CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07677228TELEROCUpdated Jun 30, 2026

Telerehabilitation Versus Home-Based Jaw Exercises in Temporomandibular Disorder With Bruxism

An interventional study of Telerehabilitation-based Rocabado exercises and Home-based Rocabado exercises in Temporomandibular Disorders, Bruxism, sponsored by Mehmet Turgut. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by Mehmet Turgut · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study looked at whether jaw exercises (the Rocabado exercise programme) work better when delivered through supervised online video sessions than when done at home with written instructions alone, in adults who have jaw-joint pain (temporomandibular disorder) together with teeth grinding (bruxism). Thirty adults were randomly placed into one of two groups. Both groups were taught the same exercises and asked to do them twice a day for four weeks. One group also took part in supervised video sessions three times a week, where a physiotherapist watched their exercises and gave feedback; the other group used printed exercise leaflets with weekly text-message reminders. The researchers measured jaw pain, how wide participants could open their mouth, jaw movement, stress, sleep quality and oral habits before treatment, after two weeks and after four weeks, to see which approach gave better results.

Read the detailed description

This single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University. Participants who met the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for myofascial temporomandibular disorder with concurrent bruxism were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated simple randomisation sequence. Allocation was concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes that were opened only after enrolment. The outcome assessor was blinded to group allocation; participants were not blinded owing to the nature of the intervention. Both groups received identical initial face-to-face training in the Rocabado 6×6 exercise programme and were instructed to perform the exercises twice daily for four weeks. The telerehabilitation group additionally received supervised video sessions, whereas the comparator group followed the programme at home with printed materials and reminders only. Assessments were performed in person at baseline, at week 2 (mid-treatment) and at week 4 (post-treatment). The sample size was estimated using G*Power, and data were analysed with within-group and between-group statistical comparisons.

02

Conditions studied

  • Temporomandibular Disorders, Bruxism

Keywords

  • Telerehabilitation, Temporomandibular disorders, Bruxism, Rocabado exercises, Myofascial pain, Exercise therapy, Telemedicine, Physiotherap
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-60 years
  • Diagnosis of myofascial temporomandibular disorder (TMD) with bruxism according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD)
  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 3
  • No medical treatment for TMD in the preceding 6 months
  • Access to a smartphone with internet connectivity
  • Turkish literacy and communication ability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active orthodontic or splint treatment
  • History of temporomandibular joint surgery
  • Systemic inflammatory disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Major psychiatric disorders
  • Neurological deficits in the cervical region
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telerehabilitation group

    Participants received supervised Rocabado 6×6 exercise training through video sessions delivered via WhatsApp three times per week, with real-time physiotherapist feedback, in addition to performing the Rocabado exercises at home twice daily for four weeks.

    Behavioral: Telerehabilitation-based Rocabado exercises

  • Active comparator
    Home exercise group

    Participants performed the same Rocabado 6×6 exercise programme at home twice daily for four weeks, supported by printed exercise brochures and weekly SMS reminders, without supervised video sessions.

    Behavioral: Home-based Rocabado exercises

Interventions

  • BehavioralTelerehabilitation-based Rocabado exercises

    Supervised Rocabado 6×6 exercise programme delivered through video sessions via WhatsApp three times per week, with real-time physiotherapist feedback on exercise performance and technique, performed in addition to twice-daily home Rocabado exercises for four weeks.

  • BehavioralHome-based Rocabado exercises

    Rocabado 6×6 exercise programme performed at home twice daily for four weeks, supported by printed exercise brochures and weekly SMS reminders, without supervised video sessions or physiotherapist feedback.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), scored from 0 to 10 cm, for morning pain, pain during chewing (mastication) and night pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 2 (mid-treatment) and week 4 (post-treatment)

  2. Maximum mouth opening

    Maximum mouth opening measured in millimetres using a digital calliper (Mitutoyo, Japan); the mean of three consecutive measurements was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 2 (mid-treatment) and week 4 (post-treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Temporomandibular joint range of motion

    Active and passive maximum mouth opening, right and left lateral movements, and protrusion measured in millimetres using a digital calliper (Mitutoyo, Japan).

    Time frame: Baseline, week 2 (mid-treatment) and week 4 (post-treatment)

  2. TMD severity (Fonseca Anamnestic Index)

    Severity of temporomandibular disorder assessed using the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (0-100 points); higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4 (post-treatment)

  3. Perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale)

    Perceived stress assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), scored from 0 to 40; higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4 (post-treatment)

  4. Sleep quality (Jenkins Sleep Scale)

    Sleep quality assessed using the Jenkins Sleep Scale, scored from 0 to 20; higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4 (post-treatment)

  5. Oral parafunctional habits (Oral Behaviours Checklist)

    Oral parafunctional habits assessed using the Oral Behaviours Checklist (OBC), scored from 0 to 40; higher scores indicate more frequent oral parafunctional behaviours.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4 (post-treatment)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Faculty of Dentistry
    Nevşehir, Nevşehir Province 50300, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Turgut T. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based Rocabado exercises compared to home-based Rocabado exercises in myofascial temporomandibular dysfunctions accompanied by bruxism [master's thesis]. Nevşehir: Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University; 2024.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not made publicly available. De-identified data generated and analysed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approval.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07677228
Lead sponsor
Mehmet Turgut
Responsible party
Mehmet Turgut (Prof. Dr. Mehmet Turgut, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 30, 2026
Start date
Dec 15, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2024
Completion
Jul 20, 2024
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Study contacts

Taha Turgut, Msc. PT.
principal investigator · Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University
Mehmet Turgut
principal investigator · Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University
Nevin Ergun
study director · Sanko University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion