    • RemovedQuestionnaire on hygiene habits and satisfactionTime frame: Prior clinical examination in 2026
    + 3 other changes: responsible party, description and conditions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07828509
Lead sponsor
Riga Stradins University
Responsible party
Elīna Bluma (Assistant, DDS, Prosthodontist, Riga Stradins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
May 25, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Una Soboļeva, PhD
principal investigator · Riga Stradins University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion