ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07664215Updated Jun 24, 2026

A Novel Bi-dimensional Archwire for Miniscrew-supported En-masse Retraction

An interventional study of Bi-dimensional archwire in Malocclusion Class II and CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 28 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 28 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to provide a preliminary clinical evaluation of a novel bi-dimensional archwire used during miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth. Adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion requiring extraction of the maxillary first premolars will be screened at the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University. Eligible participants will receive fixed orthodontic treatment followed by en-masse retraction using a custom-made laser-welded bi-dimensional stainless-steel archwire consisting of a 0.019 × 0.025-inch anterior segment and 0.016 × 0.022-inch posterior segments. Retraction will be supported by orthodontic miniscrews and nickel-titanium closed-coil springs. The main outcome will be the monthly rate of maxillary anterior retraction assessed on three-dimensional digital dental models. A secondary outcome will be the change in maxillary incisor torque assessed on lateral cephalometric radiographs. This pilot study is intended to generate preliminary clinical data regarding the feasibility and performance of this novel archwire design.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed as a prospective single-arm pilot clinical trial to provide an initial clinical evaluation of a novel bi-dimensional archwire specifically developed for miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth. In adult orthodontic patients requiring extraction-based treatment, effective space closure depends not only on anchorage control, but also on the ability of the active retraction system to maintain acceptable control of the maxillary incisors during sliding mechanics. Conventional continuous rectangular stainless-steel archwires provide rigidity, but they may still be associated with frictional resistance, wire deformation, and incomplete torque control during retraction.

The archwire investigated in this study was newly developed as a single continuous stainless-steel assembly composed of a 0.019 × 0.025-inch anterior segment and 0.016 × 0.022-inch posterior segments joined by laser welding. The design was intended to combine greater anterior stiffness, to support better torque control of the maxillary incisors, with reduced posterior friction and binding during sliding mechanics. The intervention was applied under direct skeletal anchorage using self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews inserted bilaterally between the maxillary second premolars and first molars. Retraction was performed using nickel-titanium closed-coil springs delivering approximately 250 g of force per side.

Eligible participants were adult patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and Class II Division 1 dental malocclusion who required extraction of the maxillary first premolars and en-masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth as part of their treatment plan. After leveling and alignment, the novel bi-dimensional archwire was inserted and the retraction phase was initiated. Participants were followed prospectively until completion of the en-masse retraction phase.

The primary outcome of the study was the monthly rate of maxillary anterior en-masse retraction assessed on three-dimensional digital dental models. The secondary outcome was the change in maxillary incisor torque measured on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs using the bracket-archwire angle. This pilot trial was undertaken to determine whether this newly developed archwire could function as a clinically feasible biomechanical option and to generate preliminary outcome estimates for future randomized controlled trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion Class II
  • CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION

Keywords

  • Class II division 1
  • protrusion
  • Bi-dimensional archwire
  • retraction
  • upper anterior teeth retraction
  • en masse retraction
03

In context

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class II; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 34 across 115 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class II.

Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class II studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 28 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-28 years with skeletal Class II malocclusion (ANB angle 5°-7°)
  • Class II Division 1 dental malocclusion according to Angle classification
  • An average or vertical facial growth pattern
  • A treatment plan requiring extraction of the maxillary first premolars
  • A need for maxillary anterior en-masse retraction
  • The presence of all permanent maxillary teeth except the third molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous orthodontic treatment,
  • Craniofacial anomalies, systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism
  • Active periodontal disease
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Missing maxillary permanent teeth, or were using
  • The use of medications known to influence bone metabolism
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bi-dimensional archwire

    Participants will be treated using a novel bi-dimensional stainless-steel archwire during miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth

    Procedure: Bi-dimensional archwire

Interventions

  • ProcedureBi-dimensional archwire

    The retraction procedure is going to be conducted using a bi-dimensional archwire which is a single continuous stainless-steel assembly composed of a 0.019 × 0.025-inch anterior segment and 0.016 × 0.022-inch posterior segments joined by laser welding.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the monthly rate of maxillary anterior en-masse retraction

    The amount of maxillary anterior retraction is assessed on three-dimensional digital dental models using the distance between the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisors and the medial point of the third palatal rugae as a stable intraoral reference. The monthly retraction rate is calculated in millimeters per month by dividing the amount of anterior retraction by the corresponding duration of the retraction interval.

    Time frame: Time 0: completion of leveling and alignment which happens within three months); Times 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 after one, two, three, four, and five months following the end of the leveling and alignment stage; Time Final: at the end of the retraction stage.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in maxillary incisor torque

    Maxillary incisor torque is assessed on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs using the bracket-archwire angle. A tangent is drawn along the base of the maxillary central incisor bracket, and another tangent is drawn parallel to and superimposed on the working archwire. The obtuse angle formed between the two tangents is measured, and the actual torque value is calculated by subtracting 90° from this angle. The change in torque is determined by comparing the measurements recorded at T0 and T1.

    Time frame: Time 0: completion of leveling and alignment stage which is expected to occur within three months, and Time Final: completion of en-masse retraction stage which occurs within 9 - 10 months following the end of the leveling and alignment stage.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
    Damascus, DM20AM19, Syria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gnaneswar SM, Sridhar P. Comparison of dual-dimensional and rectangular wires in terms of space closure and anchorage loss during retraction with miniimplants: A prospective clinical study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020 Winter;14(1):54-60. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.008. PubMed 32454959 ↗
  • Hamanaka R, Cantarella D, Lombardo L, Karanxha L, Del Fabbro M, Siciliani G, Yoshida N. Dual-section versus conventional archwire for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth with direct skeletal anchorage: a finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01443-0. PubMed 33632190 ↗
  • Li Y, Tang N, Xu Z, Feng X, Yang L, Zhao Z. Bidimensional techniques for stronger anterior torque control in extraction cases: a combined clinical and typodont study. Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):715-22. doi: 10.2319/082811-550.1. Epub 2011 Dec 8. PubMed 22149540 ↗
  • Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Patil S. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):18-29.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.025. PubMed 18617099 ↗
  • Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20. PubMed 23787192 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07664215
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2026
Completion
May 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Abdulmalek M. H. Almasri, DDS
principal investigator · Damascus University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion