ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07676552RICPBUpdated Jul 2, 2026

Rectointercostal Plane Block (RICPB) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An interventional study of Rectointercostal Plane Block and Port-Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Cholelithiasis and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Koç University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by Koç University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rectointercostal plane block (RICPB) in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients will be randomized to receive unilateral right-sided RICPB at the end of surgery. Postoperative opioid consumption, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and postoperative complications will be assessed to determine the effectiveness of RICPB in postoperative pain management.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed abdominal surgical procedures. Although it is considered a minimally invasive technique, patients frequently experience moderate postoperative pain resulting from trocar insertion sites, surgical manipulation, and irritation of the abdominal wall and peritoneum. Effective postoperative pain management is essential to facilitate early mobilization, improve patient comfort, reduce opioid consumption, and enhance recovery.

The rectointercostal plane block (RICPB) is an ultrasound-guided fascial plane block that has recently emerged as a potential analgesic technique for upper abdominal surgery. By depositing local anesthetic between the rectus abdominis muscle and the costal cartilages/intercostal muscles, RICPB may provide analgesia to the anterior upper abdominal wall. However, evidence regarding its effectiveness in laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains limited.

This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rectointercostal plane block in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eligible patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the RICPB group or the control group.

Patients assigned to the RICPB group will receive an ultrasound-guided unilateral right-sided rectointercostal plane block with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia. Patients in the control group will receive conventional port-site local anesthetic infiltration according to institutional practice. All patients will undergo a standardized general anesthesia protocol and receive the same multimodal postoperative analgesic regimen.

Postoperative pain assessments will be performed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Opioid consumption, pain scores and postoperative complications, including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), will be recorded during the first 24 postoperative hours.

The primary outcome of the study is cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include postoperative NRS pain scores, rescue analgesic requirements, and the incidence of postoperative complications. The study aims to determine whether ultrasound-guided rectointercostal plane block provides superior postoperative analgesia compared with conventional port-site local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Rectointercostal Plane Block
  • RICPB
03

In context

Cholelithiasis

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholelithiasis; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 135 interventional studies indexed under Cholelithiasis.

Browse Cholelithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Koç University is the lead sponsor of 109 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • (BMI) between 18 and 35 kg/m²
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide
  • Known allergy or to local anesthetics, opioids, or study medications
  • Chronic opioid use or chronic pain syndrome
  • Coagulation disorders or ongoing anticoagulant therapy
  • Infection at the planned injection site
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to communicate pain scores
  • Severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, or respiratory disease judged by the investigator to interfere with study participation
  • Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery
  • Previous upper abdominal surgery that may interfere with the block technique or pain assessment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RICPB Group

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided unilateral right-sided rectointercostal plane block (RICPB) with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia.

    Procedure: Rectointercostal Plane Block

  • Active comparator
    Port-Site Infiltration Group

    Participants will receive conventional port-site local anesthetic infiltration at the end of surgery according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Port-Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration

Interventions

  • ProcedureRectointercostal Plane Block

    Ultrasound-guided unilateral right-sided rectointercostal plane block (RICPB) will be performed at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the rectointercostal plane under ultrasound guidance.

    Also known as: RICPB

  • ProcedurePort-Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration

    Conventional port-site local anesthetic infiltration will be performed at the end of surgery according to the study protocol to provide postoperative analgesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Postoperative Morphine Consumption

    Total morphine consumption administered via patient-controlled analgesia during the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Scores

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) at predefined postoperative time points. NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours

  2. Rescue Analgesic Requirement

    The requirement for rescue analgesia during the first 24 postoperative hours will be recorded. Rescue analgesia will be administered according to the study protocol when the NRS pain score is 4 or higher.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

  3. Postoperative Complications

    The incidence of postoperative complications, including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, respiratory complications, and other adverse events occurring during the postoperative period, will be recorded.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mendes E, Gokkaya Z, Halis A, Uymaz DS, Gurkan Y. Rectointercostal plane block for postoperative analgesia in preperitoneal enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a new indication area. Minerva Anestesiol. 2026 Jun;92(6):635-637. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19781-2. Epub 2026 Jan 27. No abstract available. PubMed 41591374 ↗
  • Mendes E, Yaylak D, Sincer Y, Uymaz DS, Gurkan Y. Rectointercostal Fascial Plane Block as a Practical Option for Somatic Analgesia in Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2025 Nov 10;19(11):e02100. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000002100. eCollection 2025 Nov 1. PubMed 41212719 ↗
  • Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Tulgar S. The recto-intercostal fascial plane block: An anatomically grounded solution for upper abdominal analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2026 Apr;70(4):601-603. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1248_25. Epub 2026 Apr 20. No abstract available. PubMed 42145288 ↗
  • Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Alver S, Sakul BU, Ansen G, Pence KB, Alici HA. Recto-intercostal fascial plane block: Another novel fascial plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111163. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111163. Epub 2023 Jun 7. No abstract available. PubMed 37295124 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 6 months later.

Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cholelithiasis, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 24, 2026
First posted
Jun 30, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
Last update
Jul 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07676552
Lead sponsor
Koç University
Responsible party
Ergün Mendes (Associate Professor, Koç University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 30, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Ergun Mendes, MD
Contact
emendes@kuh.ku.edu.tr
+905514265012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion