ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07696689EARLY-TAIUpdated Jul 10, 2026

Evaluating the Optimal Timing of Trans-Anal Irrigation for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Post-rectal Cancer Surgery

An interventional study of Water-based transanal irrigation system in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), sponsored by Simona Ascanelli. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Simona Ascanelli · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the optimal timing of trans-anal irrigation (TAI) for participants with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) who have undergone surgery for rectal cancer.

The main question it aims to answer is:

"Can starting TAI within three months of stoma closure reduce the number of daily bowel movements in people who have undergone rectal surgery?" Researchers will compare the outcomes for participants who start TAI within the first three months with those who start after three months, to see if early TAI can reduce the number of daily bowel movements more effectively than starting later.

The study will also determine whether early TAI can improve typical bowel symptoms, enhance quality of life, and increase satisfaction with treatment as much as when it is performed more than three months after stoma closure.

Participants will:

  • Undergo a preliminary visit to assess their eligibility to participate
  • Undergo training to understand how to use the device correctly
  • Perform regular TAI
  • Undergo four control visits at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months after the start of treatment.
02

Conditions studied

  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS)

Keywords

  • LARS
  • Trans-Anal Irrigation
  • Rectal Cancer
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
  • Constipation
  • Bowel movements
  • Fecal incontinence
  • TAI
  • Peristeen Plus
03

In context

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 72 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.

Browse Low Anterior Resection Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Simona Ascanelli as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged ≥ 18 years
  • Colorectal resection for rectal cancer with a protective ostomy
  • Integrity of the colorectal or coloanal anastomosis, as confirmed by each center's standard procedure
  • LARS score > 30 (major LARS)
  • Not previously treated with TAI (except for enemas)
  • Completion of training on TAI irrigation by trained medical/nursing staff
  • Use of only the Peristeen® Plus device for TAI
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological diseases
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Refusal to consent to follow-up
  • Current or planned pregnancy
  • Known allergy to latex
  • Presence of as outlined in the device's Instructions for Use (IFU), such as ischemic colitis, acute inflammatory bowel disease, or acute diverticulitis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early TAI-treated group

    This arm will start trans-anal irrigation within 3 months after stoma closure

    Device: Water-based transanal irrigation system

  • Other
    Late TAI-treated group

    This arm will begin trans-anal irrigation between three and six months after stoma closure

    Device: Water-based transanal irrigation system

Interventions

  • DeviceWater-based transanal irrigation system

    The procedure involves the introduction of water into the rectum and colon via the anus, which stimulates colonic reflex activity and acts as a mechanical bowel washout, thereby facilitating faecal evacuation. The device will deliver a controlled amount of warm water using a catheter - cone or balloon catheter - while sitting on the toilet. Once the desired amount of water has been introduced, the patient will expel the water and bowel contents. The procedure will take approximately 15-30 minutes, depending on the individual patient's response.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the effectiveness of two treatment regimens, initiated within different time frames following ostomy closure, in reducing the number of bowel movements in 24 hours.

    The difference in the change from baseline (V0) in the number of bowel movements (i.e. defecations) in 24 hours at 3 months after stoma closure (V2) between the early TAI group and the late TAI-treated group.

    Time frame: From baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of early administration of TAI in reducing the symptoms of LARS in the longterm period (up to 9 months).

    The difference in the change from baseline (V0) in the number of bowel movements in 24 hours at 6 and 9 months (V3 and V4) after stoma closure between the early TAI group and the late TAI-treated group.

    Time frame: From baseline to 9 months

  2. Efficacy of early administration of TAI in prevent LARS chronicity (prevent the increase of specific symptoms of LARS at all time points).

    The difference in the change from baseline (V0) in the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score (with a focus on the individual components of fecal urgency, incontinence, and incomplete evacuation) at various time points (V2, V3, V4) between the two groups (early TAI and late TAI-treated group). The LARS score ranges from 0 to 42 points. Patients are classified into one of three categories: no LARS (0-20 points), minor LARS (21-29 points) or major LARS (30-42 points).

    Time frame: From baseline to 9 months

  3. Efficacy of early administration of TAI improving quality of life at all time points

    Changes in quality of life (QoL) scores (across all domains of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire) from baseline (V0) at all time points (V2, V3 and V4), and an evaluation of differences between the two groups. SF-36 scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a more favourable health state.

    Time frame: From baseline to 9 months

  4. Efficacy of early administration of TAI improving patient satisfaction at all time points

    Change in patient satisfaction at all time points from baseline (V0) using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and evaluation of the differences between the two groups. The VAS consists of a 10 cm line with two endpoints representing 0 = completely unsatisfied and 10 = completely satisfied.

    Time frame: From baseline to 9 months

  5. Evaluate how various factors, such as the timing of TAI initiation, type of anastomosis, prior neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy, and other patient baseline characteristics, influence LARS symptoms

    The variation in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) scores in relation to factors such as the time at which TAI was initiated, the type of anastomosis, previous neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy, and other baseline patient characteristics in the two groups was examined. The LARS score ranges from 0 to 42 points. Patients are classified into one of three categories: no LARS (0-20 points), minor LARS (21-29 points) or major LARS (30-42 points).

    Time frame: From baseline to 9 months

Other outcomes

  1. Safety and tolerability

    Evaluation of the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), devicerelated adverse events (ADEs) and serious device-related adverse events (SADEs) in the two groups

    Time frame: From baseline to 9 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07696689
Lead sponsor
Simona Ascanelli
Responsible party
Simona Ascanelli (General Surgeon at University Hospital of Ferrara, University Hospital of Ferrara) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Simona Ascanelli Ascanelli, MD, Department of Surgery
Contact
simona.ascanelli@unife.it
+39 348 6909238

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion