ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07679646EVALECOUpdated Oct 28, 2026

Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home Telemonitoring and Non-invasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD and Hypercapnia (EVALECO)

An observational study in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD) and Hypercapnia, sponsored by Air Liquide Healthcare Spain. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Primary conditionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRegistry: Lung DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Lung Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, a narrower term within Lung Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Air Liquide Healthcare Spain (part of Air Liquide) · Observational

Updated Oct 28, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
92
Ages
50 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical efficiency of combining home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with a continuous remote telemonitoring (TM) system in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and persistent hypercapnia. In standard practice, patients with severe COPD and high carbon dioxide levels in their blood are treated with home non-invasive ventilation to support their breathing. This study compares two different care strategies over a one-year follow-up period:

  1. One group of patients will receive standard home non-invasive ventilation alone.
  2. Another group will receive home non-invasive ventilation combined with an automated telemonitoring system that tracks device parameters daily (such as air leaks, device usage, and breathing rates) and sends automated alerts to the healthcare team if deviations occur. The main goal of the project is to determine if adding a telemonitoring follow-up system can prevent clinical worsenings and significantly reduce the total number of days patients spend hospitalized due to severe COPD flare-ups. Additionally, the study will analyze the impact of both strategies on patients' overall health-related quality of life and the economic costs within the healthcare system.
Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale:

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with persistent hypercapnia is associated with increased mortality, functional decline, and high healthcare costs. While home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is established as standard care to correct chronic respiratory failure, integrating remote telemonitoring (TM) presents an opportunity to implement early clinical interventions by allowing continuous oversight of ventilator parameters.

Study Design and Setting:

This is a prospective, multicenter, comparative cohort study with an integrated economic and utility evaluation. The study will be conducted across 5 public university hospitals within the Community of Madrid, Spain. A total of 92 patients (46 patients in the NIV+TM cohort and 46 in the conventional NIV cohort).

Study Hypotheses:

  • Conceptual Hypothesis: Patients managed with the combined NIV+TM strategy experience a better clinical course than those treated with standard NIV alone.
  • Statistical Hypothesis: Patients in the NIV+TM group will experience a lower average burden of exacerbation-related hospitalizations (estimated average of 24 days over 12 months) compared to the conventional NIV group (estimated average of 32 days over 12 months), reflecting a significant reduction of 8 hospital days between both management strategies during the first year of treatment.

Description of Cohorts and Follow-up Interventions:

  • Combined Ventilation and Telemonitoring Cohort (NIV+TM): Patients receive standard advanced pressure-controlled nocturnal NIV combined with a remote data transmission modem. Clinical parameters-including device compliance, residual Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), intentional/unintentional air leaks, respiratory rate (RR), and tidal volume (Vt)-are continuously monitored. Automated alerts are prioritized by the system: Low Priority alerts are tracked during routine visits, while High Priority alerts trigger an explicit, standardized clinical decision algorithm. This algorithm mandates immediate telephone triage, home technician visits for equipment adjustments, or direct communication with the prescribing pulmonologist for parameter adjustments. Domiciliary visits and health-related quality of life assessments (EQ-5D-5L and Severe Respiratory Insufficiency [SRI] questionnaires) will be carried out at baseline, 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days.
  • Conventional Ventilation Cohort (NIV alone):

Patients receive identical advanced pressure-controlled nocturnal NIV settings but without remote data monitoring capabilities. Follow-up follows conventional guidelines based on standard clinical dependence: monthly home visits for patients requiring >12 hours/day of ventilation, or quarterly home visits for those requiring ≤12 hours/day. Compliance data, air leaks, and adaptation are checked manually during these visits. In-person follow-ups, EQ-5D-5L, and SRI assessments occur at baseline, day 30, and regular domiciliary visits, alongside mandatory arterial blood gas monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months to verify treatment efficacy.

Economic and Data Analysis:

Analytical evaluations will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Clinical outcomes, utility values (Quality-Adjusted Life Years - QALYs gained calculated via Spanish EQ-5D-5L utility weights), and direct medical/non-medical healthcare system costs (utilizing the most recent official public tariffs from the Madrid Health Service - SERMAS) will be combined. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER), Incremental Cost-Utility Ratios (ICUR), and Incremental Cost-Benefit ratios will be constructed to evaluate healthcare efficiency. Uncertainty will be addressed via a deterministic sensitivity analysis assessing baseline, best-case, and worst-case scenarios for the telemonitoring implementation.

We have updated the Study Description to remove the term 'randomly allocated' to avoid misunderstanding. This is a strictly observational study where participants receive interventions (NIV or NIV+TM) as part of routine medical care based on institutional availability and clinical criteria, not by investigator assignment. To minimize selection bias inherent to the observational nature of the study, a consecutive sampling methodology and a post-hoc matching or adjusted statistical analysis using a block-restrictive system based on clinical variables was utilized, ensuring the investigator does not prospectively assign interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD)
  • Hypercapnia

Keywords

  • Home Noninvasive Ventilation
  • Telemonitoring
  • Respiratory Insufficiency
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Reclassified

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 92 is below the median of 158 across 1,497 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Air Liquide Healthcare Spain is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Compared within Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Lung Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients diagnosed with severe, stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and chronic persistent hypercapnia, who are managed and followed at public university hospitals within the Community of Madrid, Spain, and who have a recent history of frequent acute respiratory exacerbations.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between 50 and 90 years.
  2. Confirmed diagnosis of (COPD) according to current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria, demonstrating non-fully reversible airflow limitation with a (FEV1) \< 50% of the predicted value confirmed by spirometry.
  3. Persistent hypercapnia, defined as PaCO2 > 53 mmHg documented for at least two weeks following an acute COPD exacerbation.
  4. History of two or more acute COPD exacerbations within the preceding year.
  5. Signed written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior ongoing treatment with home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP).
  2. Severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), defined as an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) >= 30.
  3. Inability of the patient or the primary caregiver to comprehend or operate the telemonitoring and NIV procedures.
  4. Estimated of less than one year.
  5. Terminal heart failure ( [NYHA] Class III-IV) or unstable angina.
  6. Advanced renal insufficiency ( \< 30%) or inclusion in an active dialysis program.
  7. Hepatic cirrhosis or active inclusion in a liver transplant program.
  8. Severe psychiatric illness requiring antipsychotic medication, active ongoing treatment for substance or alcohol addiction, or lack of a fixed home address upon hospital discharge.
  9. Receipt of home palliative care.
  10. Institutionalization.
  11. Classification by the attending physician as non-compliant with medical therapies, treatments, or study protocols
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
92 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • NIV+TM Cohort

    Patients managed with a combined strategy consisting of advanced pressure-controlled nocturnal home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and continuous remote telemonitoring (TM). Device compliance, residual Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), air leaks, respiratory rate, and tidal volume are monitored daily. High-priority automated alerts trigger a standardized clinical decision algorithm, requiring immediate telephone triage or parameter modifications.

    Device: Home Non-Invasive Ventilation and Telemonitoring

  • Conventional NIV Cohort

    Patients managed with conventional home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) following standard follow-up guidelines based on clinical dependence, without remote telemonitoring or automatic alert systems. Compliance and leak data are verified manually during scheduled domiciliary visits (monthly or quarterly depending on daily ventilation hours).

Interventions

  • DeviceHome Non-Invasive Ventilation and Telemonitoring

    Use of nocturnal home non-invasive ventilation devices equipped with or without integrated digital modems for automated parameter monitoring (compliance, leaks, residual AHI, respiratory rate, and tidal volume) over a 12-month follow-up period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of prevented days of hospitalization due to COPD acute exacerbations

    The total number of days a patient spends hospitalized in a general hospital ward or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). An acute exacerbation is defined according to GOLD criteria as an increase in dyspnea, cough, and/or sputum worsening in less than 14 days.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-Related Quality of Life and Utility (QALYs)

    Measured using the validated Spanish version of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. It evaluates 2 continuous components: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, scored 0-100) and the EQ-Index (scored 0-1, where 1 represents perfect health and 0 represents death). These scores will be utilized to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained.

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, and 365 days.

  2. Number of Acute COPD Exacerbations

    Total count of localized respiratory worsening events matching the GOLD definition (worsening of dyspnea, cough, or sputum) experienced by patients during the study.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of Hospital Admissions due to COPD Exacerbations

    Total number of formal hospital admissions required due to severe acute respiratory deteriorations.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of Emergency Department Visit

    Total count of unexpected visits to hospital emergency rooms or primary care emergency facilities necessitated by acute COPD flare-ups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Time to first acute COPD exacerbation

    The specific time period (measured in days) elapsed from the baseline treatment initiation until the documentation of the patient's first acute COPD exacerbation event.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  6. Direct Healthcare Costs

    Total direct medical and non-medical healthcare resources consumed per patient (including non-invasive ventilation service costs, telemonitoring setup, emergency visits, and hospitalization days in regular wards or ICU), calculated by applying official public healthcare tariffs from the Madrid Health Service (SERMAS).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared externally due to strict patient confidentiality, data privacy, and legal regulations. In compliance with Spanish Organic Law 3/2018 (GDPR implementation) and the Patient Autonomy Law 41/2002, the link between patient identity and their study code is exclusively known and held by their attending physician[cite: 660, 685, 690, 691]. All clinical data collected are managed within a closed, pseudonymized centralized electronic platform (ReseaArch®) under a strict role-based access control architecture. External distribution of raw individual datasets is neither covered by the patient informed consent nor approved by the participating institutional ethics committees.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026→Dec 2026
Oct 28, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2026→Dec 2026
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    Start date Jul 2026→Dec 2026
    Primary completion Jul 2026→Dec 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07679646
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Daniel López Padilla, MD, PhD
Contact
danieleduardo.lopez@salud.madrid.org
91 586 83 28

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion