ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07911358TMJ-IDUpdated Nov 2, 2026

Comparing Dextrose Prolotherapy vs. Sodium Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Jaw Joint Internal Derangement

An interventional study of Dextrose Prolotherapy and Sodium Hyaluronic Acid in Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement, TMJ-ID and TMPDS, sponsored by Allama Iqbal Medical College. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Allama Iqbal Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of two intra-articular injections for the management of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) internal derangement. The study compares Dextrose Prolotherapy (12.5%) versus Sodium Hyaluronic Acid. Sixty patients (30 per group) with clinically diagnosed TMJ internal derangement (Wilkes Stage II or III) who have not responded to conservative treatment will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a single 1ml intra-articular injection of Dextrose or Sodium Hyaluronic Acid into the superior joint space. The primary outcomes are the mean change in pain intensity (measured on a Visual Analogue Scale) and Maximum Inter-Incisal Opening (measured in millimeters) at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-injection.

Read the detailed description

Background: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangement is a common disorder characterized by an abnormal positional relationship between the articular disc, condyle, and articular eminence. It affects 10-25% of individuals, predominantly middle-aged females. Treatment follows a stepwise approach, starting with conservative care (occlusal splints, pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy) and moving to minimally invasive intra-articular injections for refractory cases. Dextrose prolotherapy stimulates tissue repair through a controlled inflammatory response, while Sodium Hyaluronic Acid acts as a viscosupplement to restore joint lubrication and homeostasis. Current literature lacks sufficient direct comparisons between these two agents.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of dextrose prolotherapy versus sodium hyaluronic acid injection in terms of pain intensity and maximum mouth opening in patients with TMJ internal derangement.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Jinnah Hospital Lahore, over a period of 6 months after synopsis approval. A total of 60 patients (30 in each group) aged 18-50 years with clinically diagnosed TMJ internal derangement (Wilkes Stage II or III) who have not improved with conservative treatment over 3 months will be enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients will be randomized via a random number table into Group A (receiving 1ml intra-articular injection of 12.5% Dextrose) or Group B (receiving 1ml intra-articular injection of Sodium Hyaluronate). Pain intensity (VAS) and Maximum Inter-Incisal Opening (MIO) will be recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Post-stratification t-test will be applied, and a p-value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Expected Outcome: This study will provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice in Pakistan regarding the therapeutic equivalence of these two injection modalities for TMJ internal derangement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement
  • TMJ-ID
  • TMPDS
  • Disc Displacement
  • Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Keywords

  • Temporomandibular Joint
  • Internal Derangement
  • Dextrose Prolotherapy
  • Sodium Hyaluronic Acid
  • Viscosupplementation
  • TMJ-ID
  • TMJ
  • TMPDS
  • Intra-Articular Injections
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • prolotherapy
  • Minimally Invasive
03

In context

Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome

416 studies on the registry are indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 45 across 301 interventional studies indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome.

Browse Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Allama Iqbal Medical College is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Consenting adults (18-50 years of age) of both genders reporting to the department for treatment of clinically proven Temporomandibular joint internal derangement.

  • Patients having no improvement with conservative treatment (medications, occlusal splints) over a period of 3 months.
  • Patients specifically diagnosed with Wilkes Stage II (early/reducible) or Stage III (intermediate/non-reducible) internal derangement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any co-morbid condition e.g. Uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, ischemic Heart disease, epilepsy etc.
  • Patients with pregnancy and lactating mothers.
  • Patients suffering from autoimmune diseases (pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigoid, lupus erythematosus, sjogren syndrome).
  • Patients with immunocompromised/systemic conditions.
  • A known allergy to sodium hyaluronate, dextrose, or local anesthesia.
  • Active inflammation or infection at the proposed injection site.
  • History of previous TMJ surgery on the affected joint.
  • Temporomandibular joint disorder patients with myofascial pain (without internal derangement).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Dextrose Prolotherapy

    Participants will receive a single 1ml intra-articular injection of 12.5% Dextrose Prolotherapy (prepared by mixing 0.5ml of 25% dextrose with 0.5ml of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine) into the superior joint space of the affected TMJ.

    Drug: Dextrose Prolotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Sodium Hyaluronic Acid

    Participants will receive a single 1ml intra-articular injection of high molecular weight, non-cross-linked Sodium Hyaluronate into the superior joint space of the affected TMJ.

    Drug: Sodium Hyaluronic Acid

Interventions

  • 12.5% Dextrose solution (0.5ml 25% dextrose + 0.5ml 2% lidocaine) injected into the superior joint space

  • DrugSodium Hyaluronic Acid

    1ml of high molecular weight, non-cross-linked Sodium Hyaluronate injected into the superior joint space.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Pain Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Change in pain intensity after dextrose or hyaluronic acid injection at 1 month and 3 months from baseline, measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-injection

  2. Maximum Inter-Incisal Opening (MIO)

    Change in maximum mouth opening measured in millimeters between the upper and lower central incisors during unassisted mouth opening using a calibrated measuring ruler.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-injection

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Giraddi GB, Siddaraju A, Kumar B, Singh C. Internal derangement of temporomandibular joint: an evaluation of effect of corticosteroid injection compared with injection of sodium hyaluronate after arthrocentesis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Sep;11(3):258-63. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0324-8. Epub 2011 Dec 28. PubMed 23997474 ↗
  • Park JS, Ku JK, Kim YK, Yun PY. Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy on temporomandibular disorder: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Oct 31;50(5):259-264. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.5.259. PubMed 39482101 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality and institutional ethical restrictions. Data will be reported only in aggregate form in the final publication.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jan 2028, 12 months later.

Of 150 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 20. This study's planned 12 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 151 studies reached it within 9 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 18.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 25, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 25, 2028
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07911358
Lead sponsor
Allama Iqbal Medical College
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 25, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Aroub Rizwan, BDS
Contact
aroubrizwan15@gmail.com
03494883138
Dr.Gulraiz Zulfiqar
study chair · Allama Iqbal Medical College,Lahore
Dr.Aroub Rizwan
principal investigator · Allama Iqbal Medical College,Lahore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Glucose

Start the discussion