ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07708363Updated Jul 16, 2026

Bracket Positioning Techniques and Quality of Orthodontic Finishing

An interventional study of Smile Arc Protection (SAP) bracket positioning and Smile Arc and Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) bracket positioning; Procedure in Malocclusion, Angle Class I and Dental Crowding, sponsored by Future University in Egypt. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Future University in Egypt · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2024, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This three-arm randomized clinical trial compares three orthodontic bracket positioning techniques - Smile Arc Protection (SAP), Smile Arc and Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA), and the McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT) bracket placement chart (control) - in young patients with Angle Class I malocclusion and mild-to-moderate crowding treated non-extraction. The primary aim is to determine which technique yields the highest quality of orthodontic finishing, measured with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). Secondary aims compare anterior tooth tip and torque (assessed by CBCT) and mini-esthetic smile parameters (gingival display, incisal display, buccal corridor, and smile arc, assessed on standardized posed-smile photographs) among the three techniques.

Read the detailed description

Bracket positioning is one of the most influential operator-dependent factors affecting the quality of orthodontic finishing and the resulting smile esthetics. Three contemporary positioning philosophies are compared in this trial.

Design. Eligible participants are randomly allocated 1:1:1 to one of three parallel arms. Allocation is generated with an online randomizer, concealed in sequentially opaque sealed envelopes held by a co-supervisor, and revealed only on the day of intervention. Outcome assessors are blinded; operator blinding is not feasible.

Intervention. All arms receive a fully digital indirect-bonding workflow (intraoral scanning, virtual bracket placement in 3Shape Ortho-Analyzer, 3D-printed casts, vacuum-formed transfer trays) using a 0.018-inch MBT prescription, and an identical arch wire sequence ending in a 0.017 in × 0.025 in stainless steel wire maintained for three months. The arms differ only in the vertical/angular bracket-positioning rule applied (SAP, SAMRA, or MBT chart).

Assessment. Records are captured before bonding (T₀) and at the end of levelling and alignment (T₁). The ABO-OGS is scored on 3D-printed casts and the panoramic radiograph; tip and torque are measured on dentoalveolar CBCT; mini-esthetic parameters are measured on standardized frontal posed-smile photographs calibrated in Adobe Photoshop.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class I
  • Dental Crowding

Keywords

  • Bracket positioning
  • Smile arc
  • Indirect bonding
  • ABO Objective Grading System
  • Mini-esthetics
  • Tip and torque
  • Orthodontic finishing
03

In context

Malocclusion, Angle Class I

35 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class I; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is above the median of 32 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class I.

Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class I studies →

Lead sponsor

Future University in Egypt is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and females aged 14-25 years with a full permanent dentition.
  2. Mild to moderate crowding requiring non-extraction orthodontic treatment (2-6 mm per Graber's classification).
  3. Angle Class I malocclusion.
  4. Normal skeletal vertical dimension (SN-MP angle 32° ± 5°).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Medication that may cause gingival inflammation (e.g., cyclosporine, phenytoin).

    2. Impacted, extracted, or missing permanent teeth (except third molars). 3. Periodontal disease or parafunctional habits (bruxism, tongue thrusting, mouth breathing).

    4. History of previous orthodontic treatment. 5. Craniofacial anomalies, facial asymmetry, or skeletal discrepancy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group SAP

    Bracket positioning by the Smile Arc Protection technique (anterior brackets placed relatively more gingival, referenced to canine crown height).

    Procedure: Smile Arc Protection (SAP) bracket positioning

  • Experimental
    Group SAMRA

    Bracket positioning by the Smile Arc and Marginal Ridge Approach (digital workflow referencing the marginal-ridge line and facial axis).

    Procedure: Smile Arc and Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) bracket positioning; Procedure

  • Active comparator
    Group MBT (Control)

    Bracket positioning by the McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi bracket placement chart (bracket-to-incisal-edge distances from the standardized chart).

    Procedure: McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT) chart bracket positioning

Interventions

  • ProcedureSmile Arc Protection (SAP) bracket positioning

    Bracket positioning by the Smile Arc Protection technique (anterior brackets placed relatively more gingival, referenced to canine crown height).

  • ProcedureSmile Arc and Marginal Ridge Approach (SAMRA) bracket positioning; Procedure

    Bracket positioning by the Smile Arc and Marginal Ridge Approach (digital workflow referencing the marginal-ridge line and facial axis).

  • ProcedureMcLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT) chart bracket positioning

    Bracket positioning by the McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi bracket placement chart (bracket-to-incisal-edge distances from the standardized chart).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of orthodontic finishing - ABO Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) total score

    Total ABO-OGS score obtained on the Cast-Radiographic Evaluation (CRE) form. Seven parameters - alignment/rotations, marginal ridges, buccolingual inclination, occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, overjet, and interproximal contacts - are scored on 3D-printed casts with the ABO measuring gauge; root angulation is scored on the panoramic radiograph. Point deductions are summed to give the total score (a lower total indicates better finishing).

    Time frame: At completion of the levelling and alignment phase (T₁), after the 0.017 in × 0.025 in stainless steel arch wire has been maintained for 3 months - approximately 7 months after bonding.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anterior crown angulation (tip) - CBCT

    Change in mesiodistal crown angulation (tip) of the anterior teeth, measured in degrees on dentoalveolar CBCT using defined landmarks and reference planes.

    Time frame: Change from before bonding (T₀) to end of levelling and alignment (T₁), approximately 7 months after bonding

  2. Anterior crown inclination (torque) - CBCT

    Change in labiolingual crown inclination (torque) of the anterior teeth, measured in degrees on dentoalveolar CBCT.

    Time frame: Change from before bonding (T₀) to end of levelling and alignment (T₁), approximately 7 months after bonding

  3. Maxillary gingival display

    Change in maxillary gingival display - the vertical distance (mm) between the inferior border of the upper lip and the gingival zenith of each maxillary anterior tooth (central incisor, lateral incisor, canine, both sides) on standardized posed-smile frontal photographs, measured in Adobe Photoshop after calibration against a metric ruler.

    Time frame: Change from before bonding (T₀) to end of levelling and alignment (T₁), approximately 7 months after bonding

  4. Maxillary incisal display

    Change in maxillary incisal display - the vertical amount (mm) of maxillary incisor crown visible relative to the upper lip during a posed smile, on standardized photographs.

    Time frame: Change from before bonding (T₀) to end of levelling and alignment (T₁), approximately 7 months after bonding

  5. Buccal corridor width

    Change in buccal corridor (lateral negative space) - the linear distance (mm) between the most posterior visible maxillary tooth and the corner of the mouth during posed smile, measured on each side and averaged.

    Time frame: Change from before bonding (T₀) to end of levelling and alignment (T₁), approximately 7 months after bonding

  6. Smile arc category

    Smile arc classified as consonant, flat, or reversed based on the relationship between the curvature of the maxillary incisal/canine/premolar edges and the curvature of the lower lip during posed smile.

    Time frame: Change from before bonding (T₀) to end of levelling and alignment (T₁), approximately 7 months after bonding

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt
    New Cairo, Cairo Governorate 11835, Egypt
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Study data are stored confidentially within the Department of Orthodontics with access restricted to the investigator and supervisors; results will be disseminated through the institutional thesis repository and peer-reviewed publication.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2024 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 24 months.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Malocclusion, Angle Class I, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 24. This study's 24 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 7, 2026
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07708363
Responsible party
Hager Mansour Abdelbaseer Zoghby (Dr., Future University in Egypt) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026
Completion
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion