ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07069829iCHOROSUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Study of Clinical and Patient-reported Outcomes in Adults With Moderate to Severe COPD Treated With Breztri/Trixeo

An observational study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Recruiting at 36 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Nov 10, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,400
Ages
30 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Exacerbations accelerate disease progression and increase the risk of death. Recent recommendations from the GOLD report emphasize the diagnosis of COPD and treatment planning based on a combination of lung function metrics, exacerbation history, and patient-reported symptoms. It is recommending the use of triple combination therapy (ICS+LABA+LAMA) such as BREZTRI/TRIXEO as one of the options in Group E patients. While BGF has demonstrated efficacy in controlled clinical trials, real-world evidence is needed to assess its impact on daily patient outcomes and quality of life.

The iCHOROS study is a real-world, international, multicenter, observational study aiming to evaluate changes in clinical and patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe COPD treated with BGF for 12 months in routine care settings across Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East \& Africa. The study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and patient experience of BGF therapy in diverse, real-world populations

Read the detailed description

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease poses a major health challenge globally and is currently the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in approximately 3.23 million deaths annually. The impact of COPD is particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries where healthcare resources may be limited. COPD is characterized by a progressive decline in lung function, frequent exacerbations, and high morbidity and mortality rates. Exacerbations, which are acute worsening events of respiratory symptoms, play a critical role in disease progression. Hospitalized severe exacerbations markedly increase the risk of further exacerbations, a rapid decline in health status, and high short-term mortality rates. Roughly 20% of patients at GOLD stage 2 experience frequent exacerbations necessitating additional interventions, with risk increasing in GOLD stages 3 and 4.

Recent clinical guidelines from the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) emphasize a multidimensional assessment, incorporating lung function, prior exacerbation history, and patient-reported symptoms to guide treatment. The overall goal of COPD pharmacologic therapy is to reduce symptoms (including dyspnea), prevent exacerbations, improve exercise tolerance, and enhance quality of life. Triple inhaled therapy, consisting of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), is recommended for patients in GOLD Group E who continue to experience exacerbations despite dual therapy. This approach has demonstrated beneficial effect in reducing mortality among high-risk, symptomatic COPD patients.

Breztri/Trixeo (BGF) is a fixed-dose triple combination of budesonide (ICS), glycopyrrolate (LAMA), and formoterol fumarate (LABA), administered via a metered dose inhaler utilizing Aerosphere™ delivery technology. BGF received regulatory approval from the FDA in July 2020 and the EMA in December 2020, based on phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that established its efficacy in improving lung function and reducing moderate/severe exacerbations. These trials primarily measured lung function and exacerbation rates and also included secondary endpoints evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Despite these findings, there is a need for real-world evidence (RWE) to better understand the effectiveness, safety, and patient experience of BGF outside the controlled environment of RCTs.

The importance of capturing PROs-such as the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (m-MRC) dyspnea scale-in both clinical trials and real-world studies is increasingly recognized in the literature and reflected in current GOLD recommendations. Observational, patient-centric studies in routine clinical practice can provide complementary insights to RCTs, particularly through direct and timely collection of PRO data. Such studies elucidate the real-life impact of COPD and its management on daily patient functioning and quality of life and are valuable to healthcare payers, practitioners, and patients themselves.

To address gaps in population diversity of earlier RCTs and to better understand the use of BGF in routine medical practice, the iCHOROS study is a non-interventional, prospective, multinational, multicenter observational cohort study designed to document clinical and patient-reported outcomes in COPD patients initiated on BGF. The study includes patients from diverse and often underrepresented regions, such as Latin America (Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Central America and Caribbean, Costa Rica, Panama), Asia (Taiwan, Philippines, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand), and the Middle East and Africa (KSA, Kuwait, UAE, Egypt, Jordan). This design supports the collection of more generalizable and globally relevant data.

The primary objective of this study is to estimate the change in COPD health status using the mean change from baseline in CAT score after 12 weeks of BGF treatment. Secondary objectives include evaluating CAT score changes at weeks 26 and 52, determining the proportion of CAT responders at week 12, comparing moderate and severe exacerbation rates before and after BGF initiation, and describing patient satisfaction with inhaler devices across all visits. Additional endpoints include global impression of change and severity (PGI-C, PGI-S), BGF treatment patterns and reasons for discontinuation, changes in m-MRC score and spirometry parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC), as well as exploratory assessments of baseline clinical characteristics and cardiovascular events.

In accordance with real-world clinical practice, patient follow-up visits will occur at baseline, week 12, week 26, and week 52, with all treatments and diagnostic evaluations determined solely by the attending physician and local guidelines. Patients' demographics, vital signs, medical and exacerbation history, and medication use will be recorded at baseline. The decision to initiate BGF and all management is entirely at the physician's discretion, separate from study participation or informed consent. Study participation will cease upon discontinuation of BGF. The data collection is hybrid, using existing medical records and primary data from scheduled visits without altering the standard of care or providing investigational medication. The total duration for each patient is 52 weeks or until discontinuation of BGF, and the overall study timeframe is estimated at 21 months, including interim analyses for CAT score and exacerbation rate results as more than half the population reaches key visits. Overall, the iCHOROS study aims to comprehensively characterize real-world clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with BGF, thus supporting better clinical decisions and patient-centered care for COPD worldwide.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Severe Exacerbations
  • BGF - Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,400 is above the median of 158 across 1,497 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,499 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 368 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study plans to enroll approximately 1,400 patients, accounting for an expected dropout rate or missing data of \~20%, to ensure that at least 1,120 patients complete the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

The study will include patients who were prescribed BGF, but not yet initiated, according to the label (SmPC) and local market reimbursement criteria. Patients will only be included in the study if they meet the following inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with , at least 12 months before baseline, as assessed per physician's routine practice or as documented in the patient's chart.
  2. Male or female patients aged over 30 years and under 80 years at the time of enrolment.
  3. Patients providing a written * prior to inclusion to the study.

    *Prescription of BGF should be prior to the signed informed consent and the decision to prescribe this therapy is clearly separated from the physician's decision to include the patient in the current study.

  4. Patients able and willing to read and to comprehend written instructions, and to comprehend and complete the questionnaires required by the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to participate in the study:

  1. Patients with due to documented α-1 antitrypsin deficiency.
  2. Patients with recent (≤3 months) major cardiac or pulmonary events that required hospitalization (e.g., myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism).
  3. Patients previously treated with triple fixed-dose combination therapies 12 months before the screening visit or treated with Multiple Inhaled Triple Therapy (MITT) within the last 3 months before the screening visit.
  4. Patients hospitalized due to COPD exacerbations within the last 30 days prior to enrolment.
  5. Currently pregnant (or intending to become pregnant), breastfeeding, or lactating women.
  6. Patients with a current diagnosis of asthma, active tuberculosis, lung cancer or lung , significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases, or other active pulmonary diseases.
  7. Patients currently participating in a non-interventional observational trial that might, in the investigator's opinion, influence the assessment for the current study or participation in any interventional trial in the last 30 days prior to enrolment.
  8. Patients with respiratory tract infection (including COVID-19 infection) ) that has not resolved ≤30 days prior to BGF MDI initiation and those exhibiting persistent long-COVID symptoms are excluded from the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change from baseline in the COPD Assessment Test

    Mean change from baseline in the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores after 12 weeks from treatment initiation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. CAT scores

    Mean change from baseline in CAT scores after 26 weeks of treatment

    Time frame: 26 Weeks

  2. CAT scores

    Mean change from baseline in CAT scores after 52 weeks of treatment

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  3. CAT scores

    Percent of responders of the CAT achieving MCID ≥ 2 after 12 weeks of treatment compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. TSQM - 9 Score

    IQVIA Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)© scores at baseline

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. TSQM - 9 Score

    IQVIA Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)© scores at 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. TSQM - 9 Score

    IQVIA Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)© scores at 26 weeks

    Time frame: 26 Weeks

  7. TSQM - 9 Score

    IQVIA Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9)© scores at 52 weeks.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  8. PGI-C Scale

    Mean change from baseline in patient global impression of change (PGI-C) after 52 weeks from treatment initiation

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  9. PGI-S Scale

    Mean change from baseline in COPD symptoms severity using the patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) after 12 weeks from treatment initiation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. PGI-S Scale

    Mean change from baseline in COPD symptoms severity using the patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) after 26 weeks from treatment initiation

    Time frame: 26 Weeks

  11. PGI-S Scale

    Mean change from baseline in COPD symptoms severity using the patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) after 52 weeks from treatment initiation

    Time frame: 52 Weeks

  12. mMRC dyspnoea score

    Mean change from baseline in mMRC dyspnoea score after 12 weeks from treatment initiation.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  13. mMRC dyspnoea score

    Mean change from baseline in mMRC dyspnoea score (Appendix 6) after 26 weeks from treatment initiation.

    Time frame: 26 Weeks

  14. mMRC dyspnoea score

    Mean change from baseline in mMRC dyspnoea score (Appendix 6) after 52 weeks from treatment initiation.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Study locations

19 of 36 sites recruiting
  • Research Site
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    La Plata, Argentina
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Mendoza, Argentina
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Medell N, Colombia, Colombia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Barranquilla, Colombia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Rionegro, Colombia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Alexandria, Egypt
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Cairo, Egypt
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Cairo, Egypt
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Jawa Barat, Indonesia, Indonesia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Amman, Jordan
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    George Town, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Kuala Selangor, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Kuching, Malaysia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Malacca, Malaysia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Guadalajara, Mexico
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Monterrey, Mexico
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Abhā, Saudi Arabia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Yunlin, Taiwan, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Taichung, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Tainan, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Nonthaburi, Thailand
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Not yet recruiting
  • Research Site
    Hà Nội, Vietnam, Vietnam
    Recruiting
  • Research Site
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

Time frame: AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Access criteria: When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Data sharing details ↗ · astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027→Dec 31, 2027
Nov 10, 2026
Study completion
Sep 30, 2027→Dec 31, 2027
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 30, 2027→Dec 31, 2027
    Study completion Sep 30, 2027→Dec 31, 2027
    + 2 other changes: verification date and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07069829
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2025
Start date
Dec 15, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
Contact
information.center@astrazeneca.com
1-877-240-9479

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion