ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07653555Updated Sep 18, 2026

Cascade Testing In Identifying At-risk Family Members Of Individuals With Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) In PCP

An interventional study of Cascade testing and Standard of Care in Familial Hypercholesterolemia, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
480
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 76 studies in Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II with a site in United States — 17 open to participants now, 18 under way, 6 of them phase 3. Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II · United States.

Planned enrollment
13th of 68
480 · median 163
Started
2026
with 3 others
No phase
13 of 76
8 open now
Primary completion
2028-06
later than 13 of 17 live
Registered
75th of 76
by date

Among the 76 studies in Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II with a site in United States, this one is the 13th largest by planned enrollment of the 68 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2026, is one of 13 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 13 of the 17 other live ones, and was the 75th registered.

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II

249 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II; 56 are open to participants now.

Browse Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II studies →

Open to participants now

17 of the 76 studies in Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

11 more — sign in →

All 17 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 36 Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II studies recruiting now, 17 (47%) set no upper age limit and 15 (42%) stop at 75 or younger; 17 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 1 Year and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 76 studies in Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two models of cascade testing in identifying at-risk family members of individuals diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

Read the detailed description
  1. Index Patient Genetic Testing (only index patients from the REP database):

    • Index patients identified through the REP database will undergo confirmatory FH testing HCHLG panel
    • A sputum collection kit is mailed to participants along with a pre-addressed return mailer.
    • Results are recorded in the electronic medical record and communicated to index (REP) participants with next-step instructions.
    • Only index patients with confirmed pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants proceed in the study.
  2. Relative Genetic Testing:

    • Relatives in the intervention arm who contact the study team and consent will be mailed a Focused Molecular Targeted Test (FMTT) sputum kit.
    • Testing targets the specific FH variant identified in the corresponding index patient.
    • Testing costs are covered **only** for relatives in the intervention arm.
    • Control arm relatives may choose to pursue clinical genetic testing independently through their primary care provider referring them to genetic counselling (usual care).
  3. Baseline Data Collection (Index Patients):

    • Collection of demographics and FH-related history via REDCap.
    • LDL-C values abstracted from EMR; ROI used if external records are required.
  4. Randomization:

    • Index patients randomized 2:1 to intervention or control arm.
    • Randomization occurs only after completion of baseline survey.
  5. Intervention Arm Procedures:

    Indirect contact:

    In the CASCADE-FH trial, index patients receive IRB-approved recruitment letters, with contact information for the primary care study team, to distribute to up to three first- or second-degree relatives. Relatives who contact the team undergo screening and electronic consent. In this study, index patients choosing the indirect pathway are provided with structured Mayo approved educational materials to support the index patient in accurate and consistent communication with relatives.

    Direct Contact:

    In the CASCADE-FH trial, modified direct contact is operationalized through an IRB approved recruitment letter sent by the index patient to their relatives with contact information for the primary care study team. No direct outreach from the study team occurs unless a relative independently initiates contact to the study team.

    Relatives who contact the team undergo screening and electronic consent. After consent the primary care study team will be able to provide direct support to the at-risk relatives, provide Mayo-approved patient educational materials, and inform them of their potential risk for FH and the opportunity for genetic testing. This approach allows the primary care study team to provide a more direct method of communication and interaction with the at-risk relatives. The study team will also facilitate genetic testing, should the relative wish to proceed with genetic testing for FH.

    • Intervention-arm relatives receive FMTT sputum kits paid for by the study.
  6. Control Arm Procedures:

    • Index patients receive usual care. No structured outreach is provided.
    • Relatives may seek genetic testing for FH through their primary care provider referring them to genetic counselling.
    • The study does not cover genetic counseling or testing costs in the control arm.
  7. Relative Procedures (All Arms):

    • Relatives who contact the research team receive full study information and undergo screening and consent.
    • Baseline surveys collected via REDCap.
    • Minors require parental consent and age-appropriate assent.
  8. Follow-Up Surveys:

    • Index patients and relatives receive surveys at 1, 3, and 12 months via REDCap.
    • Up to two reminder emails are sent approximately 7 days apart.
    • Participants who do not respond after reminders are classified as lost to follow-up.
  9. Genetic Testing Workflow:

    • Returned sputum kits will be processed.
    • Results entered into EMR for all participants.
    • index (REP) participants and relatives in the intervention arm are notified via secure message or email on next steps.

      • Index (REP) participants who test positive are instructed to follow up with their primary care provider.
      • Follow-up for Positive Findings for Relatives in the intervention arm:

Participants who receive a pathogenic or likely pathogenic result for FH will be notified via secure patient portal or email. Notifications will instruct the participant to contact their primary care provider for referral to genetic counseling and/or preventive cardiology.

Parents or guardians of minors aged 1-18 years who test positive will be instructed to contact the child's primary care provider to obtain referral to a pediatric endocrinologist.

03

Conditions studied

  • Familial Hypercholesterolemia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Index Patients:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Confirmed FH diagnosis using Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria *or* genetic confirmation.
  • Identified through REP or Tapestry databases.
  • Able and willing to provide .
  • At least one eligible first- or second-degree relative.
  • Access to and active use of email (computer literacy requirement).

Relatives:

  • First- or second-degree relative of an enrolled index patient.
  • Age ≥ 1 year (minors require parental consent + assent).
  • Willing to participate and able to complete electronic consent (guardian-assisted if minor).
  • Access to and active use of email (guardian).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Index Patients:

  • No confirmed FH diagnosis.
  • Insufficient clinical follow-up (\<5 years).
  • No identifiable or contactable relatives.
  • Prior participation in structured cascade testing.
  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing .

Relatives:

  • Prior participation in structured cascade testing.
  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing informed consent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Patients will receive standard of care support

    Other: Standard of Care

  • Experimental
    Structured Outreach

    Patients and relatives will receive outreach in the form of direct or indirect contact

    Other: Cascade testing

Interventions

  • OtherCascade testing

    Patient relatives will be contacted either directly or indirectly per patient preference: The indirect contact method provides patients with structured Mayo approved educational materials to support the index patient in accurate and consistent communication with relatives. Relatives have the option to contact the study team for cascade genetic testing. The direct contact method provides patients with a letter inviting relatives to contact the study team. After contact, relatives are offered educational materials and the opportunity for cascade genetic testing.

  • OtherStandard of Care

    No structured outreach is provided to patient or family members. Relatives may have their primary care provider refer them to genetic counseling services for cascade testing coordination.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Genetic testing among first- and second-degree relatives within 12 months of index patient enrollment

    Defined as total number of relations to complete CLIA-certified FH test (LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, LDLRAP1) with result returned to the primary care research team.

    Time frame: 2 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of newly diagnosed FH cases among relatives

    Total number of patient relatives newly diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Time from index patient enrollment (Tapestry identified participants) and diagnosis (REP identified and FH genetic test confirmation) to relative testing

    Number of days between patient enrollment and testing of relatives

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Time from relative diagnosis to treatment initiation

    Number of days between diagnosis and start of treatment

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Communication modality preference

    letter sent by the index patient to their relatives with contact information for the primary care study team. the indirect pathway are provided with structured Mayo approved educational materials to support the index patient in accurate and consistent communication with relatives.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Referral completion (genetics, cardiology, preventive cardiology) within 6 months of positive result

    Number of patients to be referred to specialty within 6 months of positive result

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Cascade depth (degree of relatives reached)

    Degree of relatives reached (1st, 2nd, 3rd)

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jun 2028, 20 months later.

Of 35 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 37 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2026
First posted
Jun 17, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 20, 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 20, 2029
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07653555
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Isa J. Houwink (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 17, 2026
Start date
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Family Medicine Research Study Coordinators
Contact
RSTFMSC@mayo.edu
507-422-6823
Elisa J. Houwink, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion