ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06113419CHISPAUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis

An interventional study of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Acute Pancreatitis and Cholelithiasis, sponsored by Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi. Recruiting at 2 sites in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Updated Oct 22, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare outcomes for interval or early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • To establish whether there is a difference in surgical outcomes comparing patients diagnosed with severe or moderately severe pancreatitis on which early cholecystectomy was performed versus performing interval cholecystectomy.
  • The primary endpoint will be to evaluate major complications, defined as a Clavien-Dindo score greater than or equal to III/V.
  • Secondary endpoints include evaluating minor complications (defined as a Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), biliary disease recurrence, mortality, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative admittance into an intensive care unit.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either group: early cholecystectomy during the pancreatitis hospitalization or interval cholecystectomy scheduled 4 weeks after clinical resolution of pancreatitis.

Read the detailed description

CHISPA is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial. An intention- to-treat analysis will be performed. It seeks to evaluate differences between patients taken to early cholecystectomy during hospital admission (72 hours after randomization) versus delayed cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization). Primary endpoint is major complications associated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy defined as a Clavien-Dindo score of over III/V during the first 90 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints include recurrence of biliary disease, mortality, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo score below III/V), days of postoperative hospital stay, and days admitted in an intensive care unit postoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Pancreatitis
  • Cholelithiasis

Keywords

  • cholecystectomy
  • Acute Pancreatitis
  • Cholelithiasis
03

In context

Pancreatitis

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 134 is above the median of 100 across 349 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years, diagnosis of pancreatitis according to Atlanta guidelines, moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (APACHE score ≥8 on admittance)
  • Biliary pancreatitis diagnosed on imaging (be it ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and/or tomography)
  • Recovery of pancreatitis by tolerance of oral intake (defined as 24 hours of food consumption of any consistency without emetic episodes and pain defined as 4/10 on the visual analogue score of pain) and written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of cholecystectomy
  • Planned open cholecystectomy
  • Pancreatitis-associated complication before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (compartment syndrome, bleeding and/or need for peripancreatic collection drainage)
  • Chronic pancreatitis,
  • More than one episode of pancreatitis
  • Active malignant disease
  • Septic shock
  • Choledocholithiasis not resolved by ERCP, post-ERCP perforation and post-ERCP concomitant pancreatitis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
134 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early cholecystectomy

    Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours after randomization)

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Active comparator
    Interval cholecystectomy

    Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (30 +/- 5 days after randomization).

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed using the standard American 4-port technique, insufflation will be achieved using CO2 to 15mmHg of pressure. Calot's triangle will be dissected until the critical view of safety is reached, being careful to dissect above the R4U line. After reaching the critical view of safety, two proximal and one distal clip will be placed on both the cystic conduct and artery separately, cutting the clips and then dissecting the gallbladder in a cystfundic direction. When the critical view of safety is not reached, the surgeon may perform a fundus-first cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative cholangiography or cholecystostomy to their own discretion. It will also be the surgeon's criteria to employ or not a drain system in the surgical site. The decision for theses interventions will be taken intraoperatively and will be according to findings during the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major complications (rates)

    Clavien-Dindo score III in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Major complications (rates)

    Clavien-Dindo score IV in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Major complications (rates)

    Clavien-Dindo score V in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence (rates)

    Biliary disease recurrence defined as a new admission for recurrent pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, need fro ERCP or biliary colic previous to the surgical procedure until 90 postoperative days after it

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Mortality (rates)

    Determine differences in mortality between patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Postoperative hospital stay length (days; median)

    Compare differences in postoperative hospital stay length (general) in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Minor complications (rates)

    Clavien-Dindo score I-II in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Postoperative stay length in the ICU (days; median)

    Compare differences in postoperative stay length in the ICU in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis of biliary origin taken to early vs interval cholecystectomy

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25. PubMed 23100216 ↗
  • Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Isaji S, Wada K, Itoi T, Sata N, Gabata T, Igarashi H, Kataoka K, Hirota M, Kadoya M, Kitamura N, Kimura Y, Kiriyama S, Shirai K, Hattori T, Takeda K, Takeyama Y, Hirota M, Sekimoto M, Shikata S, Arata S, Hirata K. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Jun;22(6):405-32. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.259. Epub 2015 May 13. PubMed 25973947 ↗
  • Leppaniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A, Segovia-Lohse H, Gamberini E, Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG, Parry N, Sartelli M, Wolbrink D, van Goor H, Baiocchi G, Ansaloni L, Biffl W, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Kluger Y, Moore E, Catena F. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Jun 13;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0247-0. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31210778 ↗
  • Prasanth J, Prasad M, Mahapatra SJ, Krishna A, Prakash O, Garg PK, Bansal VK. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Surg. 2022 Jun;46(6):1359-1375. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06501-4. Epub 2022 Mar 19. PubMed 35306590 ↗
  • Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1972-1981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505202. PubMed 27959604 ↗
  • Nealon WH, Bawduniak J, Walser EM. Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections. Ann Surg. 2004 Jun;239(6):741-9; discussion 749-51. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000128688.97556.94. PubMed 15166953 ↗
  • Ackermann TG, Cashin PA, Alwan M, Wewelwala CC, Tan D, Vu AN, Bowers KA, Berry R, Croagh DG. The Role of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Severe and/or Necrotic Pancreatitis in the Setting of Modern Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Pancreas. 2020 Aug;49(7):935-940. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001601. PubMed 32658078 ↗
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗
  • Gupta V, Jain G. Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):62-84. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.62. PubMed 30842813 ↗
  • Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4 Suppl 2):e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063. PubMed 24054878 ↗
  • Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30. PubMed 23896955 ↗
  • Li J, Chen J, Tang W. The consensus of integrative diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis-2017. J Evid Based Med. 2019 Feb;12(1):76-88. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12342. PubMed 30806495 ↗
  • Sun W, An LY, Bao XD, Qi YX, Yang T, Li R, Zheng SY, Sun DL. Consensus and controversy among severe pancreatitis surgery guidelines: a guideline evaluation based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Gland Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):1551-1563. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-444. PubMed 33224831 ↗
  • Hughes DL, Morris-Stiff G. Determining the optimal time interval for cholecystectomy in moderate to severe gallstone pancreatitis: A systematic review of published evidence. Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.016. Epub 2020 Nov 20. PubMed 33227531 ↗
  • da Costa DW, Bouwense SA, Schepers NJ, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Boermeester MA, Bruno MJ, van Eijck CH, Timmer R, Weusten BL, Consten EC, Brink MA, Spanier BWM, Bilgen EJS, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Hofker HS, Rosman C, Voorburg AM, Bosscha K, van Duijvendijk P, Gerritsen JJ, Heisterkamp J, de Hingh IH, Witteman BJ, Kruyt PM, Scheepers JJ, Molenaar IQ, Schaapherder AF, Manusama ER, van der Waaij LA, van Unen J, Dijkgraaf MG, van Ramshorst B, Gooszen HG, Boerma D; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1261-1268. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3. PubMed 26460661 ↗
  • Sinha R. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: the optimal choice? HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(5):332-5. doi: 10.1080/13651820802247078. PubMed 18982148 ↗
  • Ramirez-Giraldo C, Conde Monroy D, Daza Vergara JA, Isaza-Restrepo A, Van-Londono I, Trujillo-Guerrero L. Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis (CHISPA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2024 Mar 7;6(1):e000246. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000246. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38463464 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data obtained and input into the database is anonymous, without any individual or identifying characteristics will be stored in a dataset from the Centro de Recursos para el Aprendizaje y la Investigación, property of and administered by the Universidad del Rosario as a plan of data management. Moreover, the different codes used in the analysis will be stored in this dataset.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: It is in our plans once we obtain a register number from Clinical Trials in order to publish the protocol, statistical analysis plan and clinical study report in a scientific journal so it will be available to all people interested.

Access criteria: It is in our plans to be published in a scientific journal available to all people interested.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 2027→Apr 2027
Oct 22, 2026
Study completion
Jun 2027→Jul 2027
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Primary completion Jan 2027→Apr 2027
    Study completion Jun 2027→Jul 2027
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06113419
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
Collaborators
Universidad del Rosario
Responsible party
Camilo Ramirez Giraldo (General Surgeon, Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, MD
Contact
ramirezgiraldocamilo@gmail.com
+5773206770474
Camilo Ramirez-Giraldo, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion