CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07668206Updated Sep 18, 2026

Motivational Interviewing in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

An interventional study of Motivational Interviewing and Home Exercise Program in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if motivational interviewing (MI) works to improve symptoms in people with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). TOS is a condition that causes long-term pain, numbness, and weakness in the arm and shoulder area. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does MI lower pain and improve arm function in people with TOS?
  • Does psychological resilience predict treatment outcomes in people with TOS? Researchers will compare participants who receive MI sessions plus a home exercise program to those who receive a home exercise program alone. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups.

Participants will:

  • Follow a home exercise program for 6 weeks
  • Some participants will also attend up to 4 motivational interviewing sessions
  • Complete questionnaires about pain, function, sleep, anxiety, and depression at the start and end of the 6-week program
Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, non-blinded (assessor-blinded), parallel-group study examining the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) as an adjunct to a standardized home exercise program in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Eligible participants are randomly assigned using block randomization (block size of 4) to either the experimental arm (home exercise plus MI) or the active comparator arm (home exercise alone). The randomization sequence is generated using an online randomization tool by an individual not otherwise involved in the study, ensuring allocation concealment.

MI sessions are structured around four core techniques: open-ended questioning, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarizing. Sessions proceed through engagement, agenda setting, evocation of change talk, and goal setting phases, using strategies such as exploring ambivalence, decisional balance exercises, and scaling questions to assess motivation and confidence for behavior change. Homework assignments tailored to each participant's goals may include relaxation exercises, breath awareness training, and emotion regulation strategies in addition to the standard home exercise program.

All outcome assessments are conducted by a physiotherapist who is blinded to group allocation and not otherwise involved in delivering the interventions. Assessments take place at baseline (prior to initiation of the home exercise program) and at week 6.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Keywords

  • Motivational Interviewing
  • Chronic Pain
  • Home Exercise Program
  • Psychological Resilience
  • Central Sensitization
  • Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Pain duration of more than 6 months
  • No surgical intervention in the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Accompanying pathologies (cervical disc problems, fibromyalgia, rotator cuff problems, diabetes, neoplastic processes)
  • Unwillingness to provide informed consent
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motivational Interviewing + Home Exercise

    Participants randomly assigned to this arm receive a standardized 6-week home exercise program in addition to up to 4 face-to-face motivational interviewing (MI) sessions. The first two MI sessions are conducted one week apart, and the remaining two sessions two weeks apart, completing all 4 sessions within 6 weeks. MI sessions are delivered by a physiotherapist and a clinical psychologist trained in motivational interviewing techniques, and address ambivalence, goal setting, and behavior change related to pain management and adherence to the exercise program. The home exercise program is taught face-to-face by a physiotherapist and includes scalene and upper trapezius stretching, pectoralis minor stretching, median and ulnar nerve mobilization exercises, scapular stabilization exercises (middle/lower trapezius and rhomboids), and diaphragmatic breathing training, to be performed 3 times daily, 10 repetitions per sessio

    Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing · Behavioral: Home Exercise Program

  • Active comparator
    Home Exercise Only

    Participants randomly assigned to this arm receive the same standardized 6-week home exercise program as the experimental arm, without motivational interviewing sessions. The home exercise program is taught face-to-face by a physiotherapist and includes scalene and upper trapezius stretching, pectoralis minor stretching, median and ulnar nerve mobilization exercises, scapular stabilization exercises (middle/lower trapezius and rhomboids), and diaphragmatic breathing training, to be performed 3 times daily, 10 repetitions per session, for 6 weeks.

    Behavioral: Home Exercise Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotivational Interviewing

    A patient-centered counseling approach consisting of up to 4 face-to-face sessions delivered over 6 weeks. Sessions follow motivational interviewing (MI) principles, including collaborative engagement, open-ended questions, reflective listening, affirmations, and summarizing, to explore ambivalence and elicit change talk. Sessions address goal setting, decisional balance regarding behavior change, and strategies to support adherence to pain self-management and the home exercise program.

  • BehavioralHome Exercise Program

    A standardized 6-week home exercise program taught face-to-face by a physiotherapist, including scalene and upper trapezius stretching (15 seconds per repetition), pectoralis minor stretching (15 seconds per repetition), median and ulnar nerve self-mobilization exercises, scapular stabilization exercises targeting the middle and lower trapezius and rhomboid muscles using elastic resistance bands, and diaphragmatic breathing training. The program is performed 3 times daily, 10 repetitions per exercise, for 6 weeks. Participants maintain an exercise diary to track adherence.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale)

    Pain intensity assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), separately for pain at rest, during activity, and at night. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Upper Extremity Function (DASH Questionnaire)

    Upper extremity function and symptoms assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, a 30-item scale covering daily activities, symptoms, and social/work/sleep impact. Scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disability.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Central Sensitization (Central Sensitization Inventory)

    Central sensitization-related symptoms assessed using Part A of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), a 25-item questionnaire with each item scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Total scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater central sensitization. A cut-off score of 40 or above is widely used to indicate clinically significant central sensitization, with severity classified as subclinical (0-29), mild (30-39), moderate (40-49), severe (50-59), or extreme (60-100).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia)

    Fear of movement and re-injury assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), a 17-item questionnaire with each item scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 17 to 68. Higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DASS-21)

    Depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), a 21-item scale with 7 items per subscale (Depression, Anxiety, Stress), each item scored from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or most of the time). Subscale raw scores are summed and multiplied by 2 to allow comparison with normative data from the original 42-item DASS. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Severity is classified using standard cut-offs: Depression (Normal 0-9, Mild 10-13, Moderate 14-20, Severe 21-27, Extremely Severe 28+), Anxiety (Normal 0-7, Mild 8-9, Moderate 10-14, Severe 15-19, Extremely Severe 20+), and Stress (Normal 0-14, Mild 15-18, Moderate 19-25, Severe 26-33, Extremely Severe 34+).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Psychological Resilience (Brief Resilience Scale)

    Psychological resilience assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), a 6-item scale with each item scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); 3 items are reverse-scored. Total scores range from 1.00 to 5.00. Scores are classified as low (1.00-2.99), normal (3.00-4.30), or high (4.31-5.00) resilience.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Pain Self-Efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire)

    Pain self-efficacy assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), a 10-item scale with each item scored from 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident). Total scores range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater pain self-efficacy.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Pain Coping (Pain Coping Inventory)

    Pain coping strategies assessed using the Pain Coping Inventory (PCI), a 22-item scale covering 6 subscales of active coping (distraction, pain transformation, reducing demands) and passive coping (worrying, resting, retreating). Each item is scored from 1 (rarely or never) to 4 (very often). Higher subscale scores indicate greater use of that coping strategy. There is no universally established cut-off value; subscale scores are interpreted continuously.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Sleep Quality (Jenkins Sleep Scale)

    Sleep disturbance assessed using the Jenkins Sleep Scale, a 4-item questionnaire with each item scored from 0 (not at all) to 5 (22-28 nights). Total scores range from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  9. Anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory)

    State and trait anxiety assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), a 40-item scale (20 items per subscale) with each item scored from 1 to 4. Subscale scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. There is no universally established cut-off value; scores are interpreted continuously.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Şule Tüzen Tek, MSc, PT · Contact · sule.tuzen@gmail.com · +905076370001
    • Tüzün Fırat, Prof · Principal investigator
    • Nur Sena Yarımkaya, MSc, PT, Psychologist · Sub investigator
    • Gülay Uzun, MSc, PT · Sub investigator
    • Ayten Kayı Cangır, Prof · Sub investigator
    • Şule T Tüzen Tek, MSc, PT · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and privacy considerations related to the sensitive nature of the psychological and pain-related data collected, and because no data sharing infrastructure or participant consent for external data sharing was established for this study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07668206
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Tüzün Fırat (Professor, Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Şule Tüzen Tek, MSc, PT
Contact
sule.tuzen@gmail.com
+905076370001
Tüzün Fırat, Prof
Contact
tuzun@hacettepe.edu.tr
+905326710635
Tüzün Fırat, Prof
principal investigator · Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion